Woodsey said:
Emphraim said:
Woodsey said:
Emphraim said:
Woodsey said:
Emphraim said:
EA always seems to cut corners on their games.
Huh? I know they did in the past but wasn't Dead Space counted as one of the biggest and best surprises of 2008?
They've also moved on and doing decent projects and publishing a lot of good stuff.
Deadspace was a project worked mostly outside of EA's administrative interference. Once EA saw they had a possible milking franchise they stepped in and this occurs. Besides, every game they publish has DRM on it. That's not "good stuff".
So you label a game bad because it's got a bit of software that takes about a minute to deal with?
Makes sense.
What do you mean a minute to deal with? What program do you have that lets you remove any DRM like securom from a game?
I mean deal with during an install. Seriously, it doesn't have the slightest affect on me.
Thats not DRMs problem. There's a huge list of problems that I won't go into, because i can tell that Emphraim is just dieing to tell you what they are.
Anyway, yes, this game does look hidious. I really don't understand why so many people get away with releasing crap that looks like it's from a early PS2 game.
The Wii is capable so fucking much and no one seems to understand this. Look at Metroid Prime 3 or Mario Galaxy. These are not even games that use "artistic freedom" to make up for the Wii's so called short comings. These are games that you could get away with releasing on the 360. Nintendo can do it, so why not third party developers?!
The Wii is as powerful as the original xbox. You know what was ported to the Xbox? Mother fucking Half-Life 2! That's this generation graphics with a couple of iffy looking patches of dirt. The Wii has the protential to create some great games that look beautiful, but theres maybe 3 games on the Wii that even look remotely good looking.