Fox12 said:
But it wasn't a critical flop nor a commercial flop. To claim otherwise is wrong.
BUT I NEVER SAID IT WAS A COMMERCIAL FLOP BLAHrbfhlarglsnaphfvhsdfhfiuhsdflihsdifv.
*cools down and sighs*
Okay. here's what I said.
"I honestly don't understand Squares deep seated hatred of money. Why make a sequel to the most critically hated game in the entire series? You could argue this decision is financially justified because of the popularity of the original FFX, but if that's the case then why don't they remake more popular titles in the series? No one here wants this, no one asked for this."
I never said FFX-2 was a financial failure. What I did say is that it is not as successful as other titles. Why make a sequel to one of your less financially successful titles when you have so many more successful titles? Those games would have a stronger critical and financial appeal to them. I don't understand what part of this is factually inaccurate. I then said FFX-2 was "most critically hated game in the entire series." I admit I used hyperbole here, but FFX-2 is not nearly as critically successful as other FF games, many of which rank in the 90's on metacritic. I later posted:
"I was't referring to FFX, I was referring to FFX-2, which, unfortunately, was not as successful. Its sold 30% as many units as FFX internationally, and barely hit the 1 million mark in the states."
Based on initial success this is true. It was not as successful as FFX. Based on initial sales the information is also accurate. FFX-2's initial 3 million sales were 30% of FFX's 10 million. Though FFX-2 was not a critical financial failure, it was not as successful as the original, which is all I've been trying to say.
I understand you initially thought I was talking about FFX. It was a misunderstanding, and if that had been the case then you would have been correct. I was referring to FFX-2, however, so I don't see how I'm factually inaccurate.