I'm not even that much of a DMC fan, it's just that I'm confused by Capcom's recent thought process.Daystar Clarion said:I can understand that, but I'll give an example. Square-enix and Bioware can both be considered great developers yes? Now imagine if it was announced that Bioware was going to develop a new Final Fantasy game. Some people would hate the decision just because Bioware isn't a Japanese dev. Those are the kind of fanboys I hate.Casual Shinji said:Ninja Theory is a bad developer regardless of nationality.Daystar Clarion said:Don't you understand. The devs are not Japanese, which means that they will fail on every single level of justifiable existence! Otaku-tards piss me off.Woodsey said:It looks like a younger version of the same person to me, which is what they were trying to get I believe.
And even if they're not that bad, they're still not good enough to handle a game like DMC. Having a well-established franchise change developer is almost always a bad idea, but if you have to, atleast give it to someone who knows what they're doing.
Like with shipping Dead Rising 2 to another developer. I'm not saying the first game was perfect, but if Capcom took their time and ironed out the faults, the sequel could've been great. But instead they give it to a developer no one's ever heard of who succeeds in copying the mistakes of the first game aswell as making the game worse in both controls and graphics. Maybe I'm jumping the gun with this one, but I played DR2: Case Zero and it was God awful.
I just look at this whole DMC business as yet another very odd decision by Capcom.