That's really awesome, great to know, thanks. Now I just need to hope and pray my new (soon to be obtained) laptop should run it.Abedeus said:I think I've seen it somewhere.rossatdi said:This sounds most awesome. Is this be sourced or just something you'd be hoping? Although I certainly understand your logic.Abedeus said:Diablo 3 won't have a sub fee.
Battle.net 2 will have some OPTIONS for $, like extra security key generator (like the ones for WoW), more character slots...
Besides, that would be shooting themselves in the feet. Many people, including me, are still playing Diablo 2 because it's an awesome game you can play online for free.
And why would they get another subscription-based game, if they have another MMO in development?
Yeah, it was an interview from October 14th during the Blizzcon 2008. I'm afraid, however, I do not have an English version of it. But Rob Pardo said they don't plan on turning Diablo into a sub-based game, explaining that the game is not a MMO and that would make little sense to charge additionally for it. He did however said that there might be some elements on B.Net that won't, however, give any advantage in-game, like special items or instant levelups.
It's more like - you want to change character name or server? Pay. You don't have to do it, but if you want to, you can. Won't give you any advantage over non-paying people.
A £400 laptop should run Diablo 3 right?