I found it clever in a cheesy, pelvis crushing, mind is willing but the flesh is spongy and bruised kinda manner.grimner said:Snu Snu? Really?
ahaha. I'm a sucker for terrible punsGus Mastrapa said:There's something about this game that just clicks.
In the full game you will have accsess to 6 active skills at a time and 3 passive ones.Metalhandkerchief said:Yeah, no. Every little bit of info on this game I hear, the further I am removed from wanting to play it. 3 skils? Hahahahaha.
Exactly what I did. Going for Torchlight 2 instead-- the always on drm and lack of mod support is what turned me away. I don't object to the market, but I wonder how useful the in-game gold market will turn out to be.paketep said:The only clicks I'm hearing are those of people canceling preorders.
Why?Kahunaburger said:Sweet. This isn't my thing, but it makes me very happy about the near future for RPGs.
Other than your mistake calling it 'normal' to be tolerant (which was clearly just misphrasing), I very much like you good sir.Captain Placeholder said:Oh it is 'Cool' to hate on things Popular. Blizzard is Very Popular. So is Activision. Therefore, popular is bad and any game that must come from either developer will be bad. All because it is the popular thing to do.WabbitTwacks said:I don't understand the whining. The auction house is optional and this game will have more active skills than D2. so what's the big deal?
As far as I can tell they are just a bunch of fuckin' morons. However that is just me, they have yet to play it and are just bitching just to *****. A normal mind would say 'Wait until the game has been released before using any Judgement or hatred upon the game' however that is called the brain. Most don't seem to have them nowadays.
Because I like other RPGs. Diablo III being a good game and doing well means two things to me:Kurokami said:Why?Kahunaburger said:Sweet. This isn't my thing, but it makes me very happy about the near future for RPGs.
Sorta like saying that playing soccer on concrete made out of spikes isn't your thing cause you don't like soccer but are happy for its direction.
I mean, his general message was "Diablo was great, therefore I don't care about the system flaws" (or whatever you want to call DRM and such), you're saying that Diablo isn't your thing. Which is understandable, but I don't get your perspective if you say it makes you happy for the near future of RPGs, unless you're stocked for the DRM and micro transactions maybe?
(I'm sincerely confused. Not just being a dick)
But that's Kurokami's point.Kahunaburger said:Because I like other RPGs. Diablo III being a good game and doing well means two things to me:
A) Inspiration for other RPG devs in terms of mechanics and gameplay*,
B) The suits see RPGs making money and are more likely to okay RPGs in the future, especially if other RPGs coming out this year are also successful.
So even if it isn't my thing and I have absolutely no intention of playing it, I can still root for it because a year from now if successful it will be part of a "RPGs sell" narrative being aimed at developers.
*Edit: and I don't see the concept of micro-transactions being that workable for someone who isn't Blizzard and doesn't already have the infrastructure to handle it.