That's not really proof. C&C has been more or less a PC only thing and given the fact that games from DICE have developed on mutiplatorms with a console based audiance despite Crysis 1 being a PC exclusive for a while.gigastar said:Want to be proven wrong? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generals_2]ASnogarD said:A bit silly to say the least, as the consoles aint 64bit ( at least the 360 isnt ), and DICE ( or more to the point , EA ) wont develop a PC only title.
Says the person who doesn't know how to make a ram disk ;PMatthew94 said:More RAM won't improve loading times, you seem to be under the placebo effect if I may say so.Doom-Slayer said:Eeeeew...I had 8gb of DDR3, upgraded it to 16GB for giggles haha. Only cost me like $70. Its definably worth the step up though, load times go soooo much faster. Skyrim loads in like..10 seconds for me.FargoDog said:I'm still running Windows Vista 32-bit with 4GB of DDR2 RAM. I'm definitely going to upgrade to 7 at some point soon but a RAM upgrade would be such a hassle >.<
Why not get an SSD if you want fast loading times? Prices are crashing.
From this post [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/114681-BioWare-Tackles-Strategy-with-Command-Conquer-Generals-2]...mad825 said:That's not really proof. C&C has been more or less a PC only thing and given the fact that games from DICE have developed on mutiplatorms with a console based audiance despite Crysis 1 being a PC exclusive for a while.gigastar said:Want to be proven wrong? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generals_2]ASnogarD said:A bit silly to say the least, as the consoles aint 64bit ( at least the 360 isnt ), and DICE ( or more to the point , EA ) wont develop a PC only title.
Still, I wouldn't hold my breath too long for C&C:gen 2 being a PC exclusive.
So we arent about to see a repeat of the PS3 version of Red Alert 3.At least they've said that Generals 2 will be PC exclusive. I'm glad most sane game developers have realized that RTS will just never work on consoles - unless Kinect voice commands get a lot better.
Also, almost all current CPU's for sale today (even some of the higher end atom processors) are 64bit CPUs, that does not mean that the operating system or the games are (or need to be) 64 bit, it just means the CPU could support them if they were.gigastar said:Want to be proven wrong? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generals_2]ASnogarD said:A bit silly to say the least, as the consoles aint 64bit ( at least the 360 isnt ), and DICE ( or more to the point , EA ) wont develop a PC only title.
It'd be more cost-effective in the long run to make the leap now. RAM is piss cheap right now too, I got 8GB of DDR3 for £40 recently.FargoDog said:Oh it'd be no problem to buy some (even if it does cost like three times more than DDR3) and installing it. I'm just not sure it's worth bumping up my DDR2 or going all out and putting in a new motherboard with DDR3.MercurySteam said:Gah, Vista is a terrible OS, but finding DDR2 memory and installing it is fairly straightforward.FargoDog said:I'm still running Windows Vista 32-bit with 4GB of DDR2 RAM. I'm definitely going to upgrade to 7 at some point soon but a RAM upgrade would be such a hassle >.<
More RAM can certainly speed up load times if you have enough to set up a RAM disk. But that's probably not what he's talking about.Matthew94 said:More RAM won't improve loading times, you seem to be under the placebo effect if I may say so.Doom-Slayer said:Eeeeew...I had 8gb of DDR3, upgraded it to 16GB for giggles haha. Only cost me like $70. Its definably worth the step up though, load times go soooo much faster. Skyrim loads in like..10 seconds for me.FargoDog said:I'm still running Windows Vista 32-bit with 4GB of DDR2 RAM. I'm definitely going to upgrade to 7 at some point soon but a RAM upgrade would be such a hassle >.<
Why not get an SSD if you want fast loading times? Prices are crashing.
I only have 6 GB of RAM and Skyrim loads that fast for me. I don't think you needed that extra 8 GB of RAM. I don't think Skyrim even uses more than 4 GB and that's after the patch that let it use more than 2 GB.Doom-Slayer said:Eeeeew...I had 8gb of DDR3, upgraded it to 16GB for giggles haha. Only cost me like $70. Its definably worth the step up though, load times go soooo much faster. Skyrim loads in like..10 seconds for me.FargoDog said:I'm still running Windows Vista 32-bit with 4GB of DDR2 RAM. I'm definitely going to upgrade to 7 at some point soon but a RAM upgrade would be such a hassle >.<