Discuss and Rate the Last Film You Watched

Is this the first poll?


  • Total voters
    45

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
2,840
2,801
118
Country
United States
 

Bartholen

At age 6 I was born without a face
Legacy
Jul 1, 2020
813
894
98
Country
Finland
Gran Torino, 7/10

This is Clint Eastwood's "farewell film" to his Dirty Harry persona. He plays Walt Kowalski, a grumpy Korean war vet who inadvertently makes friends with his vietnamese neighbors and ends up tangled in their business. It's pretty good. The acting's all good and it's got a relaxed pace that takes its time and immerses you in its everyday trappings. There's minimal music, and it only bubbles up in the most critical moments, and even then it's very subdued. The ending is also incredible.

My problems with the film are with its structure. It's kind of at a halfway point between a completely plotless slice of life and straightforward drama film, and the end result is kind of awkward. It doesn't really have a lot of narrative momentum, because it barely has a narrative to begin with. As such, when things start to escalate towards the end it can feel like the movie goes from 10 to 60 in just a few moments. It's also got a fair bit of a White Savior narrative to it, even when it's very matter of fact and down to earth. Not sharing either of the culture the film depicts kind of leaves me scratching my head at exactly how realistic or respectful it's being. It's also got a bit of a boomer wish fulfilment fantasy whiff about if, with this grizzled old guy teaching those damn kids how things are supposed to be done.

The Wild Robot, 5/10

Decided to watch this since it was a big Oscar darling for Animated Feature. It's about a robot stranded on a wilderness island who ends up raising a gosling, and becoming a sort of protector figure for the island. I didn't like it that much. Beautiful animation aside I found it very schmaltzy and saccharine. The narrative felt very by the numbers and Hollywood, and the score being super insistent and emotionally forced only made me cringe more. It only got worse as it went on, and by the end I was actually groaning aloud at some of the moments. The merits of this movie lie entirely in its visuals, which are very reminiscient of Puss in Boots: The Last Wish in the use of color and stylization. The cinematography is also breathtaking with many downright painting-like shots. It's just a shame that the story was so formulaic.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
19,166
3,731
118
The Electric State

Visionary directors Joe and Anthony Russo (You, Me & Dupree) team up again to make a YA seat-filler for Netflix. The reason why I can never get into YA is that no dystopia that is one rebellious teenager away from being overthrown can be THAT bad. In a subversive move, the directors have cast a grown woman in the role of a spunky not-like-the-other-girls, with Chris Pratt showing up for good measure. This movie has everything: people talking to CGI robots, people walking with CGI robots, people fighting CGI robots. It's like I was there, with the robots!
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
2,840
2,801
118
Country
United States
 
  • Like
Reactions: gorfias

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
2,840
2,801
118
Country
United States
 

Xprimentyl

Made you look...
Legacy
Aug 13, 2011
6,797
5,114
118
Plano, TX
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Presence (2024)

Steven Soderbergh's version of a Blumhouse movie, shot entirely from the ghost's POV. All tension, no jump scares. The whole thing really builds up to this one moment at the end. Now I enjoyed it but can just imagine recommending this to someone and then maybe a week later getting a sternly voiced message from them.
Yeah, we watched this one a couple of weeks ago, and it underwhelmed. The "one moment" wasn't enough of a payoff. I can appreciate the experiment, but given the entire paranormal premise is addressed from the position of the paranormal, it comes across as perplexingly and uncomfortably... voyeuristic? I felt like I was just watching the intimate moments of a family dealing with drama; there didn't really feel like a concentrated narrative effort.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
19,166
3,731
118
Mickey 17

In an alternate timeline in which Donald Trump lost both elections, he embarks on a 4 year expedition into space so he can lord over some ice planet populated by giant tardigrades, who straddle the line dividing creepy and cute.

Trump is played by Mark Ruffalo (13 Going on 30), who is a fine actor, but I posit an impression of Donald Trump needs more than "I hate Donald Trump" in order to be a successful one. I was sick of it 5 minutes in, and he's around for the whole movie.

On that same note, 2 hours and 17 minutes is way too long to be in the company of the stupidest character in the movie. Pattinson plays Mickey 17 with the accent, face and compunction of a certain kind of character actors should never "go full", to paraphrase Tropic Thunder. In a better version of this movie Mickey either shuts the fuck up or lets, I don't know, Jeremy Irons play his inner voice.

So Mickey 17 is about approximately too many things. In order: life being rendered immaterial by late stage capitalism, questions of soul and identity, the morality of cloning and scientific experimentation (ends/means tripe), Donald Trump being an idiot and veganism. The way the movie handles these, the message is either obvious from the start or it isn't really developed at all. The last hour or so of the movie is a protracted standstill between people and tardigrades that felt as manufactured as it was overdrawn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,431
2,004
118
Country
USA
Companion Amazon Prime rental

My kid rented it so I watched while still available on her dime :) Knew there was a reason to raise her!

Just wicked! What I knew of it was that it would be about a

jail broke sex robot goes berserk... nope. Much more to it than that!

Gets an A from me. Highly recommended.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Johnny Novgorod

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
2,840
2,801
118
Country
United States
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johnny Novgorod

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
2,840
2,801
118
Country
United States
Why, yes, I do in fact hate myself for committing to this.

 

Ezekiel

Elite Member
May 29, 2007
1,542
653
118
Country
United States
Project A and Project A II (1983 and '87) Hong Hong theatrical cuts in Cantonese.

My 31st and 32nd Jackie Chan movies. Once again the fights and stunts (Actors will never suffer like Chan for the camera again.) are great and the stories are crappy, all over the place, kinda boring. A frustrating actor. PA1 has Sammo Hung, PA2 loses him, but at least has the lovely Maggie Cheung.



PA1 is the one with the bicycle chase.


Ripping these UHDs, I noted...

Project A

Track 1 in the M2TS structure is actually Mandarin, not Cantonese. They're swapped.

Project A II

The original mono (track 1) is too muffled. Sounds terrible. Remixed mono (track 2) and Japanese Cantonese mix (track 3) are good.

I heard another set of very quiet voices underneath the Atmos. Lol. They just dubbed on top of some mix. Would never watch such movies with Atmos anyway.

The Legend of Drunken Master is the one that bothered me the most, because of how late in his career, 1994. Sixteen years since Drunken Master and he never thought to hire good screenwriters. It's contemptible. In this story that's all over the place he plays a character that is written twenty years younger, with a father who is visibly barely older than him. If I wrote a sequel to Drunken Master all those years later, Chan's character would be independent. His 31-year-old mother is at least his stepmother. She was amusing.

I like the actors. I can still get into the style, can bear through the boring parts.






Romancing the Stone and The Jewel of the Nile (1984 and '85)

3/5 both.

First movie had too many coincidences, second movie was so contrived, with the Kathleen Turner novelist character asked to write a biography about the false prophet of a fake Middle-Eastern/North African religion. Neither really had good action scenes. Lots of white guys painted as brown people in the second one. But Michael Douglas and Kathleen Turner were a fun pair. They liked each other, which is probably why later they were in that movie directed by their costar Danny DeVito, War of the Roses. I like these movies.

Remember finding the F-16 fighter jet driving scene so cool as a kid... "I'm out of quarters."

As the couple hung over the pit while the rats and acid ate their ropes, I thought about Nathan Drake and Elena Fisher and how dumb video game stories are. Uncharted, with its couple that stays together as opposed to Indiana Jones, can't even be like these movies, can't have such moments between lovers, because the constant shooting and climbing around like monkeys can't be interrupted for too long. Train scene also made me think of Uncharted 2 and how such scenes are typically so long in games that they lose their impact. Would never try to copy movies if I made games. Not in this way.

Not sad the second movie's critical reception killed any prospects for a third one, because it ends with them getting married, and a third movie was just gonna cycle through the same beats again, find some lame excuse to bring Danny DeVito back, and the third Indiana Jones was boring and pathetic anyway.
 
Last edited:

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
2,840
2,801
118
Country
United States
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
2,840
2,801
118
Country
United States
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
19,166
3,731
118
Maxxxine

It's a perfectly fun but mildly disappointing follow up to X and Pearl, starring everyone's favorite unhinged starlet in a relatively passive role this go around. Maxxxine wants to leave porn behind and sweep up Hollywood (she's all about becoming famous), and in the middle of landing a role in Horror Flick 2: Electric Boogaloo becomes embroiled in a series of murders attributed to the Night Stalker (who I now learn was a real serial killer in 84-85).

The reason I found it disappointing is that Mia Goth, being invariably the best thing about these movies, becomes kinda lost in the melee of a cluttered plot that chugs ahead regardless. Things kinda just happen and unravel around her, and the movie doesn't build up much tension for its big extravagant climax. I think the movie's also encumbered by its own messaging, whereas X and Pearl dipped into it more naturally through her characters.
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
2,840
2,801
118
Country
United States
Maxxxine

It's a perfectly fun but mildly disappointing follow up to X and Pearl, starring everyone's favorite unhinged starlet in a relatively passive role this go around. Maxxxine wants to leave porn behind and sweep up Hollywood (she's all about becoming famous), and in the middle of landing a role in Horror Flick 2: Electric Boogaloo becomes embroiled in a series of murders attributed to the Night Stalker (who I now learn was a real serial killer in 84-85).

The reason I found it disappointing is that Mia Goth, being invariably the best thing about these movies, becomes kinda lost in the melee of a cluttered plot that chugs ahead regardless. Things kinda just happen and unravel around her, and the movie doesn't build up much tension for its big extravagant climax. I think the movie's also encumbered by its own messaging, whereas X and Pearl dipped into it more naturally through her characters.
"Fun" fact. The real life Night Stalker, Rodney Alcala, was actually a contestant on a dating show called The Dating Game. He actually was picked by the contestant, but she later got second thoughts and didn't go on the prize date. And yes, this was in the middle of his killing spree, and yes, he comes off as incredibly creepy during the clips that I've seen of him on the show.

As for the movie proper, yeah, it was definitely a letdown compared to X, and especially after Pearl, for the main reason you said. Maxine just kind of gets lost in the mix, and while Ti West is usually quite good at capturing the vibes of genre throwbacks, he sort of missed with the giallo that he was apparently going for, being surprisingly restrained in a genre that demands excess of style. It was like he was trying to combine modern noir like Blue Velvet or Chinatown with giallo elements, and he just never found the right balance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
19,166
3,731
118
"Fun" fact. The real life Night Stalker, Rodney Alcala, was actually a contestant on a dating show called The Dating Game. He actually was picked by the contestant, but she later got second thoughts and didn't go on the prize date. And yes, this was in the middle of his killing spree, and yes, he comes off as incredibly creepy during the clips that I've seen of him on the show.
That's a different serial killer (I saw the movie with Anna Kendrick, forget the name). This was the Night Stalker:


As for the movie proper, yeah, it was definitely a letdown compared to X, and especially after Pearl, for the main reason you said. Maxine just kind of gets lost in the mix, and while Ti West is usually quite good at capturing the vibes of genre throwbacks, he sort of missed with the giallo that he was apparently going for, being surprisingly restrained in a genre that demands excess of style. It was like he was trying to combine modern noir like Blue Velvet or Chinatown with giallo elements, and he just never found the right balance.
Yeah, I thought as far as the gore and the violence it was all surprisingly tame (except that one bit with "Buster Keaton"). Very few scenes are built up to be tense or scary, and we only see most killings after the fact. They name-drop the Black Dahlia at one point and looking back, yeah, this was closer to half-baked James Ellroy than a horror movie, much less one with the giallo.
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
2,840
2,801
118
Country
United States
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
2,840
2,801
118
Country
United States
 

PsychedelicDiamond

Wild at Heart and weird on top
Legacy
Jan 30, 2011
2,139
1,003
118
Longlegs (2024)

The Satanic Panic, as a historical phenomenon, has always fascinated me. For one because it's rather shocking to think that a developed nation well into the latter half of the 20th century could be tricked into buying into a modernized variant on the blood libel myth on a mass scale. But also because I'm well aware that it hasn't actually gone away, lying dormant for a while before causing a violent relapse in the form of Pizzagate and Q-Anon.

It's one of the most notable examples of mass delusion in modern western history and serves as a grim reminder how susceptible even a modern, enlightened nation is to what seems like an absolutely outlandish premise.

It was held in the 80's and well into the 90's that there was a secretive and powerful satanist cult responsible for the mass abduction, sexual abuse and ritualistic sacrifice of American children. There is some historical context to this that probably warrants explaining. Not only was America still reckoning with various serial murders that were commited by cults or cult adjacent communes like the Manson Family, not only was it the height of popularity for media with themes of occult horror like Rosemary's Baby, The Excorcist or The Omen (and was too many, mostly rightfully forgotten, productions attempting to cash in on the popularity of those) but it was also the first time society, as a whole, started to face just how normalized child abuse was and, one imagines, all too eager to find a scapegoat for it.

The interesting thing about the popular depiction of satanists is that it's mostly a media invention. The real "Church of Satan" was (still is, I suppose) a secular, ideologically libertarian group, most actual occult orders don't venerate Satan and the image of the robed, long haired, pentagram wearing devil worshipper is a weird amalgamation of actual occult orders and the emerging goth and heavy hetal subcultures.

And I could go on about all of this for about half a dozen paragraphs longer and turn it into one of my thinly veiled blog posts about a subject only tangentially related to a movie but I have the courtesy not to.

Where I'm going with this little lead in is, in 2024 Osgood Perkins released a movie that dares to ask "what if there really had been satanists killing children between the 70's and 90's?" a premise neither executed with the self awareness nor cleverness to justify the way it plays with a very real and in some ways ongoing witch hunt of recent American history.

Maika Monroe plays FBI Agent Lee Harker who's investigating a child serial killer called Longlegs who, as fictional serial killers tend to, has been leaving notes for her to decypher. No, seriously, at this point it would be refreshing to see a movie about a serial killer investigation where the killer doesn't go out of their way to leave behind clues. Eventually she uncovers an occult conspiracy that is neither very exciting, nor makes a whole lot of sense.

There's a lot of really good film making in Longlegs, the performances, the dialogue, the set design is all just the right kind of off to create a nightmarish atmosphere but the actual material struck me as very weak. Longlegs resolution to its mysteries isn't the kind that left me satisfied or the good kind that of confused, it left me with a overwhelming feeling of "Really, that's it?" which might just be the worst way for this kind of movie to end.

It's the kind of movie that, to quote comedian Andy Richter, feels like someone taking you on a 14 mile hike to show you a dog turd. Listen, maybe there's something I'm missing here because there's a lot of gratuitous weird and ambiguous stuff in this movie that does make me wonder whether there's another layer to this story that I'm simply not grasping. Like the protagonists implied psychic abilities. But taken on face value, I dunno, this is a spoiler, the whole conceit of the killer making mind controlling dolls that his accomplice, the protagonists mum, gives away as birthday presents just struck me as stupid and contrived, even by the standards of supernatural horror.

It's not that there's nothing good to the movie, it's moody, it's well shot, the killer is played by Nicholas Cage and even though he's pretty much just doing his usual maniacal Nicholas Cage shtick, well, I think that's always good fun. But the pay off is just nonsense. By the end I felt like I just got done watching a really bad episode of Hannibal. It's one of those movies that feel like a joke I'm not in on. Wherever Perkins was going with all this, I'm afraid I'm not following. Frankly, I thought it was kinda dumb.