Discuss and Rate the Last Thing You Watched (non-movies)

Dalisclock

Making lemons combustible again
Legacy
Escapist +
Feb 9, 2008
11,241
7,020
118
A Barrel In the Marketplace
Country
Eagleland
Gender
Male
Good Omens.

I didn't read the book, just had a general idea from what people have told me so I went into this fairly blind. That being said, I rather enjoyed it. It was an interesting spin on the biblical apocalypse and a pretty good satire on christianity/christian mythology without going overboard into heavy handed preachiness(on either side).Particularly of the depiction that both heaven and hell are more interested in winning rather then any kind of principle and seem to consider the death of humanity as a result as mere collateral damage, making both sides come off as different brands of dicks. David Tennant looks like he's having a blast the entire time and he and Michael Sheen seem to have good chemistry together and the casting seems to work nicely. I'm told the series expands on certain characters and parts of the backstory somewhat, particularly a section midway through that shows the angel and demon continually meeting up at various times through human history, helping to better establish their relationship together.

If I had any major criticisms, its that the ending felt a bit anti-climatic with the last episode spending a good chunk of running time wrapping up peoples character arcs after the world "ended".

It definitely makes me want to read the book sometime in the near future.

666 beasts / 4 horsemen
 

Trunkage

Nascent Orca
Legacy
Jun 21, 2012
8,697
2,881
118
Brisbane
Gender
Cyborg
Lucifer Season 4
Pretty good. I dont think Maze cant act other than angry. Please dont give her anything other than that. Tom Ellis is a delight and clearly relishes the role. I liked the finale probably the best but found a certain actor doing this way too similar to his role in Preacher 8/10

Umbrella Academy
So, similar issues to ST:D. Way too focused on the interpersonal conflicts that generally don't help tell the story. Also, the apparent big bad was hurt by their family and wants tondestroy the whole planet? That certainly doesn't jive with that character's personality.

I dont know what to make of this show. Some cool concept wrapped up in nonsense 7/10

Jessica Jones
The genius is utterly stupid. He was originally threatening but he lives off his brother which also goes completely goes against his philosophy/MO. What a mess. Also, Lofe is Strange anyone?

I like it's take on heroism. Everyone manipulates too much and are becoming irredeemable 7/10
 

bluegate

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 28, 2010
2,339
942
118
I finally buckled and watched One Punch Man on Netflix, a charming little series indeed.
 

PsychedelicDiamond

Wild at Heart and weird on top
Legacy
Jan 30, 2011
1,933
763
118
Too Old To Die Young

Someone at Amazon Prime felt it was a good idea to give Nicholas Winding Refn, the Danish bad boy behind Drive, Only God Forgives and The Neon Demon, a ten episode television show. The result is mesmerizing, beautiful, socially aware, violent, cynical and about as slow as an Australian internet connection.

Too Old to Die Young is a 13 hour epic (you heard me right, while the length of individual episodes varies, most of them range from 1 hour to 1 hour and 30 minutes) about... well... about what, exactly? On face value, about a cop in Los Angeles (Miles Teller) descending deeper and deeper into its violent underworld after the murder of his partner. But there's also the mexican cartel member (Augusto Aguilera) who murdered his partner. And his mysterious girlfriend (Cristina Rodlo). And an Ex-FBI vigilante (John Hawkes) who gets his targets from a mystically inclined blonde woman (Jena Malone). And the cops 17 year old lover (Nell Tiger Free) and her father (William Baldwin) a delightfully sleazy and eccentric oligarch. As corny and perhaps overused this phrase is, the protagonist of Too Old to Die Young might very well be the city of Los Angeles, one single episode journey New Mexico and another one to... regular Mexico aside. The LA mystery has always been a genre on its own and Refn has set out to create a variation that's bleaker than Chinatown, more mystical than Mulholland Drive, more narcotic than Inherent Vice and timelier than Under the Silver Lake. Never has there been a depiction of LA that's more beautiful or more cynical. Refn presents it as a sun bleached, neon drenched nightmare, a place of unimaginable terror and unimaginable beauty, where dark secrets lurk behind every single corner. I described Under the Silver Lake as presenting the LA Mystery as a guided tour. TOTDY couldn't be farther from that. Rather than being guided through the cities seedier side from the inside of a bus with bulletproof windows it feels like waking up naked right in one of their darkest corners under the influence of various hallucinogenics.

TOTDY is surely a very interesting work, it's just... well, it's slow, at points excessively so. Shots linger on and on, between almost every single line of dialogue is a long, meaningful pause, conversations take forever to get to the point, it's very hard not to get distracted. It's loose approach to plot arguably works to its benefit. Once you realize that it's not building up towards a definitive climax or conclusion it becomes easier to simply go with the flow and embrace it as a maximalist portrait of a specific place rather than a narrative. And as much as the series is concerned with mood and style, it most definitely has clear themes and messages to back them up. It presents an uncompromising view of the urban American wasteland (and briefly one of rural America and Mexico that's no less bleak), a society at the verge of collapse, dystopian, not post-apocalyptic but pre-apocalyptic, a world just moments before its descent into violence so extreme it might mark the collapse of civilization. The world it depicts surely is an exaggerated one. We see the officers of the LAPD, depicted as a bunch overgrown fratboys, gleefully chant "FASCISM, FASCISM!" at a meeting, we see a preacher in New Mexico talk about the holy power of the Swastika, we see Teller's ex-cop hunt down the producers of unsimulated rape porn. It's pulp, when you get down to it, but Refn treats it with cerebral sincerity that dares you not to take it seriously.

Overall To Old To Die Young reperesents both the advantages and disadvantages of auteur driven television. It's both profound and indulgent, meaningful and silly, artistic and sleazy, fascinating and hard to watch. It's not nearly as unpredictable as Lynch's return to Twin Peaks or as entertaining as Paolo Sorrentino's Young Pope and I'm sure many people will find it unengaging if not downright boring. But it's nevertheless a unique, meaningful and artistically challenging work with amazing production values and quite a few things to say. It's difficult to recommend but if this description makes you suspect that you might be the target audience for it you might just find it wort your while.
 
Mar 30, 2010
3,785
0
0
Star Trek: Discovery - 3/10

The problem facing all prequels (the JJ Abrams films included) is the desire to make them look newer, flashier and snazzier than the originals. It wasn't until young Spock was introduced that I realised I was watching a show based before the original series - I had assumed looking at the ultra high tech ship, it's unheard-of phase drive, holographic comms gear etc that I was watching something placed a hundred years or so *after* Voyager. But no. And so we have to bumble through this awful premise that yes, we have all of this crazy super sci-fi era shit, but no, we're not going to tell anyone about it because 'official secrets act'. And don't even get me started on plots that rely on alternate dimensions and time travel as central mechanics. It was well acted though, and I did appreciate the number of non-humans in the crew, but that's about it. Other than that it was a slog to get through both seasons, and the last episode (or should I say two episodes) were just plain awful. 20 minutes of actual climactic battle interspersed between 70 minutes of characters telling one another how they've come to respect and love one another and saying their final goodbyes in mournful slow-mo. We even have the protagonist's parents turn up just before everything kicks off - now: Sarek has sensed that his daughter is in danger, so does he turn up with reinforcements? A small taskforce of Vulcan ships to aid in the coming battle? Nope. He and his wife rock up in a shuttle pod *just* to tell our heroine that they love her and are proud of her *and always have been* before simply turning round and fucking off back home again! The whole finale was just one long sop to the need of the modern generation for affirmation and positive reinforcement, and it ended quite a bad series on an utterly cringeworthy note.

Easily the worst Star Trek series of the whole lot. Come back, Deep Space Nine, all is forgiven.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,173
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Titans: Season 1 (3/5)

At the end of the day, this series is actually really stupid.

I'm not saying that because it's superhero fare, I'm saying that because of its extreme tonal whiplash. Remember the ads for this, how Robin's "fuck Batman" moment had people declaring it would be terrible? Well, that moment isn't bad in of itself, and it isn't even that representative of the show's problems as a whole. But if it was a case of the producers trying to do a "dark and gritty" moment, then yes, it is partially systemic.

Okay, thing is, the show's premise is absolutely bonkers. Like, no different from the Titans as a whole, right? Rachel/Raven has a demon inside her, and an alien who's lost her memory wants to help her, not knowing that she's come to Earth to kill her. Also, we've got a guy that can turn into a green tiger, and Dick Grayson, a.k.a. Robin, a.k.a. dark and tortured guy. Also the Doom Patrol, and casual sex, and Superman, and torture, and vigilantism, and PTSD/sexual abuse, and...okay, are you starting to see the problem here? Titans takes itself seriously. But I can't take it seriously when the aesthetic is so dour, and the costumes look like cosplay. I think the show actually kind of knows this - Robin/Dick fights a lot, but most of the time he's in civie clothes. I think the show's aware that most superheroes would just be shot in the real world if they did crimefighting without guns and the like. I mean, except Batman in the last episode, who shows the viewer why he's the god damn Batman, and why even SWAT teams with automatic weapons are no match for the god damn Batman, but congratulations, that's a dream sequence. I mean, when we have Donna Troy/Wonder Girl rolling around before using the Lassoo of Truth, while wearing civie clothes, in a house out in the rust belt, it isn't some grand moment, it looks like a fan film. I mean, people complain about the DCEU being too dark, but this is, I feel, actually worthy of the critique. Not that being dark is bad, but it is bad when there's such a tonal clash. I mean, FFS, did we really need it to be explained that Beast Boy has to strip naked every time he transforms? I mean, yes, it makes sense, but my suspension of disbelief can extend to clothes y'know, you're already asking me to deal with demons, and aliens, and every other piece of bonkers stuff the DC Universe has. Least the Doom Patrol episode actually knows it's bonkers, sort of.

So, in spite of all this, why's this a 3, rather than a 2? In truth, I dunno. The show's insane, and not in a good way, but it didn't irritate me so much that I'd call it bad. But it isn't good. It's crazy, but not the good kind of crazy that Teen Titans Go is (yes, I said it). It's crazy, but too dour to be an enjoyable kind of crazy. I guess it makes Robin the most viable member of the team for once, but only because everyone else is nerfed. Like, the Arrowverse shows are a mixed bag, and they can get as crazy as hell (see Legends of Tomorrow), but at least they usually keep themselves isolated from each other, so I don't need to rationalzie that the Green Arrow is on the level of the Flash for instance. But this? Bleh. Not good, but bleh.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,173
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
The 100: Season 2 (4/5)

The 100 Season 2 is better than Season 1 about 4 times out of 5. That may be an odd thing to say, but I'll put it this way - in most ways, season 2 improves off season 1. However, in some key ways, it falls short. So to that end, I'm going to get into its shortcomings first.

S2 is slightly looser with its science than S1. Now, The 100 isn't exactly "hard" sci-fi, but at least in S1, there was a noticable commitment to at least make it feel "hard" in a number of ways, at least when it came to the Ark. As in, in regards to the dilemma of getting to the ground, the orbital mechanics felt accurate - can't comment if they were, but it felt that way. The mutations on the ground at times felt like something out of the Transall Saga, but it never felt too out there - like, far away from the level of insanity in Fallout for instance. S1 doesn't exactly commit to scientific realism, but it always had one foot in the bucket of said realism. S2 however, leaves only a toe. For instance, Thelonious gets to Earth, because there just happens to be a missile left on the Ark that wasn't mentioned to now, and he can somehow ride it down to Earth. In less than 100 years, the "Mountain Men" of Mount Weather have completely lost their immunity to radiation, and are so sensitive to it that stepping outside will kill them. Apparnetly Grounder/Sky People blood can give them temporary immunity, and bone marrow can give them total immunity. Now, I get that there's arguably some precedent for this, but it's a noticable stretch of credulity when previously, the series was much "harder" with its science. You can argue that by the year 2052, medicine improvements allowed for this tech to be used, but I can just as easily argue that improvements in medicine should have allowed for better radiation treatment. Also, we've got an AI at the end, and Ark Security gets guns from a depot that the 100 visited last season, because the kids just happened to miss them there. Um, okay. S2 is noticably less tight in its worldbuilding and science than S1, even if it actually expands the world in other ways. Like, the Grounders have their own language now, that was conveniently absent in season 1, and I'm asked to believe that 97 years is long enough for a language to develop. Like, would English change? Yes. Would it change so much as to become unrecognisable? Yes. Makes even less sense that only Grounder warriors can speak English, so somehow they developed an English spin-off, while retaining the original language intact. Um, okay.

Right, now that that's out of the way, let's get into what the season does right. Basically, what S1 got right, namely its characters. S1 kind of pulled a bait and switch in its trailers, making you think it was a teen drama, but quickly dispelled that notion within its first few episodes, as people started dying very quickly, very horribly. S2 continues down the path of "this is a harsh world," but any traces of teen drama are long gone by now. I think the show actually knows it, considering that characters like Clarke and Bellamy are now on par (in terms of level of influence/authority) with the actual adult characters. I won't go into every character (I will mention that Octavia is now bearable, so that's an achievement in of itself) but suffice to say, every character feels "real," and there's a constant sense of unease, with alliances being tested, frayed, broken. Like, not Game of Thrones level, but enough that you can't really name any "bad" faction or character, and you're constantly guessing as to how things are going to end...which isn't well. Like, tragically not well. S2 is, at the end of the day, a tragedy, and it's a pretty damn good tragedy at that. So good that even as the plotline for season 3 is teased in its last couple of episodes, I found myself asking why it couldn't just end, because I don't see them topping this season. And from what I've read online, the CW never did, that the show apparently peaked in season 2 and never got its groove back. I don't know if that's true, but...yeah. This season is really, really good, and it's building off a prior season that was already downright solid. If you're a stickler for the science, maybe season 1 will be more your thing, but at the end of the day, I can't imagine S1 existing without S2 at this point.

So, yeah. Really good stuff. If you haven't watched the 100 yet, and were possibly put off by the trailers, I really advise you give it a chance. Because if you're looking for a series with strong characters that develop over time (sometimes for better, sometimes for worse), with grey morality, solid plot, and reasonably solid worldbuilding, and post-apocalyptic sci-fi is something you enjoy, then you should probably enjoy this. If S1 is the "YA" part of the story, then S2 is the "A" in more ways than one.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,173
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Black Lightning: Season 1 (3/5)

Black Lightning and Titans are both DC-based TV shows, but are on opposite ends of he spectrum. On the one hand, Titans is utterly bonkers. On the other, Black Lightning is utterly drab. I bring this up because after having seen Titans, and having finished the first season of BL, I feel that's the show's most pertinent issue summed up - it's BORING. The protagonists are boring. The antagonists are even more boring. The music...okay, can't call the music bad, but it isn't my thing. What's more, there's kind of a crisis of identity going on in the show. Because on one hand, it's political, or at least, trying to be - poverty, drug use, police brutality, Confederate monuments, a Charlottsville equivalent, racism in general, etc. On the other hand, when you have spandex-wearing superheroes walking or jogging around, there's a kind of tonal whiplash that this is a world where real-world problems exist, along with problems that...AREN'T, real world. I can't believe I'm saying this, as someone who thought having Arrow and The Flash in the same universe was a bad move, but I've found myself wishing that the show was in the Arrowverse, because the whole metahumans thing feels really out of place here. Existing in a wider universe where green light isn't the only method of getting powers would kind of make the show more palatable for me.

Remember when I said this show was political? Well, credit where credit is due, it's much, MUCH better than Arrow's piss-poor attempts at it. And it at least has the guts to delve into the issues I mentioned above, while Supergirl did it through analogy, albeit analogy with the subtlety of a brick. I mean...oh God, am I talking about other shows rather than this? Well, I'm sorry Black Lightning, but you're BORING. Like, I think I might have liked you more if you dropped the superhero stuff and just focused on socio-political themes, because the two things just clash so much.

So, yeah. That's Black Lighting. Has a bit of a spark, but there's no echo of thunder. Just a smouldering ember where the lightning struck.
 

Trunkage

Nascent Orca
Legacy
Jun 21, 2012
8,697
2,881
118
Brisbane
Gender
Cyborg
Gotham. Final season. This show is nuts with so much backstabbing and unrealistic situations but tries to ground it in reality. It sort of only just works and this season was no different. Another season where they jump the shark at least once an episode. 6/10

Doom Patrol. You know, not too different from Gotham. Pretty crazy. They do try and ground it but this is far more effective. There is way more character growth here and they delve deep into the mistakes of each character. They really lean into the bunch of misfits and outdo Guardians of the Galaxy by a long way. The ending was set up to be different from a normal story which is good but the execution was not the best. Danny and Nobody were also fun.

Frasier is clearly no where near the set and the movement of Robotman does not match his inflection. Probably the same for negative man but its not as noticeable.

Extra points for Admiral Whiskers' Indigo Montoya routine. 8/10
 

Baffle

Elite Member
Oct 22, 2016
3,459
2,746
118
Derry Girls. It's enjoyable, though having never been to Ireland I'm sure I'm missing much of the nuance (assuming there is some I'm missing).
 

Chimpzy_v1legacy

Warning! Contains bananas!
Jun 21, 2009
4,789
1
0
The Wire

It's been a decade since I last watched it, so I'm giving it another go. That's all I'm going to say about it. Anyone who's seen it doesn't need any further explanation. Anyone who hasn't seen it only need to know one thing: you should watch The Wire.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,173
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
trunkage said:
Doom Patrol. You know, not too different from Gotham. Pretty crazy. They do try and ground it but this is far more effective. There is way more character growth here and they delve deep into the mistakes of each character. They really lean into the bunch of misfits and outdo Guardians of the Galaxy by a long way. The ending was set up to be different from a normal story which is good but the execution was not the best. Danny and Nobody were also fun.
How would you say it compares to Titans (if you've seen it)?
 

Kyrian007

Nemo saltat sobrius
Legacy
Mar 9, 2010
2,565
649
118
Kansas
Country
U.S.A.
Gender
Male
Stranger Things: Season 3 (6/10)

It was fine. I could have done without the vomit-inducing garishness of the accurately depicted 80's shopping mall it takes place in. It really didn't break any new ground, still a dual villain of horror from the "upside down" and shadowy government trying to "harness" the dark powers. I won't spoil, but they did one daring thing and took a chance with some fairly bold storytelling right at the end... and couldn't even get out without undoing it in a post-credit scene making it meaningless.

I'm not saying I need one of the main cast kids to die, but currently I'm going into every episode with the same confidence they are all going to live as I am watching The Goonies for the 6th or 7th time. They should kill or maim and cripple one of those kids, just to prove they can and might. Otherwise it is becoming pretty toothless, horror-wise. Personally I'd chose Dustin. Yup, I know he has kind of become the heart of the piece... that's exactly why you rip that heart out and make it as bloody and terrible as you possibly can.

It is still focusing on being a small town character piece with occasional monsters. And it would be fine at that, but they are highlighting some bad writing doing so. Horror doesn't have to rely on people making dumb decisions (don't go in there, lets split up, must have been my imagination, ect?) but it often does. Correspondingly, drama doesn't have to rely on people making dumb decisions and yet ST is writing its drama in a very similar fashion. Examples, Hopper "I don't know if this kid who literally risked his life several times for my daughter is good enough to date my daughter" and Mike "I don't think I have to show any respect for this guy who literally risked his life to save and protect the girl I love." Realistically there shouldn't be much conflict between these 2 characters... so the writers make each MASSIVELY STUPID to inject some drama into the situation. Eleven needs a permanent home, so by the end of season 3 she goes to live with... Joyce, Will, and Jonathan? What the hell? Lets burden the single mom with the smallest house as opposed to El living with... anybody else would have been a better fit. Mike's family has a huge house and seemingly plenty of income, ditto Dustin who can afford fairly expensive stuff. Nope, it has to be the family struggling to get by. And the drama it adds is slightly spoiler-ey so
Joyce is leaving town, she can't deal with Hopper's death. (that they walked back in the post credits scene) So the dumb choice is being made to inject the drama of long distance relationships between El and Mike and Jonathan and Nancy.

And FFS, why aren't we doing anything more with Mr. Clarke. He's the best teacher ever and an interesting character. Screw #justiceforBarb... give us some more Mr. Clarke.

Its still good, but I'm losing my patience with it to deliver an experience as good as season one.
 

Trunkage

Nascent Orca
Legacy
Jun 21, 2012
8,697
2,881
118
Brisbane
Gender
Cyborg
Hawki said:
trunkage said:
Doom Patrol. You know, not too different from Gotham. Pretty crazy. They do try and ground it but this is far more effective. There is way more character growth here and they delve deep into the mistakes of each character. They really lean into the bunch of misfits and outdo Guardians of the Galaxy by a long way. The ending was set up to be different from a normal story which is good but the execution was not the best. Danny and Nobody were also fun.
How would you say it compares to Titans (if you've seen it)?
I didn't mind Titans. First episode was not great but gradually got better. But the Doom Patrol episode was probably the best. 6/10

Doom Patrol leans way more into the weirdness of the comic. It has Ezekiel, Beard Hunter and Danny and those are some strange characters if you know anything of the comics. Unlike most "loser" show/ movies, (see IT and me never really getting why they called themselves losers) these feel like real losers. They feel like they are really working through stuff. Titans didn't really do that.

I'd say at least two point above Titans, as long as you can handle the weirdness. Noting that I didn't hate Titans but wasn't excited for any more.

(One side note, as I cant remember how this was in Titans. There was a lot of melodrama between characters but I don't think it was forced like sometimes in ST:Discovery. More like a DS9 level where the inter-group conflicts usually felt real. But not as good as Babylon 5 where people were placed in a path years in advance to heighten an internal conflict)
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,173
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic: Season 1 (3/5)

TBH, this is probably more a 3.5 out of 5, but if I had to choose between 3 and 4, I had to go with 3. Because this season...okay. I've commented in the past that if we look at MLP as a whole (and when I say MLP, I'm referring to G4 specificcally), then season 1 feels prototypical. I've voiced the theory that the shift from season 1 to 2 can be attributed in part to a shift in viewership. Like, along the line, Hasbro realized that they'd snagged a teenage to adult fanbase, and therefore, had to accomodate them. Having since done a "proper watch" of season 1, I think I have to reframe that statement a bit. Season 1 is arguably a lot more twee than later seasons, and I don't think I can attribute that entirely to the difference age I'm now at from when I first watched it. However, it isn't fair to say that it's "prototypical," because the foundations are in place here, and from what I've seen of the series, it never strayed significantly far away from them. However, season 1 is still 'tame' compared to later seasons, which over time, would focus less time on "friendship lessons" and more time on what I call 'adventure episodes' or 'wacky episodes.' Season 1 isn't entirely without these, but the adventure side of things is very tame, and the wacky episodes, while there, are very much the minority.

So, is that to say that the season is bad? No. But "tame" is the operative word. Assuming season 2 is as good as I remember it, then I remain tempted to say that newcomers should start with season 2 and then go back to season 1 later. There's certainly some gems here, but overall, this was a moment in MLP's history where it was aiming for the children demographic, and pretty much stuck there. So, not bad, but what MLP became is something noticably different from what it started out as, and while the evolution was pretty natural, it's a noticable evolution regardless.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,173
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Black Lightning: Season 2 (2/5)

So, yeah. 2/5. By my scale, that gives this season a stamp of "bad." Not so much because of what this season does, but because of what it doesn't, namely give me an emotional connection with the characters. I kind of touched on this stuff in the review I did of season 1, but I'm going to try and detail here why this show just doesn't work for me. I'm also going to compare it to the Arrowverse shows, because while not part of that universe, it's still produced by the CW.

First of all, the music, and ergo, the fight scenes. There's a constant barrage of what I guess one could call "black music," as in, blues or jazz. Okay, fair enough - like the constant presence of religion, not my preferred genres, but sure, whatever. However, I draw the line when these tracks are played over fight scenes. I can't help but reflect that the first two seasons of Arrow gave us villains like Dark Archer and Slade, and that the first two seasons of The Flash gave us Reverse-Flash and Zoom. The first two seasons of Black Lightning have had...um...street thugs and a corrupt businessman. Yes, I know, there's been some metas, but while Flash got creative with its villain roster, Black Lightning hasn't. So when there are fights, it's slowly, it's lethargic, it's boring. The action is anemic, as are the emotional stakes. Yes, our protagonists have a grudge against the big bad (Tobias Shaw), but it's a hollow connection, at least in regards to the action. The fight scenes on the CW they, well, MOVED, and you can't attribute that to lack of super speed or anything, because even Arrow pulled it off.

Second issue is the pacing. I'm not just referring to individual scenes here, I'm referring to the plodding of the season itself. It's slow. Really slow. It's actually a shorter season length than the average CW show, but it just goes on, and on, and on. Like, with a season in serialized television, there's usually a pace, a flow, that picks up towards the climax or whatnot. Here, it starts slow, and it keeps being slow. It's hard to explain, and it might be less to do with actual flow and more to do with lack of interest, but there's a constant sense of plodding in this season, and by extension, the other one. Which is arguably odd, as our titular hero can't even go a full season without getting a sidekick (Thunder), and I will grant it that it does the whole "family with powers" thing far better than The Flash ("you get powers, and you get powers, everyone gets powers!"), but it isn't enough to save it

Third of all...okay, fine. Let's talk about racism. Black Lightning deals with racism. I admit I'm feeling guilty as to what counts as a good exploration of racism here and what counts as a bad one, so all I can say is that sometimes it does it well, sometimes...not so well. But this does tie into what I said earlier, that the show feels chained to its genre. It can only explore racism so far without returning to what is obstensibly its roots, in that yes, this is a guy with lightning powers, and the audience is expecting those powers to be used. Supergirl has never shied from political themes, but it almost always explored those themes through analogy. What hampered it is that it was analogy with the subtlety of a brick, among other things. Black Lightning on the other hand explores its themes directly, or at least tries to. Because again, it can only go so far without being yanked off the ground of reality into half-hearted lightning, thunder, and fire stuff.

Also the Blackbird hoodie is cooler than any of the actual costumes. Just saying.

So, no, I'm not fond of Black Lightning. I like it less than Arrow, Flash, Supergirl, and heck, even Legends of Tomorrow. LoT is basically "Doctor Who, but for people who want pew pew rather than dialogue," but there's a kind of grim pleasure to be gained in the insanity. Black Lightning is too serious for that. And a serious show is fine, but its seriousness is at odds with its genre. At this point, I'm not even sure making it part of the Arrowverse would help it, because its take on metahumans is so different from the Flash, that it would be hard to imagine they belong in the same universe. I mean, that would be like putting mutants in the MCU and contriving a reason for people to be afraid of them despite already being familiar with whacky shit. I mean, who would do that?

Oh. Wait...
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,173
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Star Trek: Short Treks: Season 1 (4/5)

So, it's kind of dubious as to whether this warrants a review, because it's tied to Discovery. Still, the Short Treks series is grouped by season, so ergo, I can review the season. And as an aggregate, Short Treks: Season 1, is better than either season of Discovery.

Funny thing is, it kind of follows the so-called Star Trek movie rule, in that the even-numbered episodes are better than the odd-numbered one. Ep. 1 with Tilly and "alien princess girl" (forget her name) is the weakest - it's basically feel-good stuff that requires me to believe that alien girl can somehow get on and off Discovery without anyone noticing. Episode 2 is much better though - nothing sci-fi hasn't done before, as a man is trapped onboard a spaceship with an AI that may or may not develop feelings for him, but it's well done. Though I have to ask about spoilers, I mean, we now know the fate of the actual USS Discovery, so...yay? Episode 3 is okay. Episode 4 is bloody hilarious. Honestly, at this point, I like Discoery-Mudd more than TOS-Mudd, because the latter is blood hilarious while also a bit psychopathic, while the latter was only slightly hilarous and a bit pathetic.

So, yeah. Good stuff.
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,114
1,865
118
Country
USA
New show, "The Boys" on Amazon Prime Streaming. It is sort of like, what if John McClain decided the JLA needed a major spanking (including killing) upon occasion as are abusive to humanity. I read it is based upon a comic book. So far, it is dark and terrific.
 

Dalisclock

Making lemons combustible again
Legacy
Escapist +
Feb 9, 2008
11,241
7,020
118
A Barrel In the Marketplace
Country
Eagleland
Gender
Male
(Re)Watching Neon Genesis Evangelion on Netflix. Intially kinda put off because all the VA have been changed up and I was so used to the originals, despite not having watched the series since 2012. Now that it's back in the news again(SuperBunnyHop and Writing on Games both talked about it recently) and the fact the 4th rebuild film is apparently FINALLY coming out next year(8 years after the last one), I felt I should give it another try.

I keep forgetting how slow the first couple episodes are. The intro to NERV and Tokyo 3 is a bit of a slow burn and then there's the entire episode of Shinji riding the damn train for what feels like forever during his hissy fit. It does pick up after that and gets a nice rythem, before of course plunging into an emotional death spiral starting around the series midpoint all the way up that bleak acid trip ending(The movie, the series ending was just more bizarre and introspective due to the complete lack of money).

I do still like it and while Shinji does get annoying at times, he was physiologically and emotionally unfit to ever be put in that position to begin with, both by virtue of Gendos complete neglect and emotional abuse and the fact he's literally a child soldier being not quite forced but heavily pressured into fighting lovecraftian horrors on a near constant basis. Then again, few other cast members are exactly models of emotional health either, which makes it quite fitting when it's revealed much later that no matter how well they did,
They were all screwed from the beginning

Strangely enough, it also reminds me of LOST in a way, with mysteries piled on top of mysteries, except unlike LOST, it doesn't drag on and does reach a conclusion after a relatively brief period of time(having a single season and a film helps). It does suffer that context from a lot of the questions in the show comes from the Manga or the obscure Japanese Video-games that haven't really been translated or exported and even then it only makes a little more sense.

So yeah, 5 Evas/18 angels.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,173
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Voltron: Legendary Defender: Season 3 (3/5)

So, funny story. I reached the point where I went back into Netflix to start season 4, only to see that the episode was labelled as Season 4, ep. 2. Frowning, I checked the episode list and realized I'd gone from season 3 to season 4 without even realizing it. Considering the massive drop off in episode number per season post-season 2, maybe that isn't surprising.

Well, whatever. I've talked at length about the first two seasons already. Season 3 is an improvement over them, but that's not to say that it's "good." I've said it before and I'll say it again - when you're throwing around terms like "fate of the unvierse," and have characters apparently able to travel between galaxies at will, there's no real sense of scale. Everything becomes so big as for me to lose investment in it. Still, season 3 does improve a bit in that there's a bit more of an impetus for the plot. Galra Empire's starting to crumble. Lotor comes out, but does his own thing. More and more planets are rebelling. I mentioned before that the first two seasons kind of just stumbled to the end of the season 2 finale, with no real buildup from "new lion paladins" to "we're going to take out Zarkon and end this," but season 3 does alleviate it somewhat.

You know what it doesn't alleviate? Colour. Like, Keith ends up piloting Black Lion, Lance ends up piloting Red Lion, and Allura ends up piloting Blue Lion...and none of their uniforms change to match it. In the words of Schafillas to Lance, "wear red you hack!" Oh, and the alteans have evil dimensional counterparts that appear for one episode, potentially demonstrating that alteans aren't inherently good, and galra aren't inherently evil...and they never get mentioned again, nor is this really reflected on. Least what I've seen so far.

So, yeah. That's VLD S3. Fine, average, but nothing special.