Nikluz said:
Ok, I am vastly aware that countries such as china and russia outnumber ours, but countries such as china, not russia, are barely trained and therefore would have strength in numbers but not much else. So assumeing we ever got on a one on one war, with nuclear weapons excluded, we would win in the long run. By largest army, I did not only mean the actual army, I meant the entire military, and you cannot argue that our military isnt more diverse and better rounded in every field. By that I mean our ground troops, navy, and air force are all well trained so that we could completely dominate the battlefield, not like Britain 300 years ago that was almost completely dependent on its navy, which led to them losing the revolution. Some countries, like england, do compensate there small size by training their armies to maxium strength. Still we have the best trained special operations forces, so much so that they did what no other country could, we took down Osama bin Laden. I am not trying to be the guy that thinks America is the greatest because of that.
And you said yourself that we are the center of world affairs. Scientists such as Albert Einstein relinquished their past citizenship to become an American, it doesnt matter where they were it matters where they are, america. America also does have all the resources we require. We produse our own oil, wood, food, and plastics. Now while we do import those very same products so that in the event of an emergency quarentine we could continue to function, our standard of living would be hindered, we could still continue to live. And the company with the best product will always win.
Now on to healthcare, did you know that canada switched from universal healthcare to private companies because it was more efficent. Free healthcare should be extended to only the unemployed or disabled, and if you knew anything about America you would know that we have Medicare, a tax based goverment run company. We also have free clinics, they are doctors offices available to, you geust it, everyone free of charge. The step from private to universal healthcare is a step in the direction of more goverment control, as the goverment is then limiting the economy of their country, it is the first step into socialism.
Also the best product wins, take Apple for instance, they rule the computer market because they always put out the best product and therefore make the most profit. And you cant stop the like 8% of the time someone piggeybacks off their parents fortune, just get over it, dont make everyone that is "rich" suffer for someone getting off easy.
I hate to be all over the map but, how dare you critize our goverment, how is it crumbling? At least we're not having riots in the streets and a goverment too scared to take control of the situation. The riots wouldnt be as bad as they are for suvillians if you all would have second amendment rights, in your country only criminals have guns.
On a seperate note, have you ever been to america, you cant judge a country if you've never been there. Also you say that we think that we're the best, we didnt put our flag poles down where ever we felt like it and say its ours. Back in the day you guys thought that you owned everything, you can say what you want but we dont act like that. You guys are so full of yourself you are too prideful to switch over to the Euro, you just have to stick to the Pound. Also you are the only country in the European Union to have a parliment. How do you think that your better than us, that in it's self is an overzealous form of pride. Know what you're talking about before you post it.
That's a lot of text to read through from both of us. I've split it up to make it easier for readers and for me to counter argue.
Lets start out of with blaize2010,
Please notice at NO point did I say Britain is better than America, at NO point did I say Britain doesn't have idiots, and I never said that a countries image is what actually is.
What I did say is that, America's image doesn't portray them as intelligent, and their governments actions in the world seems to uphold that image.
If anyone is still confused look at ChaosBorne's post as that is pretty much what I think.
Now to reply to Nikluz.
First, never assume. Assumption is the mother of all mistakes. Don't underestimate numbers and don't EVER forget tactics. America pretty much lost the Vietnam war due to weak tactics, despite outmanning and being better equipped. And I would like to remind you China was once a mastermind at tactics having produced Sun Tzu, Sun Pin etc. I don't know how good their tactics are today, but with a history like China I really wouldn't want to test it.
Second on the army, yes America does have a well rounded army and that makes it versatile. However being versatile also means you have no strengths or weaknesses. Also I'd like to point out for your history sake, that the reason the American Revolution came off successfully, not so much that our Navy was the stronger point, but because other countries in Europe decided to help you.
Finally on the army, I really REALLY cannot believe you brought the taking down of Osama Bin Laden into this. Hooray you found one man and killed him. A man you didn't find by yourself. One man who was more likely to be a figurehead chosen by BOTH sides for the press. So that people have a target to hate.
Out of the army now, onto commerce. You can't PRODUCE oil you mine it. Like you can't produce metal. But that was petty so I'll give you something more tangible.
http://www.worldsrichestcountries.com/top_us_imports.html
That sounds like a lot of imports for a country that could be self sufficient. Now don't get me wrong there are few countries that could be self sufficient and nearly all of them are not 1st world countries. Its gotten to the point where we NEED free trade, to keep going at this point in time.
Brilliant back to health care. Medicare, is for people over 65 and those with disabbilities. Last I checked that wasn't all its people. So, it matters how ill or old you are if you get free treatment. But why shouldn't that then extend to others? In death we are all equal. So shouldn't that also apply to the sick?
Plus a National Health Service, doesn't stop private hospitals, and economy doesn't stagnate even if it did. Why? Because the government pays its employers, and its people pays that through taxes. A flow of money. No stagnancy in economy. Stagnancy occurs where money doesn't come out or flow e.g. if the government took taxes and didn't pay its employees.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publicly-funded_health_care
I approve of the two tier system.
Finally yes it does give the government more control, but really not that much more than it already has. I mean it can't be more power than getting every child to say the Pledge of Allegiance. You do realise taking power out of the government is a socialist view point? Extreme socialism=No Government (basically, of course that is an over simplification)
Quick question though what is wrong with socialism? Just curious, all forms of government has its positives and negatives. Why is going slightly more socialist a bad thing? Of course there are problems with all extremes. Socialism, mobs. Communism, laziness. Democracy, inefficient. Dictatorship, too much power for one person. etc.
I really don't have anything to say on Apple, but I will say this. Its main selling point is its simplicity in comparison to Microsoft. Kind of like what Nintendo did with the Wii.
Erm, I don't think I ever used the term crumbling. What I think you were referring to is how I said it makes bad decisions in terms of world relations. Now all governments make bad decisions, but certain decisions people remember and dislike more than others.
If I need to go further think of Team America. Then get back to me.
I'm assuming you meant "Civilians", otherwise ignore this paragraph.
http://gallery.mobile9.com/f/155503/
Police have guns too, besides the guy with the gun is always more likely to be shot than someone without one. Plus it keeps gun crime low, its knife crime thats more the worry here.
Hmm, *typing in moon landing into google images*
As you ask, yes I have been to America. Several times to several different places. I've also been to France, Germany, Switzerland, Denmark, Italy, Oman, Saudi Arabia, and am actually planning a trip to Japan. I am also well versed in French, German and Japanese.
And I'll probably visit many more countries before I die.
I say all this, and I've been to those places for the same reason, because I like seeing the diversity between countries and societies, in comparison to the ones I know. And when I see things like McDonalds and other signs of westernisation, I die a little inside. Why? Because it destroys what was once unique, and turns it into just another America wannabe.
Its not so much I dislike America, but more the dominant nature its affect on the world has been. I don't want more Americas, anymore than I want more Britains or Japans. One of each country is quite enough for me.
Its also why I don't like the idea of the Euro. But getting onto the Euro, if we did then we would have to legally bail out any country in the European Union. To put it in your terms imagine if Americans taxes were going to South America instead.
I would also like to point out I never said Britain was better than America. I just think Americas pride needs to be taken down a few notches. Like saying you could be self sufficient. Now there is nothing wrong with a bit of pride for ones country, but I think America takes it too far.
Also,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_of_Italy
I would like to echo your own piece of advice,
Nikluz said:
Know what you're talking about before you post it.
Finally, (this took too long to write) I never claimed any country to be better or worse than any other country. Each country makes decisions I don't like, the French Burqa Ban, The English Coalition, and America fighting so hard against "Obamacare" etc.
I really don't know where you got the impression of "overzealous pride" beyond me making criticisms to America, and saying only two things I think England does better. Both those things most of Europe do anyway. Its not just England that has UHC (Canada DOES) or trains their troops more extensively to maximise each soldier (Japan). Its just I mentioned this country cause I KNOW those two facts are correct for this one.
There are aspects of America that I do think it does best e.g. entertainment industry, internal transport