I don' care if it's realistic or not as long as it's pretty.
And Arkham Asylum is pretty. It might just be the best looking game out there.
And Arkham Asylum is pretty. It might just be the best looking game out there.
No, it doesn't. Realistic means concern for fact or reality and rejection of the impractical and visionary.Pegghead said:No, no I do not. Realistic basically means a whole lot of brown (Farcry 2, GOW) and I hate those graphics.
101194 said:The Graphics should help the Gameplay and progress the Story. That's about all that matters for me.
Yeah I actually want that idea...I am a fan of technology type interfaces and stuff like that (which are actually seen in many FPSs)...But the idea is good FPS=realistic graphicCurtmiester said:It all depends on the game. An FPS should (if thats their style). But something like Pokemon? O god no.
Hey everyone, Uber Newb here *yeah, original, I know.* Long time visitor, first time poster. Be gentle.apsham said:I am just going to say that games are never going to have photo-realstic graphics and\or be decent in my lifetime.. so any attempt to do so is only going to land things in the uncanny valley (Bethesda, I am looking at you). I'm a fan of immersion but fuck that meaning realistic as possible graphics.