You are wrong. It exists I have a story about it, but that story stays with me the first time I tell it is not going to be to some strangers on the internet. But yes love exists
this. Even though I've never been in love, (or if I have I'm denying it.) but I can tell by looking at my friends that loves exists.Sneaky-Pie said:If you don't believe in love, you have never been in love.
Love is subjective, so you are very right.Jacco said:What do you think? Am I right? Wrong? Why?
There is nothing in this paragraph inconsistent with love. Once you understand that, you're there.Jacco said:I fall into the latter category. Ive seen too man people who "love" each other hurt their partners in ways that cannot be described. Elderly people who have been married 40 or 50 years will tell you straight up they are glad their spouse died because they were just so sick of being around them ALL THE TIME.
Well, I'm only recently single from a rather long relationship, so I'm supposed to be bitter and skeptical about the love thing, especially as I got hurt pretty bad. But honestly? Love is real, it is a biological connection between people, not an abstract state, but it is very real.Jacco said:What do you think? Am I right? Wrong? Why?
Not at all bitter, eh?RAKtheUndead said:Love is a disgusting, malefic cankersore on the human species. It is among the most foul and horrific things imaginable, a punishment which gives one the mere illusion of happiness, when really, all that exists within the emotion is pain. I believe in it the same way I believe in war, chaos and death.
The same quote is true for 'happiness' or indeed 'life'...John Connor M said:I have no doubt someone else will say this but this quote pretty much sums up what I think:
"Love is just a chemical, we give meaning to it by choice."
(ala Bioshock 2)
That's sounds like the classic mantra of the hurt. What did she do?H31neken said:From your definition, the latter.
Basically, "love" is nothing more than an overflow of oxytocin and a few other chemicals in our brains. Our culture's overly romanticised view of "love", however, does not exist in real life. By which I mean "true love" as people call it.
In every shape and form, both real and made up, I find it to be pointless. Completely and utterly pointless.
I'm pretty certain the love I feel is not a temporary thing, but a thing that built up slowly over time which I cannot back down from.Jacco said:By that I mean, do you think it is a real, tangible thing that people can experience sincerely or do you feel it is just a temporary though powerful infatuation?
I fall into the latter category. Ive seen too man people who "love" each other hurt their partners in ways that cannot be described. Elderly people who have been married 40 or 50 years will tell you straight up they are glad their spouse died because they were just so sick of being around them ALL THE TIME.
People use love as an excuse to get married or have sex or whatnot and I think to myself whenever I hear that they are just deluding themselves. That it is just a temporary, if intense, crush.
I've also been told I'm wrong and that I won't really know it until I HAVE loved. I don't buy that. I've been in some serious relationships before with some pretty intense feelings but like all things, they just came to an end. I think love is just a fairy tale that doesn't translate to the real world.
What do you think? Am I right? Wrong? Why?