In civilization, I don't get mad if I lose a couple units in pursuit of conquering a city, but if it's on defense, it irks me quite a bit to say the least. If I lose a city, I rage-quit and start a new game
it's also just a good idea strategically to avoid loss at all costs, or the end of the game is going to be hard as hell.Kelethor said:Fire Emblem.
And im not talking that New fancy pants DS version where your characters are thrown around like paper and no one talks to you, im talking about Eliwood, Lyn and Hector, the three of them developing a bond that nothing can shatter. and not to mention the many other characters, all of whom were given emotional baggage....God, if lost even a single unit, I shut off the game. I made a promise to myself that I wouldn't leave a man behind.
It took my years to beat the game.
I know what you mean there, I worked a lowly soldier all the way up to general/family member and I lost him to the damn Brutti or /we they are called. I shed a tear for him.PatrickXD said:I feel bad about it, yeah. Forced me to think very strategically in Rome: TW.
This. Although I don't have OCD. I just thing things being incomplete is messy. I'm not helping my case am I?ultimateownage said:Yes. Most of the time it's just OCD playing up, because it means I don't have an 100% full army/unit.
Pretty much this. A marine?TheYellowCellPhone said:I only feel bad if it's an important unit. And it's more anger than an emotional attachment.
For example: Lose a pawn in chess. Oh well.
Lose a bishop in chess. NOOOOOOOO