The reason why this would never get NCAA recognition is the Snitch. Theres no way to make a person objectively fair equal and identical.
There were teams from Canada too. They can still call it a world cup, even if teams from further abroad are too poor to turn up.Karma168 said:Now while that does sound like quite a bit of a laugh and fun to play i have to ask, how can you have a world cup when only American university students take part? Doesn't 'world' imply several countries taking part?
There are teams from over several countries that take part, including England.Grey Carter said:There were teams from Canada too. They can still call it a world cop, even if teams from further abroad are too poor to turn up.Karma168 said:Now while that does sound like quite a bit of a laugh and fun to play i have to ask, how can you have a world cup when only American university students take part? Doesn't 'world' imply several countries taking part?
There are teams from Argentina, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Finland and of course the good' ol US of A taking part this year. Wish a British team would attend.Karma168 said:Now while that does sound like quite a bit of a laugh and fun to play i have to ask, how can you have a world cup when only American university students take part? Doesn't 'world' imply several countries taking part?
We have referees and umpires who are expected to be fair equal and identical in EVERY major sport I am aware of. In this game there is simply a third class of people on the field who like the teams are a part of the action but like the reffs are neutral.walrusaurus said:The reason why this would never get NCAA recognition is the Snitch. Theres no way to make a person objectively fair equal and identical.
In case you didn't watch the video, in this the snitch is only worth 30 points, compared to 10 for a regular goal. If you've got a decent human snitch, I'd imagine that the game would go long enough that the bonus points wouldn't represent an overly large proportion of the total score.lord.jeff said:Still a broken sport, unless the team completely outmatches it's opponent the only position worth note is the seeker.
Judging from the video, if you lose the brooms it's just too much like rugby.Superior Mind said:I get the appeal in turning fictional Quiddich into an actual sport, it works pretty well. I don't get why they force the players to straddle brooms though given that there is no purpose in that aside from looking ridiculous.
I'll have you know that I have several friends in that school, and their pants are just as mundane as yours or mine!Grey Carter said:including a team from the notoriously fancy-pants Johns Hopkins university
hmmmm...RAWR on second thought, it looks like fun. sign me up! =PReal Quidditch lacks magic but makes up for it with violence.
there is nothing betterDooly95 said:Hey, you know what we used to call this?
Calvinball.