Does anyone else agree RPGs should move into the modern era?

[bobtail123]

Actually I think that one of the charms of a modern day RPG would be the level of realism. People could try to live from an entirely different perspective from what they are used to, and thats probably a good thing.

Despite the age we live in being kind of boring I still think the appeal of being able to play a game set in this world, where you can do things that you all the things you would never be able to do in real life, would more than make up for that.

 

[Evilsanta]

There are some already out there. Search for Vampire: The Masqurade:Bloodlines.

Or check out Funcoms new MMO The Secret World. It plays out in the modern world and it doesn't look to bad...Then again it's a MMO.

 

[TheAmazingHobo]

Yup, like everyone's already said, plenty of modern RPGs. Most of them, in fact, are much better than the traditional fantasy/sci-fi RPGs such as Vampire: The Masquerade and Alpha Protocol (Which I will defend until my last breath as a flawed masterpiece).

I´m right there with you. It was a good game and I enjoyed the hell out of it.


On-topic:

How about this: We do not make any rules about what kind of setting WRPGs should or should not utilize. Instead, we just all agree that it would be pretty sweet, if more WRPGs explored unusual settings (such as all the different ""-punks, for example).
Which I think is a current trend anyway.

 

[The_root_of_all_evil]

My main problem with the middle ages is the godawful flute and string music. And basically all the arts and aesthetics sucked before the renaissance revitalized European societies. Really, I'd be happy with a simple 'renaissance onward only' rule.

Everything that I don't like sucks, is that it?

So, without checking, you've already decided that Vampire, Fallout, Wasteland, Matrix Online, Requiem, Syndicate and many other modern RPGs are actually just medieval. You've also ruled out Shadowrun, despite it having everything you've asked for.

What you want is only RPGs that are like COD. And FPSs that are like COD. And everything else sucks because you don't like the music.

It's not the most unbiased outlook, is it?

 

[Danzaivar]

Shenmue and Parasite Eve called. They was wondering why you're ignoring them.

 

[Amnestic]

There's a lot of hate on Alpha Protocol here I gotta say. I thought it was okay for the most part. I played a Stealth character too, and I only really had trouble with the one boss (Dude in the museum). I was doing the 'Recruit' playthrough so I had even fewer skillpoints than normal.

But yeah, OP seems to be willfully ignorant of a whole plethora of RPGs.

 

[Smooth Operator]

It's my humble assertion that modern RPGs would benefit in much the same way as Call of Duty did by going over to more contempary settings. JRPGs really started doing this after FFVII, mixing sci-fi elements in alongside the fantasy, though I'm yet to see something truly contempary besides Earthbound (though that game wasn't exactly realistic). I'd like to see the western mature RPGs ditch the middle ages in favour of the modern mega societies of today, edgy stories more inspired by films like Pulp Fiction (or anything Tarantino really) or No Country for Old Men.

I'd love to see Bethesda move the Elder Scrolls to a circa 2020 setting one day, using their experience with Fallout 3 to give us guns, cars AND magic. My main problem with the middle ages is the godawful flute and string music. And basically all the arts and aesthetics sucked before the renaissance revitalized European societies. Really, I'd be happy with a simple 'renaissance onward only' rule.

What are you proposing, a dictatorship?
You got RPG's all over the map, some even in the middle ages, so how about you look at those that aren't?
The only good game still working with the middle ages formula is Dragon Age, all the others are way out there, surely everyone can find something they like.
You may not see it from your point of view, but suggesting we ditch anything you don't like is rather silly.

 

[Snarky Username]

Mass Effect, also, Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic.
You are WAY behind the times.

Technically, Star Wars was set "In a time long, long ago" so that would hardly be modern.

OT: I don't think so. I prefer it to be either in the distant past or the distant future. I've kind of gotten used to the present just by living in it. Besides, there already are a few modern RPGs that you seem to be forgetting...

 

[Twuk]

Asking JRPGs to adopt a more 'modern' and western setting kind of kills the whole idea of Japanese Role Playing don't you think?

As stated above, they're are tons of RPGs out there that fit the criteria that you're asking for. Unfortunately, it seems that you won't give them the time of day because of your COD business.

 

[DracoSuave]

JRPGs need to be more modern?

I suppose I missed all those zippers and fetish gear and laser sword beam blasters at my local trip to the renfaire.

 

[vgmaster831]

I suggest Arcanum. It's not modern, but it's not quite fantasy either. It has fantastic role-playing elements that really help with immersion. Despite being old with crap graphics, it is a great RPG that is still enjoyable today.

 

[Bellvedere]

I like past era RPGs and I like future era RPGs. So long as the time period fits well with the story and the game has good mechanics I can get into it. I don't think I have ever ever looked at a game and thought this would be amazing if only it was set in a different time...

Also I don't know why Bethesda would move Oblivion into the future. They already have a consumer base that loves the games and are probably perfectly fine with the era. If Bethesda wanted a game set in the future they'd probably just do that with a different IP you know like that one they acquired like.. 6? years ago now.

 

[Eclectic Dreck]

I don't exactly agree. The problem is the modern world is precisely where we all live. A developer has a fairly obscene amount of leeway when determining game mechanics if you use an unfamiliar setting. How many people here have any legitimate idea of how one might win a sword battle or how far one one could sling a bolt from a 14th century crossbow with lethal results? How many of us really know how well any given suit of armor protects? Precisely because it is unfamiliar, a developer is free to simply assert something is true or not and we are generally willing to accept it as fact.

The same goes when you set something in the far future. While many people (thanks to movies) believe the human body is quite a bit more resistant to damage than it really is, most will accept that a single bullet from even the most pitiful firearm in existence can kill a person but have little idea how protective personal ballistic armor might be. The more high technology one's story integrates the more a developer is simply free to set arbitrary rules for how things work and explain it away with pseudo science (take the element zero in mass effect, which is responsible for magic, armor, FTL travel, firearm technology and countless other lesser plot/reality problem resolution scenarios).

But when you set something in the modern era that we all live in, that leeway flies right out the window. You might be able to heal exponentially faster than a real person in Modern Warfare, but you are also killed by a sum of bullets that wouldn't even worry the flimsiest shield in Mass Effect. Because of our familiarity with the modern world, we have certain expectations on how things work and you simply can't expect the audience to ignore obvious violations of the real world. Take GTA IV as an example. While far from realistic the game at least remains bound by the our perception of the modern world. If a car takes a corner too fast it loses control. If you fall from a tall building you die upon landing. When you get shot just a few times you die. Here, the rules of reality are bent but they are never broken entirely.

As an example, consider Alpha Protocol, an RPG set in the modern era. One of the skill trees helped the player sneak about undetected. At a certain point in the tree, if the player was detected, they became completely invisible for a short duration in order to give them a second chance to sneak up on a target. Reviewer after reviewer chose this very mechanic that was both minor and optional as an example of a flawed design because there was no reasonable excuse provided by the game for how it worked. If set in a standard fantasy setting, the existance of magic is enough as magic can be used to explain anything. In a far future setting, high technology serves the same role as magic. But in the modern era, people are unwilling to accept such a nonsensical explanation for a mechanic.

 

[Vault101]

Fantasy isn't bad but to a non-fantasy fan like me it somtimes feels all a bit "been there done that tolken-esque type thing) sci fi is probably the same but its jsut personel taste

though I do love Dragon age (Yeah I know its REALLY REALLY tolken-esque)

back on topic heres an idea, an RPG set in the universe of Bladerunner ( think somthign similar was done before)

 

[estoria-etnia]

._. Asking JRPGs to be more 'western' in their outlook is like asking a cynic to be more idealistic in their outlook. And as someone who plays primarily RPGs, there is a large selection of them out there. OP doesn't seem to understand exactly what they're talking about. :/

 

[God's Clown]

Why would we need Modern day RPG's? We live in Modern day, and our lives pretty much play out like RPG's. We make decisions, those decision either effect nothing, or a lot of things. We get sicknesses, we get better, we make money, we spend it. Essentially your life is the most realistic modern day RPG you will ever play, and it's first person to boot!

 

[Arehexes]

Dues ex

 

[joebthegreat]

I think the point behind the OP is very true.

Why is it always Medieval? Why is it always Standard Fantasy Setting?

Can't we see some stone age stuff? (Xenoclash was great, lets get some more games that go back to fantastical stone age settings).

Can't we see some tribal games where your group is small and surrounded by a terrifying world of the unknown?

Can't we see some Renaissance games? With a more refined style to it than the standard? (We've seen a few, let's see some more...)

Can't we see some Victorian era? Some Industrial Age? Some Modern Era 1900s style?

The excuse "Well I want to play games to escape" doesn't cut it when you're always going back to the same setting. And a fantastical setting meshed with contemporary society would be AMAZING and much more original than the Standard Fantasy Setting.

 

[Korolev]

Some are. In fact, most JRPGs are set in the future or in some techno-punk realm outside of any conventional historical setting. FFVII and FFVIII took place in a land with heaps of technology - cars, airplanes, guns, missiles, etc. In fact, the last PURELY fantasy FF game was IX, although XII was mostly fantasy with a bit of steam punk. Persona and Devil Summoner take place in Modern day Japan.

As for western RPGs - well, Deux Ex, which had heaps of RPG elements in it, was set in the future with nano-tech and cyborgs. Mass Effect 1 and 2 take place in the future.

The thing is, it's difficult to have RPGs set in modern times. I mean, I don't want to level up my accountant to Charter grade or anything like that. Plus, a huge element of RPGs is with special abilities. And you can't really apply that sort of stuff to modern combat - I mean, you can't have Lv 6 Flashbangs or Lv 30 Bullet-firing skill. Mass Effect got away with that with a lot of handwaving whilst simultaneously shouting "TECHNOLOGY DOES IT" (don't get me wrong, I love the ME series to death, but their "TECHNOLOGY" excuse is very similar to the old "MAGIC" excuse, or "A WIZARD DID IT!"). But we don't have shields and special powers in modern day, so any modern setting would either need a healthy dose of "magic realm" (Like P4's TV land) or "Magic stuff" for it to work.

I just don't see myself Levelling up my Spetnaz so he can learn the Helicopter spell.

 

[omega 616]

We use video games to play out fantasy and for escapism.

Modern times are not your average person's idea of 'something different'.

Agreed.

You know we're not exactly living in interesting times either. The recession we're going though has got nothing on The Great Depression. The war on terrorism is such a dodgy war that the US ended up invading a country that had nothing to do with 9/11.

Not even the culture today is interesting. Everyone is so absorbed with hand held technology and escapism that you can say we're living in an age of anti-culture. The 50s all the way up to the 90s was a much interesting time to live in, and 2010 still looks like it's going to be another repeat of the last 10 years.

Any other time period was at least 10x more fascinated then the world we're living in today. We're living in a very boring, boring, boring, boring, age, so what pro would be there making an RPG based on todays world?

lol

Agreed aswell.

If you were to make an RPG in todays times it would be wake up, have a power shower, sit eat breakfast, room mate comes in and sits, down tells you, you start work today in such and such a place, you get to work, after typing 60 words a minute for 9 hours, you trot off to the pub, down 5 beers, stumble home and sit infront of the box, order pizza, nom nom nom, till midnight then go to bed. (first bit was based on the start of Morrowind)

Yippie! Doing that for 70 hours would be boring as hell.

The thing about oldy times is things were happening, shit went down! I am playing dragon age at them moment, I am killing dragons! They could do a mafia one with the prohibition but that would be Mafia, with a skill thing tacked on. Isn't Fallout:NV based around that time though? Although it does need a bit of a clean up.

What would you be doing in todays sociaty? Killing bacteria with Dettol "kills 99.9% of germs, DEAD!"? Or protest by walking with a bunch of people chanting stuff? If your going to be a meanie, you can start to riot? It is just a very boring time to live in, everything is sorted out by politics, rather than killing a guy.