Great, so we're on the same page that you have no idea what you're talking about, and that your post was completely irrelevant.Never said you did.
Great, so we're on the same page that you have no idea what you're talking about, and that your post was completely irrelevant.Never said you did.
No, just that you keep floundering with the English language, consistency and with having a point. As I have proven time and again.Great, so we're on the same page that you have no idea what you're talking about, and that your post was completely irrelevant.
So do you have any actual arguments or counter-arguments to present?No, just that you keep floundering with the English language, consistency and with having a point. As I have proven time and again.
To what, exactly? You've steadfastly refused to actually take any position yourself. Why would we make an argument to you over the concerns of someone else?So do you have any actual arguments or counter-arguments to present?
Since you all have been arguing with me for the last 5 pages, I assumed you would have already answered that question.To what, exactly? You've steadfastly refused to actually take any position yourself. Why would we make an argument to you over the concerns of someone else?
You're avoiding the substance of the arguments which are valid to make trivial complaints about precise representation of what you said. It's a deflection.It is not petty to refuse to have words put in your mouth, or to correct one's false accusations. If you argument hinges on changing the words that I say, then your argument must not be very strong.
No, don't you see, you're just not arguing to his satisfaction.You're avoiding the substance of the arguments which are valid to make trivial complaints about precise representation of what you said. It's a deflection.