Dragon Age 3: Inquisition Coming Fall 2014

Recommended Videos

Milanezi

New member
Mar 2, 2009
619
0
0
First reaction to Morrigan: WOOOOOO!!! She's back :D
Second reaction to Morrigan: ... mole... mo-mole... take her away from my sight

Seriously, I like the fact that they are keeping up with some npcs, I loved the first game but never truly felt anything for my character in particular, Dragon Age 2 was pretty nice, but as good, however I did feel more entangled with my personal character and most npcs, I hope they find a way to keep both gameplay and character interesting, given how both are important for RPGs.
 

spiffleh

New member
Jul 12, 2010
167
0
0
Not much to go on re: gameplay or story to be honest, but I appreciate they didn't shoehorn in a protagonist. In a game where you can play as both genders and can customize your character's appearance it has always bugged me when they put the "main character" in trailers and on the box. *cough mass effect cough*
 

Combustion Kevin

New member
Nov 17, 2011
1,205
0
0
Imbechile said:
Soooo...... Yet another Bioware game where I save the world from the big bad.......

yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn........
well, what else is gonna threaten the world, seriously?
Dragon Age borrows heavily from tolkien and DnD, of course it's about defeating a big bad, but that's not what makes it interesting.

It's the journey there...
 

Nomadiac

New member
Jan 11, 2013
37
0
0
I'm not judging the game until we see gameplay. It looked nice and it's got me excited to hear more, definitely (though I already like Dragon Age), but there's nothing about the actual game in there apart from characters and the vaguest of plot details.

When the gameplay trailer does come out it had better be damn good too, because The Witcher 3's has been shown at E3 and it looks amazing. That there's going to be an extra year of development is reassuring to hear, though. However, as a PC gamer I wish it weren't a cross-generational release...ah well.

SpunkeyMonkey said:
No, just no.

The first two main characters who make an appearance are Varric & the Arishok - I'm trying to wipe the abomination of DA:2 from my memory! *facepalm* The second I saw that stupid fucking manga-esq crossbow my heart sank.

Granted, they are two of DA:2's best characters, but it's instantly put me off the game as it's clear Bioware just don't get their audience anymore and are sticking to that non-fantasy, Dragon-Effect, vibe implemented in DA:2.

And then we see a butchered Morrigan, who now looks ugly and tamed in a stupid dress.

I try not to read into trailers too much, but the whole tone and sentiment of this screams
"We're still determined to ignore DA:O as much as possible. Dragon Effect is still the way.""

Fail :(

Sorry, I've got to rant here. that whole trailer looks awful, fucking awful. They really haven't paid attention to anything which made the original so mint in the first place. I'm dreading this, thank God for The Witcher 3!
You just copy pasted that over from the other comments thread...? Ah well, got to spread that really important and serious angst and outrage to the world, I guess.

It's also funny how they've actually been purposely avoiding references to DA2, or even it's existence, apart from Varric (who is one of the few things most people liked from that game). It's not DA3:I anymore, it's just DA:I - and the website only mentions Bioware as makers of "Dragon Age: Origins and Mass Effect 3". Makes me feel better about this, if anything - I liked DA2, but as a game, it was shit compared to DA:O. Those dungeons...
 

BaronIveagh

New member
Apr 26, 2011
343
0
0
I thought EA had already lead the world of Dragon Age to its bitter end in Dragon Age 2, or that God Aweful Dragon Age CGI anime movie..
 

Ishal

New member
Oct 30, 2012
1,176
0
0
Mycroft Holmes said:
neppakyo said:
Hope it tanks worse than DA2
Yeah that would be so great, Bioware would have to fire a bunch of people and they would probably have to go on welfare and lose their homes if they couldn't find more work. lol can you imagine the thousands of unemployed people this could result in?

Ishal said:
I got that impression. I'm guessing you are playing as 1 of three people.

1) "the inquisitor" the generic character that they made up for the third game. Not matter who you name yourself you are still the inquisitor, just like how you were "the warden" in DA:O

2) You play the warden again, though this might depend on perhaps involving a save game transfer

3) You play as the demon child, but again this hinges upon you having made that choice or Bioware canonizing it.
David Gaider already said that the wardens story is over and he/she will not be the main character of any future Dragon Age games. They also said that you will not be forced to play as an inquisitor or join the inquisition. So options 1 and 2 are out. And unless god-babies age a lot faster or the mage war has been going on for like 10+ years by the time inquisition starts, I doubt you will play as him/her either.

So my guess is that you probably play as Orlesian nobility or something. Maybe they will try to bring back the 'origin' part of DA:O. And give you a few choices for backgrounds to the voiced human character. Like how Mass Effect did it.
You know, I remember that now. That bit about what Gaider said... I just put it out of my mind because... Gaider. Not the biggest fan of that guy. He's only a few pegs down from Casey Hudson at this point.

I'm not wishing ill of Bioware, and I still believe they can pull this off, but I think the chances of that are very very small at this point. I think the best they can do is hope for a return to to form and scrap the entire combat system from DAII. Your speculation about the origin theme returning would help, I think. I'd certainly like to see it. The long development time is a good sign, but I won't be preordering or buying in the first month. I'll wait to hear what the community thinks. Not the BSN... but the folks around here and some folks on youtube.
 

Blunderboy

New member
Apr 26, 2011
2,223
0
0
I do love me some Morrigan.

Beyond that, my thoughts can be summed up thusly.

Pleasebegood.Pleasebegood.Pleasebegood.Pleasebegood.Pleasebegood.Pleasebegood.Pleasebegood.Pleasebegood.Pleasebegood.Pleasebegood.
 

SacremPyrobolum

New member
Dec 11, 2010
1,213
0
0
synobal said:
Ugg bringing back Morrigan seriously, her story was finished. The only reason they've dragged her back is to try and get back fans of Origins that they lost with Dragon Age 2. Like me, well it's not gonna work EA you can keep your inquisition and the dragon it rode in on.
Really? I would say her story was just beginning.

I mean, if you got her pregnant in the first game you have that story to tell with her half-archdeamon child and if you didn't...

Well, its not above Dragon Age at to ret-con what you did in the previous games (see: Liliana) and really, I don't think I want to live in a world where the Warden from the first game was so dumb that he didn't take Morrigan up on the offer in the first place.
 

synobal

New member
Jun 8, 2011
2,188
0
0
SacremPyrobolum said:
synobal said:
Ugg bringing back Morrigan seriously, her story was finished. The only reason they've dragged her back is to try and get back fans of Origins that they lost with Dragon Age 2. Like me, well it's not gonna work EA you can keep your inquisition and the dragon it rode in on.
Really? I would say her story was just beginning.

I mean, if you got her pregnant in the first game you have that story to tell with her half-archdeamon child and if you didn't...

Well, its not above Dragon Age at to ret-con what you did in the previous games (see: Liliana) and really, I don't think I want to live in a world where the Warden from the first game was so dumb that he didn't take Morrigan up on the offer in the first place.
But her story has nothing to do with Hawkes war, and all that silly stuff. They brought her in instead of a new character simply to draw back old players whom they turned off with DA2.
 

Texas Joker 52

All hail the Pun Meister!
Jun 25, 2011
1,285
0
0
Gordon_4 said:
Well some good information, and some bad (Depending on how you feel about it I suppose).

Coming from the Dragon Age Wiki [http://dragonage.wikia.com/wiki/Dragon_Age:_Inquisition], be warned: This is a lot of text.

Regarding the Player Character said:
Dragon Age: Inquisition will showcase a new protagonist, who will be a human, with the ability to choose an origin. Unlike in Dragon Age: Origins, this background will not be playable, but will still have a noticeable impact on the plot. Mike Laidlaw has stated that playing as a different character "does not mean your old character may never appear in future games," which could indicate that the new protagonist will be able to meet Hawke and the Warden (provided that the latter survived the events of Dragon Age: Origins).
Apparently a human, though you will choose their background, apparently. I would have preferred to be able to choose race too, but since Hawke was pretty fun to play as, I'm willing to bet this character will be to. And them being able to meet either Hawke or the Warden is pretty cool to think about too.

Regarding Location said:
Dragon Age: Inquisition will be set in Thedas, and it has been heavily implied that the game will be set primarily in Orlais. The game will cover more geographic territory than its predecessors, with one map being described as four to five times the size of Ferelden, the setting of the first game in the series.
That is particularly interesting, though it does make me wonder if the player will be Orlesian. I actually kind of hope not.

Regarding General Plot said:
BioWare mentioned that the main plot will be "saving the world from itself." The plot will involve an all out war between mages and templars, the foundations of which comprise the main plot of Dragon Age II. Along with the larger size of the game map, the player will be able to travel to countries such as Tevinter to calm or encourage the fighting.
Well, I suppose it was too much to hope for a different conflict, but I suppose the ending to Dragon Age 2 made it too much to hope for. Still, depending on how it's done, it may be pretty good. I'd look forward to going to Tevinter and slaughtering both the Magisters and the Slavers, even though I usually end up siding with the mages.

Regarding Save File Transfer said:
Laidlaw also confirmed the ability for players to import their save files from the first two games into Dragon Age: Inquisition to "shore up world consistency." Mark Darrah later stated that BioWare is looking into creating ways to include choices made in previous titles without the need for a Save File transfer system.
That was to be expected, really, but still a nice thing to have all the same.

Regarding Gameplay said:
BioWare is planning on fusing elements of both earlier games in the series, Dragon Age: Origins and Dragon Age II, into the creation of Dragon Age: Inquisition.

Combat is also expected to differ somewhat from its predecessors and focus more on a player's ability to prepare, position and form a cohesive team with his or her party members, requiring fewer repetitive finger strikes but better thinking. The armour customisation will differ from both Dragon Age: Origins and Dragon Age II, in that each party member will have interchangeable armour pieces that will customise the look according to its specification and class. They will also refrain from reusing environments, a common criticism of Dragon Age II. Cinematic designer Jon Perry said that "one level in Dragon Age 3 is as big as all of the levels in Dragon Age 2."

Ray Muzyka, the CEO of BioWare, said in an interview with Wired.com that Dragon Age: Inquisition would be influenced by more open world games, such as The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, which BioWare is "checking out aggressively."

BioWare will use a brand new engine which will use Frostbite 3 as a foundation.

It has been confirmed by David Gaider that the Game will feature "multiplayer in some form." It is not known yet what the Multiplayer element will be.

Producer Cameron Lee has implied that there may be some form of "castle-controlling" mechanics.
Ok, it seems that:

-The gameplay will be relatively new for the series.

-Armor will be going the way of Mass Effect 2-3, in that how much protection it provides is the same regardless, but the individual pieces may provide specific bonuses, and will differ in appearance.

-Levels will not be reused, like in Dragon Age 2.

-There will be some kind of Multiplayer.

-There may be "castle-controlling mechanics". Tower defense sections, maybe?

I'm not looking forward to there being multiplayer, but depending on how its done, it may be fun enough to play. The "castle-controlling mechanics" also sound kind of ominous too. But, I'm cautiously optimistic.
 

conmag9

New member
Aug 4, 2008
569
0
0
I don't mind the delay. It shows they aren't being rushed out like DA2 was, which is a hopefully sign.

Don't care about Morrigan. Like, at all. I found her incredibly annoying. Still glad she had the third option when it came down to the final choice in DA1, even if she's obviously going to benefit from it. I'm much more interested in pounding the Templars into post-Templar paste, and from the look of some of that magic, it should be a blast. The Qunari were also fascinating, so hopefully this should go well.

News of multiplayer is the one thing I'm actually pissed about. It's getting incredibly stupid, shoving it into previously single player series. If they manage to pull off a good single player, I'll live, but it better not drag resources away from the infinitely more important story. Or do something stupid like tie them together ala Mass Effect 3.
 

SacremPyrobolum

New member
Dec 11, 2010
1,213
0
0
synobal said:
SacremPyrobolum said:
synobal said:
Ugg bringing back Morrigan seriously, her story was finished. The only reason they've dragged her back is to try and get back fans of Origins that they lost with Dragon Age 2. Like me, well it's not gonna work EA you can keep your inquisition and the dragon it rode in on.
Really? I would say her story was just beginning.

I mean, if you got her pregnant in the first game you have that story to tell with her half-archdeamon child and if you didn't...

Well, its not above Dragon Age at to ret-con what you did in the previous games (see: Liliana) and really, I don't think I want to live in a world where the Warden from the first game was so dumb that he didn't take Morrigan up on the offer in the first place.
But her story has nothing to do with Hawkes war, and all that silly stuff. They brought her in instead of a new character

simply to draw back old players whom they turned off with DA2.
From the looks of things I would say an Archdeamon baby is extremely relevant to the plot of the story, whether it be in Fereldan or that other place their in.