Jonathan Hornsby said:
Am I really the only one who thought that Dragon Age 2 was BETTER than Origins? Yeah it was rushed and had its flaws, but it at least was trying to tell its own story and had the balls to try noire style storytelling in a fantasy setting. Origins was just a generic example of every medieval fantasy trope in the book with a boring silent protagonist and dull combat. Take off your rose-tented glasses and stop drooling over Morrigan's chest; Dragon Age Origins was nothing special.
Interestingly what both advocates and skeptics of a "how original was Origins" tend to forget is that the clichéness of Origins was intentional. The whole game was one big shout-out to the old RPG's, even to the point where it was called "the spiritual successor of Baldur's Gate."
Anyway, I will remain on the side of caution where the "200 hours of gameplay" is concerned. This is a claim made rather often in the RPG scene, and devs tend to exaggerate a lot. I tick 40-50 hours on most of my RPG's, so as long as Inquisition offers me something similar, I'm good.