Dragon Age Writer Suggests That Everyone Just Calm Down

Kraj

New member
Jan 21, 2008
414
0
0
D_987 said:
Paragon Fury said:
You've already announced that you are completely forgoing one of the most interesting and praised things about the first game.

Yeah, I think people have a right to question you and be pissed.
I agree; at the same time, having just finished Leliana's Song I am a lot more hesitant to criticise Dragon Age 2 - that DLC has a pre-set main character, with a voice and back-story, yet was probably the best quest in Dragon Age - certainly the most personal. If Dragon Age 2 is like that piece of DLC then I'll be happy.

However, the whole "simplified combat" is still worrisome...
... "people" have no right to be "pissed". Its their game; they can build it as they want. Making a judgement call on such minimal information is foolish for anyone to do in almost any situation, especially a video game thats barely through beginning stage production. . . seriously guys. seriously. If "people" are "pissed" maybe they can GET A JOB THERE AND DO IT THEMSELVES if their so awesome. :>_>


just my 2 cents. :D
 

Zarthek

New member
Apr 12, 2009
533
0
0
Ava Elzbieta said:
Need...Alistair...
Actually I read the Game Informer article about this game... It seems that most of the story will take place around the same time as the story in Origins, just in a different place. Just like Mass Effect to ME2, some of the choices you made in the original will get mentioned. To that point if Alistair lived, he may just pop up somewhere, not likely that he'll join the party though, but we'll see.

OT: I'm looking forward to this game because well... It's Bioware, they make good RPGs and that's all I need to know.
 

McNinja

New member
Sep 21, 2008
1,510
0
0
People get like that all of the time. They instantly start passing judgement as soon as they think they know exactly what's happening, when they actually do not. I will wait until I start seeing screens of not pre-alpha and when the website has more than one page with two pictures and three paragraphs.
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
Kraj said:
... "people" have no right to be "pissed". Its their game; they can build it as they want.
Games live or die on customer satisfaction, not whether the designer likes playing the game or not...

Making a judgement call on such minimal information is foolish for anyone to do in almost any situation, especially a video game thats barely through beginning stage
Based on the information given, and Bioware's past history, any informed person with half a brain will realize what will occur.

production. . . seriously guys. seriously. If "people" are "pissed" maybe they can GET A JOB THERE AND DO IT THEMSELVES if their so awesome. :>_>
Wow, what a great argument that was...In all honestly what a stupid point to bring up; so now fans aren't allowed to complain about anything being changed that they liked about a franchise unless they themselves have a massive team and budget with which to make a AAA game? Or they should go get a job at Bioware? How are Bioware going to know peoples thoughts on the matter if nobody says anything? When the game's finished and it's to late?

Again, I don't know why you quoted me because none of your points even matches what I was discussing...
 

Kraj

New member
Jan 21, 2008
414
0
0
D_987 said:
Kraj said:
... "people" have no right to be "pissed". Its their game; they can build it as they want.
Games live or die on customer satisfaction, not whether the designer likes playing the game or not...

Making a judgement call on such minimal information is foolish for anyone to do in almost any situation, especially a video game thats barely through beginning stage
Based on the information given, and Bioware's past history, any informed person with half a brain will realize what will occur.

production. . . seriously guys. seriously. If "people" are "pissed" maybe they can GET A JOB THERE AND DO IT THEMSELVES if their so awesome. :>_>
Wow, what a great argument that was...In all honestly what a stupid point to bring up; so now fans aren't allowed to complain about anything being changed that they liked about a franchise unless they themselves have a massive team and budget with which to make a AAA game? Or they should go get a job at Bioware? How are Bioware going to know peoples thoughts on the matter if nobody says anything? When the game's finished and it's to late?

Again, I don't know why you quoted me because none of your points even matches what I was discussing...
Those are all good points! Sorry about the random rant; I suppose my personal dislike of people complaining about the choices a developer makes impeded on my clarity. I am quite sorry for the inadequate argument. See you in other forums! >_<
 

demoman_chaos

New member
May 25, 2009
2,254
0
0
Quadem said:
Perhaps you should invest your interest in another genre of game then. Might I suggest... Oh, I dunno... A HACK-AND-SLASH! If your tastes are so shallow that they deny you enjoyment from a game that doesn't demand you barrage the X button ad nauseum, then I suggest you squander more hours through Ninety Nine Nights, and cease bleating about your distaste towards a game that was never intended to appeal to your Hack-and-slash demographic!
Hack&Slash is not my genre of choice, I like WRPG's (I don't like JRPG's for the most part). The problem I have with most JRPG's gameplay is the combat feels like the game doesn't want you to play it. It doesn't feel like you have control except for just giving suggestions the characters may or may not decide to follow. Dragon Age's combat feels like a JRPG.

I actually prefer Dynasty Warriors over N3.
 

IamQ

New member
Mar 29, 2009
5,226
0
0
Paragon Fury said:
You've already announced that you are completely forgoing one of the most interesting and praised things about the first game.

Yeah, I think people have a right to question you and be pissed.
People have no right to be pissed until they've actually seen anything from the game. Right now we only have a little bit of information. No, Pre-rendered trailer, no gameplay trailer, not even a teaser trailer, so why do you get so worked up? You haven't seen the finished product yet, you haven't seen anything of it.
 

Stormz

New member
Jul 4, 2009
1,450
0
0
If the game is dumbed down even more then DAO I'll be pissed. The combat and everything about it was already simple. We aren't fucking morons here. We can handle needing to think a bit.

That said I will look out for this. I still enjoyed DAO.

The mute characters in all bioware games never change facial expressions...ever, it's very unsettling. So I don't mind the way they're going with character creation. It might also help tell a better story because they already have a preset character to work with.
 

_Cake_

New member
Apr 5, 2009
921
0
0
I just really enjoyed being able to be different races. Origins felt like the start of something, end was left pretty open. Also I rather Hawke not be voiced over cause then you get the same sorta character each time like Commander Shepard, not a sultry human blood mage or a wise dwarven noble, or a city elf skittish of humans. Unless they have more then one voice to chose from for each sex and they actually say what I pick.

Most importantly ... how am I gonna replace Alister? Cause Anders sure didn't do it >_>

The slow-mo ending kills for mages (and hopefully archers too) sounds great. I love the idea of the 10 year storyline so much.
 

WaywardHaymaker

New member
Aug 21, 2009
991
0
0
I know BioWare has an impressive track record and all, and I am quite a fan of their work, but...

They already said that they were changing two of my favorite things about the game: The character customization on a crazy level and the strategic combat.

They even changed the dialogue to Mass Effect's, so I guarantee that it will be clear-cut which way you tilt the stick to say something nice, mean, or investigative. That's why I liked the dialogue tree, it's not clear what reaction people will have to your remarks (Unless it really is, like if it's prefixed with (Attack))

It's Bioware and it's Dragon Age. Those are the two things that are holding me onto this game.
 

cryofpaine

New member
Apr 6, 2010
27
0
0
As long as they don't do something stupid, like take one of the best RPG's of all time and build the sequel into an MMO....
 

Cliffie

New member
Nov 25, 2009
60
0
0
I'll give it a shot. I loved the first game way too much to simply turn a blind eye to the second one because they're removing Origin-stories or the fact that I can't chose to play as a dwarf or an elf.

As for the "simplified combat, well, there's really only one reason for it and I'm going to end up sounding like a douche for saying it but here it goes: Consoles. This isn't news to most people but this is really the only reason. Dragon Ages combat did not play well with a controller and therefor they have to change it so that it fits a console controller. Personally, I don't like it but I can't say I blame them. There are way more console gamers then there are hardcore PC-gamers so obviously they'll try and cater to their biggest market.

We'll just have to wait and see, these guys know what they're doing, but even so. I really liked that Mass Effect and Dragon Age, Biowares two major franchises, were so different. Now, at first glance anyway, it seems like they're both trying to be the same thing and I really hope this isn't the case. Not that Mass Effect is bad or anything, in fact I love the game, but as you all know: Variety is the spice of life! D:
 

JaredXE

New member
Apr 1, 2009
1,378
0
0
I like how people are bitching about moral alignment systems like ME2's. When I played that game as a Paragon I got 100% Light Side and over 50% complete bastard. I smacked people, knee-capped them, let them get assassinated in front of me, let people burn in a refinery fire to let another bastard have revenge on an even bigger bastard. Oh, and decked a women for making disingenuous assertations.


Frankly, moral choice systems aren't all that bad and really easy to manipulate. Just ignore the morality slider and play your character like would anyways.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Cyrax987 said:
Should give them chance though. I mean when has Bioware really disappointed?
Cyrax987 said:
Should give them chance though. I mean when has Bioware really disappointed?
I would say Bioware has disappointed their fan base quite a bit. Specifically the RPG gamer fan base.

"Mass Effect 2" was financially successful and praised by action-oriented shooter fans for simplifying the combat down into a shooter and minimizing the RPG elements to near irrelevency. Something that caused a lot of rage from RPG fans, despite the high reviews from the mainstream.

A lot of people pretty much let this go because "well, we have Dragon Age", however it seems like they are doing the same thing for all intents and purposes. Dragon Age wasn't the deepest RPG system out there to begin with, it's simply been noteworthy because it's deeper than most of what else is out there at the moment. I mean overall your choices largely came down to picking a class and a style of fighting (or what magic spells to use) and then deciding what order to fill up the boxes in as you advanced. Simplifying something like that more is pretty much akin to removing the RPG elements all together. I'm sure a number of mainstreamers will love the idea, since they don't have to really worry about the numbers at all, but for the RPG gamers who are admittedly lower in number this is akin to being stabbed in the back yet again.

As far as Bioware's comments go, I think they are bringing it on themselves. The existing fan base of RPG gamers are concerned, and for good reason. What's more the lack of detailed information being revealed is NOT a defense, but part of the problem in this case. I understand that game companies like to hold their cards close to their chest for a number of reasons, however if you drop a bomb on people like this and then say "hey, don't criticize based on what we've said, you don't have all the information" that's flat out ridiculous.

What's more I'll go so far as to say that right now we're looking at 8 months until release, and delays are always possible. Right now is the time period where central game changes could still be made (perhaps including a further delay to make those changes). That is why people are going to be vocal and try and push.

I'll also be blunt, I think the numbers on "Mass Effect 2" were deceptive. A lot of people rushed out to buy it because they loved the first game and wanted more of the same. For all of the shooter guys turning cartwheels in the street, most of the serious RPG fans were seriously irritated. Truth be told if I had known what that game was actually like when it was released, chances are I would not have pre-ordered a special collector's edition or anything and waited for it to drop in price at least. It was a good game, but I was somewhat disappointed with the way the changes materialied to be blunt.

Hey, I could be wrong, but I'll be honest in saying I have trust issues with Bioware at the moment. I haven't pre-ordered this game way in advance, and despite having supported their RPGs in the past (buying multiple copies of Dragon Age: Origins and the DLC), I think this is a betrayal of that support. Unless something massive happens to convince me otherwise, these announcements have made it so I am unlikely to be a day #1 sale.

I supported Mass Effect 2 (including DLC) because I figure any company can make a misstep and mistreat their core fan base a little without going totally off the deep end. However if "Dragon Age 2" turns out to be "Mass Effect 2" with swords, Bioware is going to lose my pro-active patronage.

-

On the off chance anyone from Bioware is actually reading this I'll say this much: I also use the name "Therumancer" as my handle on the Bioware social network. Go check out how much stuff I've bought from you personally. Then consider my father and stepmother are also signed up and have their own copies and DLC (despite being 34, I'm retired on disabillity and live at home). I'm definatly not alone in buying all this stuff (including two copies of everything for DA:O including Awakenings in differant formats) nor is mine the only household of gamers, however if this turns out like it seems like it's going to your going to lose a reliable, paying customer. I simply will not be running out to buy a copy of "Mass Effect 2 with swords", I want my RPG games to be RPG games... not semi-customizable shooters/hackers with a lot of cutscenes and dialogue options.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
On the one hand, he has a point. On the other, they are changing some pretty fundamental elements, so I can understand the response.
 
Nov 28, 2007
10,686
0
0
Wow...it's surprising. A company can make a lot of great games, but no one will trust them to continue. If they make a bad game, it will be used as a reason all their games will suck.

Also, if they keep things basically the same, it's just a pale imitation of the first, and sucks. If it changes too much, it's not being true to the series and sucks. Can't have it both ways, fans. What would make you happy?