I'm more inclined to think that the Bethesda-Dragons thing is a coincidence. People have been asking for dragons for over a year now, and he's always been coy about it.
But I shudder to think of Activisions adventure into the fantasy world.Blunderboy said:Or just to try and piss off Bioware as well with his new game "Giant Flying Lizards that Breath Fire - Time"Valok said:My first thought.Blunderboy said:Well this is really going to help with that legal battle.
I'm actually inclined to think he did that just to piss then.
Apples and oranges. You're talking about two games that scratch two completely different itches. Terraria is about gear collecting and boos stomping, Minecraft is about survival and creativity.V8 Ninja said:I'm sorry, but I gotta go with my gut; Terraria 1.1 will be better than whatever Minecraft 2.0 throws at it.
Well, I honestly thought that it was Jeb who wanted dragons (and not that long ago) and Notch rejected it at first until now, but nevermind, let this not detract from the fact that I think dragons are a bad idea, especially if they make them rideable, as some people have suggested above, though Mojang seem down on this idea anyway, which is a good thing.samsonguy920 said:Dragons have been planned for Minecraft long before Mojang started work on Scrolls. What would be wrong here is if Notch decided not to go with implementing dragons just because Bethesda started being all crybaby about it. Besides, Minecraft is not related to Scrolls in any way short of being made by the same company.Maeta said:Yeah, even though they don't have any claim on dragons, the fact that Skyrim features them heavily, and then after the lawsuit has drawn so much attention, Notch sticking them in does seem a bit of a middlefinger to Bethesda, basically it makes him look a bit of a twat, in honesty. I know that there's no real reason for him not to include them, but the timing is a bit shitty. I would have at least waited until the whole thing is resolved. There's also the rumour going round that he's doing double-wielding, which Skyrim boasts as a feature, for the full Minecraft release one week afterwards, and he only considered this after Skyrim announced it...Aprilgold said:No, but they'll be pissed, thus the cat has something to say.dmase said:Wait does bethseda have dragons copyrighted too?
Rhys95 said:Hey Bethesda......
U Mad Bro?
Yeah, I know that Bethesda will have no claim to stop him from doing this, but it does seem a bit wrong. If anyone could come up with an analogy for this, then that would be appreciated, because I'm drawing a very rare blank in this instance, maybe just due to fatigue
Seriously, people, get your heads out of the legal gutter already and enjoy what is being wrought here.
I'm sorry, but your comment, avatar and the content of this article made that comment the best I've read.MASTACHIEFPWN said:Anyone else think MineCraft is loosing it's flare that made it great?
But what would be the right time? If Notch would wait until after a court decision he'd either: 1) have won and therefore appear to be rubbing it in (bad winner) OR 2) have lost and therefore appear to be making a childish last dish effort to anger Bethesda (bad loser). By the time the lawsuit was issued it was too late to reveal dragons at all.Jacob Haggarty said:Just seems to be baiting bethesda a bit... i know that dragons aren't really one of those things that people CAN own, but what with the whole legal battle going on, it seems a bit cheeky to announce that your game is going to feature something that the company that is taking you to court is also featuring in THEIR game.