Dust 514 Fanfest Preview
- Thread starter Slycne
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Well there's no way Microsoft would let them do something like this, but I'm also not sure why they didn't make it for the PC as well. Maybe to get it on the PS3 they had to make a deal with Sony to keep it exclusive. Would make sense, since it gives Sony something they could use to pimp how "open" the PS3 is compared to the competition or something like that.Feriluce said:
The more I see of this game the more i'm excited. I've always been interested in EVE Online but never had the time to properly invest in it, but maybe this can make me feel like I am a part of the EVE universe.
Man, two different games being able to interact from different systems. Seems like such a sweet idea. But whats to stop some rogue EVE player from just bombarding everyone for teh lols.
from the looks of it this is attached to sovereigntyTiger Sora said:
so its a alliance level interaction
which also means alliance run dust teams are going to be LOADED
From the FanFest vid where they presented the system it looked that first, the player on ground needs to give the player in EVE special code, and then it's the player on ground who selects target after which the ship fires it's cannons.Tiger Sora said:
So You can't really just fly by and nuke crap randomly, you need to interact with people on ground.
Does anyone have a spare PS3 that they want to get rid of? I'd be glad to take it off your hands.
It's really too bad they aren't releasing this on the PC, cuz they've pretty much alienated an entire half (or more) of the FPS market doing it on console, after all, if you have what ammounts to an mmofps, wouldn't PC be a more viable market, what with a new generation of consoles coming out within the next couple years, wouldn't it be a better strategy to build for a platform that won't be overshadowed by it's larger more powerful decendant when it pops off the factory floor and into stores.
If you have a game, on PC that's a MMO of the scale of EVE, and then make a game that's going to be integral to system control, on a console that'll soon be considered OLD NEWS, doesn't that seem a rather... I dunno, detrimental decision on their part?
If you have a game, on PC that's a MMO of the scale of EVE, and then make a game that's going to be integral to system control, on a console that'll soon be considered OLD NEWS, doesn't that seem a rather... I dunno, detrimental decision on their part?
I think the reason is CCP wasn't able to develop the game from their own pocket while also having to work on EVE and World of Darkness MMO. The exclusive deal with Sony brought some additional money in as well as help in terms of development from Sony devs (tho I guess that was mostly with specifics of PS3 system and cross-platform integration)DoomyMcDoom said:
Mind You that's mostly speculations based on some snippets from when DUST was first announced to public.
Pretty much only thing stopping me from getting PS3 to play this game is the fact I simply can't stand playing shooters with pad. It feels so unnatural to me. Mouse or death.
Sounds likely enough, still, the plan seems just... Not all that well thought out to me, just kinda smells like a bad business choice.Keava said:
And I'm right there with you, if I'm gaming on a console I almost never play shooters for that exact reason, I have a gaming PC so I play my shooters there, just better feeling controls with a mouse/keyboard.
I personally believe its the numbers. If we take this source as gospel for Battlefield 3 http://www.gamezone.com/products/battlefield-3/news/battlefield-3-xbox-360-sales-nearly-double-ps3 Written on November 3rd 2011DoomyMcDoom said:
Xbox - 2,249,092 Sold
PS3 - 1,486,067 Sold
PC - 487,181 Sold
Total - 4,222,340 Sold
Even for a popular series the PC sales are not even close to the console sales. For a new and untested IP? I wouldn't even consider a port to PC.
1) It's a free to play game so no box sales.srodney said:
2) Sales numbers for PCs never been accurate, mostly because they only include retail sales (Steam doesn't release sale numbers) and are limited to first month most of the time, while PC games tend to sell in longer timespan.
3) According to Pc Gaming Alliance, PC game revenue is higher than any single console, and overall makes up for 48% of total gaming related revenue (retail + digital + DLC + ads + subscriptions)
But this "New and untested IP" we're talking about is connected to a game that is popular on the PC. and the reason Battlefield 3 sold SO WELL on consoles is that it IS a name that is known, you can't compare sales numbers like that, when a ton of games that just appear that have no name behind them sell better on PC, why? Because PC has a wider range of distribution options, put that fucker on steam and it'll sell like hotcakes... Also, those numbers might be heavily influenced by the rather large level of popular hate for origin, I know that the requirement of origin is what stopped me from buying BF3.srodney said:
I would also like to point out that the PC gaming market had already been hit with the release of several other popular IPs at that time of year, so... you really have to look at the entire picture here, in the time ONE POPULAR game comes out on a console, you sometimes have like 10+ popular PC games launching, across a wide variety of distributions systems, and the fact that I know that myself and a good deal of PC gamers I know wait to see if it's worth buying before spending money, which could also create a much smaller innitial sales rush.
But my main reason for thinking it's a bad Idea to release a game linked to an already persisting universe on a console that may be phased out in 2 years, is simply that in itself, if you release your game on PC it has the lasting power of whatever compatability it has, which when you consider how I can run games produced in the late 80s early 90s on my PC just FINE(usually using Dos Box to negate a lot of the compatability and clock speed problems, but still.), and when you're looking at a consistant, continuing universe, putting any essencial part of the experience on a cosole that has already been out long enough for development trends to suggest it won't be around much longer is a BAD IDEA.
Sony being "well aware" of any trends is hard to believe, I mean, looking at their development history... most recently the Vita...Kwil said:
Assuming it's only Dreadnoughts and maybe a few other capital ships that can bombard, that requires a fair amount of support or they will be sitting ducks from other EvE ships. So even if there were no special codes people wouldn't just fly around alone and shoot at random planets.Tiger Sora said:
There has been some rumors that CCP are working on a PC port, one can only hope.
