OutrageousEmu said:
BanthaFodder said:
OutrageousEmu said:
BanthaFodder said:
I'm laughing my ass off at all the idiotic fanboys here who can't comprehend a Nintendo console being hands-down BETTER than every other home console available...
I'm laughing my ass off at fanboys who seem to think being more expensive, having less support and having an awkward controller makes something "hands-down BETTER".
all the reports are flying in that the controller, while awkward looking, is actually incredibly comfortable. one argument debunked.
they have not announced a price yet. two arguments debunked.
the latest video shows SOME of the games being released in the FIRST year of the WiiU's release. WiiU obviously has TONS of third-party support. and there, you have NO arguments to stand on.
but then again, this IS the Escapist.
where Nintendo is automatically bad. even if it's the best thing at E3. it still SUCKS!!!
BECAUSE IT'S EXPENSIVE EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVEN'T ANNOUNCED A PRICE!!!
and no matter how expensive it gets, there's no way it'll top 599 US dollars.
Wow, you managed to turn a lack of evidence into "debunking". Thats what Birthers do.
Oh yeah, thats totally sound reasoning "The Wii U has tonnes of third party support that they didn't show because my brain doesn't work". You don't have a single fucking shred to support that this won't be a gigantic failure.
Oh, and about the "using a gimmick totally makes the versions all better", Ps3 offering Move Support and 3d. The WiiU can't even win on gimmicks. It can't beat the Ps3 on power, it can't beat either on library, and it certainly isn't unique in offering a gimmick.
I'll just sort this into a nice, easy to navigate list:
1. so I'm comparable to a "birther" because I pointed out that you have NO actual argument to stand on? I never said it would be cheap. for all I know, it could be really fucking expensive. however, you made the argument that it IS expensive. I pointed out that that argument makes no sense. by your logic, you are comparable to Jack Thompson; you make wild accusations with no concrete proof or evidence.
2. let me reiterate; they showed SOME of the third-party games that would show up at the same time as the console. if you honestly think that the couple of third-party games they showed in the trailer is ALL the third-party support the WiiU's getting for it's entire lifespan, perhaps it is YOUR brain that doesn't work.
3. I actually DO have a single "shred" that this won't be a gigantic failure. in fact, I have several. first off, reactions from the showfloor have been nothing but positive. literally, NO negative comments. and this is the prototype mind you, we'll see the actual final product next year. next, it's a Nintendo console. it won't fail financially.
4. I never said that gimmicks made for a better game. I said that some extras make games more fun. and if your idea of a "good gimmick" (an oxymoron) is having to wear 3D glasses to play a game, then you have absolutely no grounds to judge any gimmick or extra or anything EVER.
5. it actually DOES beat the PS3 technically. actually RESEARCH this thing before you lead your little temper tantrum against it. watch the demonstration with the bird, rendered in real time, by a PROTOTYPE.
6. whether or not the WiiU beats the PS3 "on library" is purely subjective. I have both a Wii and a PS3. They both have some AMAZING games (LittleBigPlanet, Brawl, inFAMOUS, Mario Galaxy 2, etc.). so yeah, to quote The Dude, that's just like, your opinion, man.
7. it isn't unique in offering a gimmick? so the best console is the one with the best gimmick? ... whatever pal... whatever... I'll just be over here, playing games for things like "fun" and "good gameplay" and such...