EA Admits That SimCity Could Have Been Offline
- Thread starter Earnest Cavalli
- Start date
Oh Maxis... How I miss your independent days. This could have been a game I would have bought. Too bad EA insisted you had to have online DRM shoved in.
I don't disagree with you, I was just pointing out the uselessness of claiming artistic integrity in the current state of gaming. Maybe in 10 years or so we will see enough artistic games to really make that push, but currently it is an entertainment industry that occasionally has some artistic merit.zinho73 said:
Uh, no.
It is EXACTLY our place to question their so-called "artistic vision" because it did nothing but compromise the consumer experience.
When is this excuse going to be shamed until corporations stop using it to justify their scummy business practices? I'm already sick and tired of the "artistic integrity" card that apparently everyone wants to copy from Bioware.
It is EXACTLY our place to question their so-called "artistic vision" because it did nothing but compromise the consumer experience.
When is this excuse going to be shamed until corporations stop using it to justify their scummy business practices? I'm already sick and tired of the "artistic integrity" card that apparently everyone wants to copy from Bioware.
No one who witnessed Diablo III's belly-flop at launch couldn't have seen this coming, but I must give EA credit for managing to surprise me at just how badly their train flew off the rails. I assumed that if they were going the whole hog with always online they would at least relegate a substantial amount of info to the server-side so that a cracked copy wouldn't really offer any functionality. But when the mod community peaked under the hood and found it was nothing more than a back-to-base alarm for not being connected, it was almost too funny to believe.
It just goes to show that EA are incredibly out of touch with the broader community of Sim City fans, despite their constant claims to the opposite. Anyone who has even vaguely glanced in the direction of SimTropolis in the past few years would have known that an army of people with vast modding experience would have been picking the guts of this program apart the second it was released. Did they really think they wouldn't get caught with their pants down? Clearly not. EA have obviously decided that their core audience for the franchise are people who like Farmville, and tailored their expectations accordingly.
Of course, this bubble being popped won't stop the board from giving the CEO another huge bonus, nor the PR team calling this a 'success' because enough people bought the game before discovering the litany of flaws within.
It just goes to show that EA are incredibly out of touch with the broader community of Sim City fans, despite their constant claims to the opposite. Anyone who has even vaguely glanced in the direction of SimTropolis in the past few years would have known that an army of people with vast modding experience would have been picking the guts of this program apart the second it was released. Did they really think they wouldn't get caught with their pants down? Clearly not. EA have obviously decided that their core audience for the franchise are people who like Farmville, and tailored their expectations accordingly.
Of course, this bubble being popped won't stop the board from giving the CEO another huge bonus, nor the PR team calling this a 'success' because enough people bought the game before discovering the litany of flaws within.
True, but then again it's better than nothing. You can bet that EA are going to release a DLC for bigger cities, more connected cities and better roads. All $10 each.1337mokro said:
Goddamnit, this game is yet another incredibly fun and flawed game. The problem is that is just fun enough for me to overlook SOME of the flaws, and try to find ways around them. Urgh, I know I shouldn't be. It's working around the problems rather than getting Maxis to fix it.
Anyway, no formal attire, but you may want a haz-mat suit.
Oh yes! I will NOT be surprised if we get a Transit Pack, a Larger Housing Pack, An Obama Care Pack (this would actually be quite funny), A Tycoon Pack, An Entertainment Pack, A More Workers Pack, A Decorative Pack, An Actual Cities Pack, An Offline Mode Pack, A Communist Russia Pack, An I Can Do This All Day Pack.Lil_Rimmy said:
I just (again) built to the very edge of my city, at most I can cram like 150-200k into one city AND still keep it entirely self sufficient. It just drives me mad because if all those little cities could just be consolidated in ONE piece of land I could design the city I actually wanted rather than cramming everything into a weird awkward Square.
What's worse is that this COULD work. If they had done it like the Anno games. Where each city is still being simulated when you leave. Even with friends unless they are playing the cities stop dead. This ruins the dynamic they were going for. They could even bring it back, WAY back all the way down to just Numbers if it is to graphically intensive. Just have the city run in a giant simplified spread sheet (x amount of workers, bring in x amount of money, at x amount of cost).
I can't wear a Haz Mat suit. I have to build a big Fire Station AND a University AND an engineering department before I can unlock those.
I have no issue with their grand vision of interconnected cities living together in simulation. After all, real-world cities don't live in isolation. It's a really cool idea. The issue I have is that they force the player into it. All they had to do was offer the player THE CHOICE to play offline or online with everyone else. How fucked is it that she straight up admitted they knew a lot of fans wanted a single-player experience but they said "Nah, fuck that. We know what you need. Stuff you don't want!"
Of course, given how horrible the online experience has been so far I gather nobody would be playing it online if there was an option. Then again, if only half the player base was playing online, maybe the issues wouldn't be so bad? Who knows. There's apparently a lot more issues than just server unavailability.
Also, I really don't appreciate how they couch all this always-online stuff in terms of creative vision rather than what it really is. I mean, they basically can't admit the truth, but that doesn't mean they have to coat that shit in chocolate and tell us it's truffles.
Of course, given how horrible the online experience has been so far I gather nobody would be playing it online if there was an option. Then again, if only half the player base was playing online, maybe the issues wouldn't be so bad? Who knows. There's apparently a lot more issues than just server unavailability.
Also, I really don't appreciate how they couch all this always-online stuff in terms of creative vision rather than what it really is. I mean, they basically can't admit the truth, but that doesn't mean they have to coat that shit in chocolate and tell us it's truffles.
Don't forget the "Aliens" pack and then the "Tropic Holiday" pack, and before you know it's the Sims, but just reallllllly zoomed out. Coming soon... YOU CAN GET A DOG!... (For $20).1337mokro said:
And yeah, I agree, the whole stupid "pause" when you leave a city pisses me right off. It get's really annoying when I leave a city to make some money and visit another which has money, to upgrade it or whatever, and then you realise that the other city can't earn any money unless you sit there and watch it. And wait. And wait. Man, I wish they hadn't disabled Cheeta mode.
I think that number crunching should be their solution. I remember, in Oblivion and Morrowind and Skyrim, whenever you were not in an area, it was still persistent, but just as numbers. So when you returned, everyone would be different, they would have gone to work or home, but it was all just numbers. That's how mods worked as well. Zombies would "infect" and spawn more zombies in a town, but unless the player was there they weren't actually there, just numbers. Simcity could use the same system, and people would freakin' rejoice.
Anyway, I'm sure you can afford a big Fire Station soon, I have the department of safety! And you the department of education, right? Then why the hell can't I build my University?!
Honestly, I'm not bothered that they wanted to add a multiplayer aspect to the game. It seems cool, and if I had the Internet connection to support it I'd give it a shot. What bothers me is that, as we've all suspected and has now been confirmed, the game easily could have also been released with a singleplayer mode, but wasn't. Rather than just releasing both to encompass as many customers and play styles as possible, they took away a lucrative and expected choice (given the nature of the game) and now have the gall to say it somehow "enhances" the game. When it comes to a game like Sim City, which at its core is about building and running things as you envision them, your goal as a gamemaker shouldn't be to shuffle the players down the narrowest corridor you can make. It should be to give them as many corridors as possible to explore and leave them the hell alone so they can explore them how and when they please.
You couldn't be more right that this won't change anything and that they got paid so they won. All I have to do is look at the #1 digital sales SINCE RELEASE at amazon and its SimCity. It has stayed the #1 seller despite the 2k 1 star reviews, being taken off amazon briefly after servers went to hell, and all the horrible media press bashing this game.TheCommanders said:
No matter how much we say we hate this and won't support it wont change a thing because they got paid so they think it is what we want.
As long as EA can keep using games people can't resist playing despite whatever horrible crap they put with it, they can make Always-on-connections a standard practice by holding people's favorite titles hostage.
The saddest thing in all of this is people just can't help themselves.
Train wreck after train wreck... and yet, they still make money.
You know, I remember from a Dilbert cartoon it was better to be a well-known screw up than a competent nobody. I can't honestly believe this is true for entire organisations as well as people.
You know, I remember from a Dilbert cartoon it was better to be a well-known screw up than a competent nobody. I can't honestly believe this is true for entire organisations as well as people.
Uh...still not seeing how having a single player mode would have ruined the artistic integrity of the game. The multiplayer's a pretty cool idea, but do you know what else is a great idea? Being able to play the game.
The always-online is poorly disguised DRM. Maxis knows it, and we all know it. They don't need to play the bullshit "artistic integrity" card like Bioware did when they rushed out the ME3 ending or whatever the hell happened there. They should either own up to it or be quiet and learn something from this shitstorm they created.
The always-online is poorly disguised DRM. Maxis knows it, and we all know it. They don't need to play the bullshit "artistic integrity" card like Bioware did when they rushed out the ME3 ending or whatever the hell happened there. They should either own up to it or be quiet and learn something from this shitstorm they created.
If your "vision" completley cripples the players' ability to play the damn game, you are - in no uncertain terms - a very bad developer.
this statement is bullshit. First, you have no idea if it has saved or not since you don't get an option to save when you exit. All you are hoping for is that it does. Second, this feature has crashed my city and forced me to Rollback in no less than 4 occasions.
Aaaaand crash and burn.
RIP: SimCity. I guess you had a good run. A shame you didn't even get a bloody month in before you imploded in on yourself.
RIP: SimCity. I guess you had a good run. A shame you didn't even get a bloody month in before you imploded in on yourself.
In response to the claims of this bad PR not doing anything you guys should really check out EA's stock when such events happen. EA is a company that's at best stagnating and you can see that in regards to the fact that they haven't even come close to recovering from the economic recession despite others bouncing back long before now. Sure they receive a bump when a good game is released but in most cases that usually drops right back down as soon as the controversy starts. Yes they still make money but if they were really making as much money as their PR and public opinion said they did then they would be doing far better then they actually are stock wise.GAunderrated said: