I'd like to think EA is above not banning people for failing to report known bugs, but this is the same company who banned someone from Origin (and their games) because someone else cussed at him.
BiH-Kira said:
That is a sure "don't have any contact with EA" sign. Just too bad that fanboys are blind.
Let them be blind. It'll sort itself out.
wombat_of_war said:
GoldenShadow said:
Its just Sim City, who cares if you cheat. It probably has built in cheat codes too.
EA in its infinite wisdom decided to go the route of extensive multiplayer intergration with it hence why they are probably going nuts with the EULA
I'd wager anything that's what they're aiming for.
Due to legal precedence mostly established by Blizzard (and a bit from Autodesk) in several legal battles, if you put the entire game on a mandatory server, you've legally secured your game against everything.
No Contracts of Adhesion. No 1st Sale Doctrine or Used Game market.
It allows for robust measures to discourage returns (by threatening your OTHER purchases with them, natch) without actually breaking any return/refund laws. Loopholes that can slip around some consumer-protection laws (though I do believe several countries outside of the US are cracking down on this).
It even enables planned obsolescence since if the game goes down, oh wells, guess the fans will have to buy the new one at full price again.
Rawne1980 said:
That would require Bathesda to bug test their games first ... badum tish (I love their games but by christ do they have some bugs in them).
On Topic....
Bugémon ... gotta catch em all.
That's OK, because Bethesda has been perfectly happy to just let their fanbase bug-test AND fix it for them.