The cpu is more akin to the kind of cpus you find in tablets. It's not a match for even a modern dual core. Anandtech have an article on the jaguar architecture. Don't get me wrong, it's a fantastic architecture from amd, but it's a netbook one, not a high performance one (i.e. desktop pc and normal sized laptop) like Intel core or amd bulldozer.Another said:Ahahahahahaha! I built most of my pc 3 years ago, and I still have better stats than the Xbox one and PS4 (Exception is processor, have better clock speed but fewer cores). Only thing I upgraded was my graphics card recently to a 680.
God, the industry as a whole has just been painful to listen to the last few days.
My knowledge of PC's and PC gaming can be visually expressed by the number zero and yet even I can see the bait there. In terms of sheer, raw, power the PS4 and XBone are going to stay on one constant level while PC's just get stronger and stronger. Maybe right this instant the PS4 and XBone are more powerful than gaming PC's (right this moment as I type) but before the end of the third year Laptops with enough shit in it will out-stripe both consoles.Kargathia said:Honestly, that's troll bait if ever I saw it.
Has there ever been a console released that has not claimed this prior to launch?The technology powering these games takes realism to a whole new level.
These next-gen platforms create dynamic, living worlds.
Maybe he meant HIS highest end PC he's rocking that netbook like it's 2009.Octorok said:Putting to one side the preposterous claim that the new consoles are ahead of the highest end PCs, they aren't even better than the PC I bought in November last year. I'm not trying to be a snob, I know plenty of people can't afford a gaming PC, but we're talking about expensive electronic luxuries here.
Granted, I spent a lot on my PC, but I'm still an unemployed student, not an oil baron.
I guess when this guy said "highest end" he meant "my laptop that I use for Facebook".