Couldn't have said it better myself.DVS BSTrD said:Too little too late my friend.
Couldn't have said it better myself.DVS BSTrD said:Too little too late my friend.
I mean, it's good that the Worst Company thing has woken them up a bit, but there's no way that they're going to compete with Valve on any level. Even if they polished our balls, people will argue it's not better than the wait for Half Life 3: Episode 3: Return of Dr. Freeman.Zachary Amaranth said:Which is why people will ***** about this move.mad825 said:The only good news is bad news.
People are still going to hate anyway, it's not Steam.
"Hey guys, we're being less douchey to our customers."
"WAAAAAAAAAAAH YOU SUCK!"
When the police catch you driving drunk, they don't impound your car but revoke your license.synobal said:Wow seriously? So because you post something that they don't like on their online forums they have the right to keep you from a product you paid for? How does, me being mean on their forums have anything to do with me playing I dunno 'need for speed grand pursuit three' or what ever?Beautiful End said:Well, I see this as a good act of...whatever. I mean, those "offenders" have it coming anyway. For the most part, they're not banned because it's cloudy outside. And it seems they even get a first-time warning (72 hours-ban period).
Yeah, losing access to your account and games sucks. But hey, don't go trolling people and being rude and you'll be safe.
And again, I say for the most part. I know there are some cases of being unfairly banned. But again! For the most part. We got that, right?
At any rate, EA still sucks for reasons other than this. If they're trying to get rid of their bad reputation, there are other things they should prioritize *coughonlinepassescough*.
And this is why consumers are losing rights left and right to large corporations, because we think it's okay for them to screw us.Roboto said:synobal said:Wow seriously? So because you post something that they don't like on their online forums they have the right to keep you from a product you paid for? How does, me being mean on their forums have anything to do with me playing I dunno 'need for speed grand pursuit three' or what ever?Beautiful End said:Well, I see this as a good act of...whatever. I mean, those "offenders" have it coming anyway. For the most part, they're not banned because it's cloudy outside. And it seems they even get a first-time warning (72 hours-ban period).
Yeah, losing access to your account and games sucks. But hey, don't go trolling people and being rude and you'll be safe.
And again, I say for the most part. I know there are some cases of being unfairly banned. But again! For the most part. We got that, right?
At any rate, EA still sucks for reasons other than this. If they're trying to get rid of their bad reputation, there are other things they should prioritize *coughonlinepassescough*.
When the police catch you driving drunk, they don't impound your car but revoke your license.
The software is still installed on the banned users' PCs, they just lost their license to use it.
I remember having to pay for my driving license..
They're not doing it because they think it will make them better. They're doing it so the people will still buy their games.Sober Thal said:For shame EA, you shouldn't have caved on this one.
Small problem with your statement. These companies don't do it unprovoked. You act like an idiot, they ban you, you forfeit your right to use their online services. Money doesn't entitle you to be a prick to others. And EA isn't the only company that does this. It kind of goes back to the whole "no shoes no shirt no service" thing.synobal said:And this is why consumers are losing rights left and right to large corporations, because we think it's okay for them to screw us.Roboto said:synobal said:Wow seriously? So because you post something that they don't like on their online forums they have the right to keep you from a product you paid for? How does, me being mean on their forums have anything to do with me playing I dunno 'need for speed grand pursuit three' or what ever?Beautiful End said:Well, I see this as a good act of...whatever. I mean, those "offenders" have it coming anyway. For the most part, they're not banned because it's cloudy outside. And it seems they even get a first-time warning (72 hours-ban period).
Yeah, losing access to your account and games sucks. But hey, don't go trolling people and being rude and you'll be safe.
And again, I say for the most part. I know there are some cases of being unfairly banned. But again! For the most part. We got that, right?
At any rate, EA still sucks for reasons other than this. If they're trying to get rid of their bad reputation, there are other things they should prioritize *coughonlinepassescough*.
When the police catch you driving drunk, they don't impound your car but revoke your license.
The software is still installed on the banned users' PCs, they just lost their license to use it.
I remember having to pay for my driving license..
You seem to think people only get banned for being trolls.Aeonknight said:Small problem with your statement. These companies don't do it unprovoked. You act like an idiot, they ban you, you forfeit your right to use their online services. Money doesn't entitle you to be a prick to others. And EA isn't the only company that does this. It kind of goes back to the whole "no shoes no shirt no service" thing.synobal said:And this is why consumers are losing rights left and right to large corporations, because we think it's okay for them to screw us.Roboto said:synobal said:Wow seriously? So because you post something that they don't like on their online forums they have the right to keep you from a product you paid for? How does, me being mean on their forums have anything to do with me playing I dunno 'need for speed grand pursuit three' or what ever?Beautiful End said:Well, I see this as a good act of...whatever. I mean, those "offenders" have it coming anyway. For the most part, they're not banned because it's cloudy outside. And it seems they even get a first-time warning (72 hours-ban period).
Yeah, losing access to your account and games sucks. But hey, don't go trolling people and being rude and you'll be safe.
And again, I say for the most part. I know there are some cases of being unfairly banned. But again! For the most part. We got that, right?
At any rate, EA still sucks for reasons other than this. If they're trying to get rid of their bad reputation, there are other things they should prioritize *coughonlinepassescough*.
When the police catch you driving drunk, they don't impound your car but revoke your license.
The software is still installed on the banned users' PCs, they just lost their license to use it.
I remember having to pay for my driving license..
Oh I know full well there are a few undeserved bannings. But I don't flaunt those specific instances as if it were the case 99% of the time like you. But of course it's only the loud ones that get heard.synobal said:You seem to think people only get banned for being trolls.Aeonknight said:Small problem with your statement. These companies don't do it unprovoked. You act like an idiot, they ban you, you forfeit your right to use their online services. Money doesn't entitle you to be a prick to others. And EA isn't the only company that does this. It kind of goes back to the whole "no shoes no shirt no service" thing.synobal said:And this is why consumers are losing rights left and right to large corporations, because we think it's okay for them to screw us.Roboto said:synobal said:Wow seriously? So because you post something that they don't like on their online forums they have the right to keep you from a product you paid for? How does, me being mean on their forums have anything to do with me playing I dunno 'need for speed grand pursuit three' or what ever?Beautiful End said:Well, I see this as a good act of...whatever. I mean, those "offenders" have it coming anyway. For the most part, they're not banned because it's cloudy outside. And it seems they even get a first-time warning (72 hours-ban period).
Yeah, losing access to your account and games sucks. But hey, don't go trolling people and being rude and you'll be safe.
And again, I say for the most part. I know there are some cases of being unfairly banned. But again! For the most part. We got that, right?
At any rate, EA still sucks for reasons other than this. If they're trying to get rid of their bad reputation, there are other things they should prioritize *coughonlinepassescough*.
When the police catch you driving drunk, they don't impound your car but revoke your license.
The software is still installed on the banned users' PCs, they just lost their license to use it.
I remember having to pay for my driving license..
People don't just get banned for being trolls, they get banned for no reason, for silly reasons, or because a mod doesn't like said person.
Random EA ban exhibit A [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/9.328868-EA-now-issuing-permanent-Origin-bans-through-content-filter?page=1]
Better to hang an innocent man than let a guilty one go free huh? Well if that's how you see things then I guess nothing is going to change that.Aeonknight said:Oh I know full well there are a few undeserved bannings. But I don't flaunt those specific instances as if it were the case 99% of the time like you. But of course it's only the loud ones that get heard.synobal said:You seem to think people only get banned for being trolls.Aeonknight said:Small problem with your statement. These companies don't do it unprovoked. You act like an idiot, they ban you, you forfeit your right to use their online services. Money doesn't entitle you to be a prick to others. And EA isn't the only company that does this. It kind of goes back to the whole "no shoes no shirt no service" thing.synobal said:And this is why consumers are losing rights left and right to large corporations, because we think it's okay for them to screw us.Roboto said:synobal said:Wow seriously? So because you post something that they don't like on their online forums they have the right to keep you from a product you paid for? How does, me being mean on their forums have anything to do with me playing I dunno 'need for speed grand pursuit three' or what ever?Beautiful End said:Well, I see this as a good act of...whatever. I mean, those "offenders" have it coming anyway. For the most part, they're not banned because it's cloudy outside. And it seems they even get a first-time warning (72 hours-ban period).
Yeah, losing access to your account and games sucks. But hey, don't go trolling people and being rude and you'll be safe.
And again, I say for the most part. I know there are some cases of being unfairly banned. But again! For the most part. We got that, right?
At any rate, EA still sucks for reasons other than this. If they're trying to get rid of their bad reputation, there are other things they should prioritize *coughonlinepassescough*.
When the police catch you driving drunk, they don't impound your car but revoke your license.
The software is still installed on the banned users' PCs, they just lost their license to use it.
I remember having to pay for my driving license..
People don't just get banned for being trolls, they get banned for no reason, for silly reasons, or because a mod doesn't like said person.
Random EA ban exhibit A [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/9.328868-EA-now-issuing-permanent-Origin-bans-through-content-filter?page=1]
Personally I'd say he deserves the ban if nothing else than for that fucking arrow in the knee joke. But I'm just spiteful like that.
Considering the ratio of guilty over innocent that are banned? Lesser of 2 evils in my book. And the innocent's banning can always be reversed, even if it means going through a few hours of annoying customer service. But like I said, this isn't exclusive to EA.synobal said:Better to hang an innocent man than let a guilty one go free huh? Well if that's how you see things then I guess nothing is going to change that.Aeonknight said:Oh I know full well there are a few undeserved bannings. But I don't flaunt those specific instances as if it were the case 99% of the time like you. But of course it's only the loud ones that get heard.synobal said:You seem to think people only get banned for being trolls.Aeonknight said:Small problem with your statement. These companies don't do it unprovoked. You act like an idiot, they ban you, you forfeit your right to use their online services. Money doesn't entitle you to be a prick to others. And EA isn't the only company that does this. It kind of goes back to the whole "no shoes no shirt no service" thing.synobal said:And this is why consumers are losing rights left and right to large corporations, because we think it's okay for them to screw us.Roboto said:synobal said:Wow seriously? So because you post something that they don't like on their online forums they have the right to keep you from a product you paid for? How does, me being mean on their forums have anything to do with me playing I dunno 'need for speed grand pursuit three' or what ever?Beautiful End said:Well, I see this as a good act of...whatever. I mean, those "offenders" have it coming anyway. For the most part, they're not banned because it's cloudy outside. And it seems they even get a first-time warning (72 hours-ban period).
Yeah, losing access to your account and games sucks. But hey, don't go trolling people and being rude and you'll be safe.
And again, I say for the most part. I know there are some cases of being unfairly banned. But again! For the most part. We got that, right?
At any rate, EA still sucks for reasons other than this. If they're trying to get rid of their bad reputation, there are other things they should prioritize *coughonlinepassescough*.
When the police catch you driving drunk, they don't impound your car but revoke your license.
The software is still installed on the banned users' PCs, they just lost their license to use it.
I remember having to pay for my driving license..
People don't just get banned for being trolls, they get banned for no reason, for silly reasons, or because a mod doesn't like said person.
Random EA ban exhibit A [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/9.328868-EA-now-issuing-permanent-Origin-bans-through-content-filter?page=1]
Personally I'd say he deserves the ban if nothing else than for that fucking arrow in the knee joke. But I'm just spiteful like that.
Ooookay.Roboto said:When the police catch you driving drunk, they don't impound your car but revoke your license.
The software is still installed on the banned users' PCs, they just lost their license to use it.
I remember having to pay for my driving license..
The lesser of 2 evils implies that those 2 are the only option.Aeonknight said:Considering the ratio of guilty over innocent that are banned? Lesser of 2 evils in my book. And the innocent's banning can always be reversed, even if it means going through a few hours of annoying customer service. But like I said, this isn't exclusive to EA.
Would you rather they didn't?Brad Shepard said:this is backpedaling at its finest folks.