Putting it in the simplest words: Doesn't want to be worst yet doesn't try to stop being the worst.
Yeah, they stuffed up with Sim City, but most bad rep they get seems to be people not realising that they don't actually make most of the games, they publish them. People blamed EA for Bioware's latest few games (when really the only game that Bioware made that did suffer from EA was Dragon Age 2, but even then that game is still playable and enjoyable, if a little lacking in some areas), instead of saying, "Maybe I just don't like this" a majority of people on this site say, "THIS GAME IS TERRIBLE AND THAT IS A FACT THERE IS NOTHING REDEEMING ABOUT THIS GAME IF YOU LIKE IT YOU'RE AN IDIOT". The thing that I find most interesting is people assuming the worst immediately. As someone who does not have Xbox Live nor the ability to connect my Xbox to the internet, I found that Dead Space 3 was an excellent game and at no point did I feel as though the game was made harder to encourage micro transactions, but what did some forum posters say about this? They screamed and yelled that it would destroy the integrity of the game and that the single player would be warped so as that people would be forced to make the micro transactions, WHICH WAS WRONG.RatherDull said:Knowing the kind of idiots that get into these situations, they don't really listen to lower sales either. They just continue to make excuses.
Dexter111 said:You've been quoted here: http://consumerist.com/2013/04/05/ea-admits-it-can-do-better-but-blames-worst-company-success-on-homophobes-and-whiny-madden-fans/Xdeser2 said:NO EA! You do not get to Spin the story and take the Moral high ground on this shit! Dont try to fool people by lumping these intolerant assholes with the people actually making legitimate complaints against your practices. You dont get to try to make yourself look progressive like that.
(As you can tell, Im a bit passionate about this lol)
Still though, I'm glad Grey posted this without much opinion on it all, leave it a bit ambiguous lol
It's a pretty good rebuttal piece.
Gotta love some of that bite:
And in an EA.com blog post, Chief Operating Officer Peter Moore does admit to mistakes and promise to ?do better.? But, for reasons we can?t even begin to fathom, he didn?t stop there.
[...]
?This is the same poll that last year judged us as worse than companies responsible for the biggest oil spill in history,? writes Moore. He?s obviously referencing the 2011 champ BP, except BP wasn?t even in the bracket last year. In response to Moore?s statement, we?d like to take a moment to explain that our ?Worst Company in America? contest exists within the context of this website, which is about consumers and their relationship to the marketplace and to businesses. Just to be clear: The point of this contest, now in its 8th year, is to enable consumers to send a message to a company that provides goods or services to them. Winning this contest means your customers are trying to tell you something. And that something is that you, out of all the companies, most deserve a plastic poop trophy.
[...]
Here?s our question to Peter Moore: If your entire industry is engaged in the production of something so trivial as to not warrant inclusion in a contest that features a poop trophy, why do you even work in it?
Everyone is entitled to their opinions but I just wish you wouldn't marginalize people's legitimate complaints by saying that they are just complaining because it is popular.Johny_X2 said:At least they are FINALLY doing something about their PR. It might be too late but whatever.
Calling them the worst company in america may be overdoing it though. and Peter is right in saying that some of the reasons are ridiculous.
To be completely honest, I think that a lot of hate EA's receiving is misdirected. Yeah, sure, they are a terrible publisher, their business practices are bullshit and they don't exactly treat their IP right. but the Sim City flop? Ubisoft has done this with the same results. Blizzard has done this with the same results. Sure, EA didn't win any points for repeating the obvious mistakes of other companies but the amount of hate that they are receiving for that is disproportional. People hate them because it's cool to hate EA. They are a convenient target. It seems a bit hypocritical to me.
Now I'm not defending EA. They have made shitty decisions and angered a lot of people, myself included. They definitely are a bad company (not the WORST in america mind you). But people should try and exercise critical thought before they start relentlessly bashing on someone because everyone else does.
that's true and I'm definitely not trying to defend EA. I'm just saying the hate is kind of getting out of hand. There are legitimate complaints to be made and they have been fucking up constantly for the last few years but if you look at the popular opinion, you get people saying that EA should go bankrupt and that it's a lot better than EA improving their business practices. Why? Beats me. Apparently, it's because 'we hate EA and want it to die'. Now you've got to admit that's a bit extreme. And that's just one example.GAunderrated said:Everyone is entitled to their opinions but I just wish you wouldn't marginalize people's legitimate complaints by saying that they are just complaining because it is popular.Johny_X2 said:At least they are FINALLY doing something about their PR. It might be too late but whatever.
Calling them the worst company in america may be overdoing it though. and Peter is right in saying that some of the reasons are ridiculous.
To be completely honest, I think that a lot of hate EA's receiving is misdirected. Yeah, sure, they are a terrible publisher, their business practices are bullshit and they don't exactly treat their IP right. but the Sim City flop? Ubisoft has done this with the same results. Blizzard has done this with the same results. Sure, EA didn't win any points for repeating the obvious mistakes of other companies but the amount of hate that they are receiving for that is disproportional. People hate them because it's cool to hate EA. They are a convenient target. It seems a bit hypocritical to me.
Now I'm not defending EA. They have made shitty decisions and angered a lot of people, myself included. They definitely are a bad company (not the WORST in america mind you). But people should try and exercise critical thought before they start relentlessly bashing on someone because everyone else does.
I've seen very few responses that have been hating on EA for the sake of it. Most of people's anger is expressed through one of the MANY time EA has fucked up. I mean if you keep pissing on your consumers eventually everyone will have the same opinion of you.
I'm really trying to not sound like a dick about it so I hope I don't come off this way. However, the part I highlighted is what I mean about marginalizing people legitimate complaints.Johny_X2 said:that's true and I'm definitely not trying to defend EA. I'm just saying the hate is kind of getting out of hand. There are legitimate complaints to be made and they have been fucking up constantly for the last few years but if you look at the popular opinion, you get people saying that EA should go bankrupt and that it's a lot better than EA improving their business practices. Why? Beats me. Apparently, it's because 'we hate EA and want it to die'. Now you've got to admit that's a bit extreme. And that's just one example.GAunderrated said:Everyone is entitled to their opinions but I just wish you wouldn't marginalize people's legitimate complaints by saying that they are just complaining because it is popular.Johny_X2 said:At least they are FINALLY doing something about their PR. It might be too late but whatever.
Calling them the worst company in america may be overdoing it though. and Peter is right in saying that some of the reasons are ridiculous.
To be completely honest, I think that a lot of hate EA's receiving is misdirected. Yeah, sure, they are a terrible publisher, their business practices are bullshit and they don't exactly treat their IP right. but the Sim City flop? Ubisoft has done this with the same results. Blizzard has done this with the same results. Sure, EA didn't win any points for repeating the obvious mistakes of other companies but the amount of hate that they are receiving for that is disproportional. People hate them because it's cool to hate EA. They are a convenient target. It seems a bit hypocritical to me.
Now I'm not defending EA. They have made shitty decisions and angered a lot of people, myself included. They definitely are a bad company (not the WORST in america mind you). But people should try and exercise critical thought before they start relentlessly bashing on someone because everyone else does.
I've seen very few responses that have been hating on EA for the sake of it. Most of people's anger is expressed through one of the MANY time EA has fucked up. I mean if you keep pissing on your consumers eventually everyone will have the same opinion of you.
I'm not saying that complaints made against EA are not legitimate. They definitely are. It's just that some people are overdoing it with the hate. And quite a few only hate it because other people do, without even knowing the reason.
Oh, don't get me wrong. I'm really not trying to defend EA, nor am I trying to, as you put it, marginalise the legitimate complaints because as I said, the legitimate complaints and reasons for hating EA are definitely there and there are quite a few of them. And I imagine that most people (well most people with above-average intelligence at least) would have a very concrete reason for not liking EA. Just like you do. And just like I do.GAunderrated said:snip