Nothing against the convention, but doesn't "gaymer" sound more like an insult hurled by a 5 year old playing Call of Duty?
Thats like saying being friends with a black person to prove you aren't racist is a good thing.Ympulse said:So much hate, and it's not even tasteful.DVS BSTrD said:Well I think the gaymers know the perfect place EA can shuv their transparent PR stunt.
Actions speak louder than words, and EA is doing the right thing, in my opinion. Even if this is just a PR stunt, the backing of a major publisher is going to help the "gaymer" effort that much more, which frankly, isn't a bad thing.
This. EA may be the scourge of the gaming world, but credit where credits due; they're doing a good thing here, regardless of whether it's a PR stunt or not.theflyingpeanut said:There are a number of reasons for me not liking EA, but I ain't gonna deny that they're doing a good thing here. Maybe not for some lovely, kind reasons, but it's still a good thing. But is no-one else finding the idea of the Xbox Live team being at this just hilarious. Because it's tickling me in such a beautiful and dirty way.
Nobody said that GaymerCon shouldn't be done and organizers should be slowly killed.ninten766 said:First I'm just going to say good move on EA, regardless of their intentions. We need more of this.
Second, I'm going to make a couple of points about the "Is Gaymercon necessary?" topic:
1. I think the most important question some people in this thread need to ask themselves is: Does it have to be justified at all? Does the people behind this con need to come up with a justification for its existence beyond "we want to do it"? AT ALL? I personally think not. I think that even if Gaymercon was completely superfluous and unnecessary (which I personally believe is not the case) it would still be a good idea. And you guys do realize that there are, in fact, cons that cater to specific minorities in other fandoms, right? Geek Girl Con and Gaylaxicon come to mind. Also, do you guys realize how fucked up it is for people in a privileged group to ask people in a marginalized group to justify their having nice things of their own? The unfortunate implication being that if they can't justify their having nice things of their own then they shouldn't have nice things of their own.
2. There are, in fact, many reasons why this con should exist and is important. I personally believe the most important and relevant is that a lot of people wanted this to happen, which is proven by the fact that this con got the support it did from people. Also, safe spaces are really important and some people feel more comfortable among their own. A lot of us in the LGBT community don't feel we can truly be ourselves when surrounded by straight people. This is specially true for trans* folk. Also, this helps with visibility, a lack of which has always been a problem for the LGBT community and has been used both in the past and in the present to marginalize us. The fact that we're not a physically visible minority means that unless we make a racket people can act like we don't exist.
3. LGBT people are NOT a monolith: Not all people within the LGBT community have the same opinions and think the same way. This should really go without saying but it seems that some pople don't get it. You see, not all LGBT folk want to assimilate at all. Some within the LGBT community (and this is true for all minority groups) don't care or even want to be seen as normal and have no problem segregating. Some even actively oppose the idea of assimilation! Also, Gaymercon wasn't organized by "the gay community". It was organized by the people who organized gaymercon, and it got the support of individuals within the LGBT community. We're not an amourphous blob who thinks and acts as one.
4. Please stop concern trolling. It's annoying. Unless you belong to the LGBT community you have nothing to gain or lose from whether Gaymercon helps the cause of equality in the gaming community or not. So please stop telling us what we should and shouldn't do or how we should go about doing it, because it's really fucking annoying. It's like backseat driving, except worse.
Honestly, I'm not even sure why I was surprised by the negative reaction Gaymercon got from many people. This is what has happened to every marginalized group every time they try to carve spaces of their own. Every. Single. Time.
I could say the opposite in a manner and say that at conventions I've been to there has been little for gay people. If there's a niche in the market then there is nothing wrong with filling that niche. The fact they have been so successful in funding and support shows there is a gap in the market. That is just the argument from a purely business stance.nodlimax said:Honestly I don't get it.
Why do you need to bring up you sexuality at gaming convention? The last time I was on a gaming related convention there wasn't anything that I would've described as "not for gay people". In addition the stuff that is related to sex usually is presented on other conventions....
Those things are not mutually exclusive. They WILL be talking about games and geeky things, and they'll be talking about gay issues in geek culture too. You can talk about both.And also i don't get why you need to talk to people about beeing gay. It's a gaming convention. Go and talk about games for crying out loud!
That really got to me you know. In parts of the world you will be IMPRISONED OR EXECUTED for being gay. It's the law, and even where it's not it can still happen. My ex was beaten up in the street in broad daylight by a group of grown men because her and her girlfriend were walking along holding hands. This wasn't in Iran, or Alabama, but in a sleepy little town in Northern England in 2012. One of her friends was forced to flee her country, leaving her family and successful career behind, because she was going to go to prison for being gay.Oh and about the beeing "normal" thing. Beeing normal is so overrated. "Normal" people behave like sheep without personality. They don't want to stick out of the croud. They're boring. Accept and embrace that you're not normal.....
Since when is gaming considered to be normal? The media and politicians target gamers all the time (violence, hygene, social stuff and so on). If you want to be normal, stop playing games.
I know that everyone is allowed to attend, but it still is focusing on gay gamers, and making us out to be something a bit different, even if it is supposed to be a positive message. As I said, there is a time and place, but sadly, it isn't just that time yet, at least I don't feel like it is. I could be wrong, it might actually be helpful, but I just don't see this really helping the LGBT community further its cause. Maybe I'm just pessamistic, and I hope that it turns out for the best, but I don't see it really breaking boundaries.VinLAURiA said:Gaymercon is actually an all-inclusive event and even straight people are allowed to attend. It's not trying to be separatist, it's trying to be just another con with an emphasis on tolerating gays. You can mull over how effective that a convention that explicitly bases itself around this purpose is in breaking down these barriers, but it's a step in the right direction.klaynexas3 said:As a bisexual, I only have one problem with gaymercon, as it basically is saying that homosexual and bisexual people, or gamers to be specific, are different from regular ones. There's nothing wrong with pride in who you are, and there is a time for that, but right now is not it. There is still prejudice with it, so to get the equal treatment aspect down, first we need to prove that we are normal, regular people. Gaymercon does not help with this.
Ranting aside, good on EA, for once. While it is the thought that counts most of the time, no one should deny a good act simply because the intentions weren't wholely great. So even if it is a PR stunt, it's at least a good one.
I took umbrage to your first point. You took a sentence and twisted it to suit your need to feel like a victim.latenightapplepie said:I'm not sure which of my two points you're taking umbrage with, but I wasn't joking about either of them.
Disgusting. You are the bigot and the fool you hate if you truly believe being a male heterosexual grants me ANY privilege above any other person. There is no special club with member benefits that comes with it. Guess what, we all get the shit end of the stick in life sometimes.latenightapplepie said:Yawn. Straight privilege defined. Enjoy not being fired for your sexual orientation, and being able to get married, not having to come out to every new person you meet and worrying about how they might react and a host of other things you take completely for granted.
So yeah, we get our LGBT gaming con. And a Pride Parade for an afternoon once every year. But hey, you're still invited. By all means, you're allowed to join in on the fun. Everybody's welcome.
Not everybody's welcome to all those heterosexual privileges though, huh?
Oh sure thing, just cut out the context of the quote, you aren't trying to play victim here at all. Let me quote myself again.latenightapplepie said:Wut.Feel free to replace the word gay with lesbian/bi/transexual/a girl/a 14 year old spouting memes and the word fag/or whatever really.
The point of what I said is, you can handle the situation like a grown adult or you can draw attention to yourself like a 14 year old who draws attention to himself on XBox Live. No one likes that kid on XBox Live. Stop being him.VanQQisH said:There is a fine line between saying "I'm gay and I play video games." and "Look at me! I'm gay and I play video games!"
Feel free to replace the word gay with lesbian/bi/transexual/a girl/a 14 year old spouting memes and the word fag/or whatever really.
I don't think you understand the word "privilege" in the sense that I'm using it. Perhaps I should have used "heterosexism" or "heteronormativity". Whatever.VanQQisH said:snip
Ugh. this is why I seriously wonder why I'm bothering to respond to you at all.unless you were that flamboyantly annoying kid in high school
yeah personally it's a little bit crazy they're having a whole convention thing for this, but hey just cuz I don't throw my support behind something (or may be against the notion of it) doesn't mean I'm raving mad with hatred (just thought I'd throw that in there in case people get irrationally upset)blackrave said:VanQQisH said:What I mean by segregation is labeling themselves differently. They aren't just "gamers' like the rest of us, they want to be "gaymers." It's no different from when a girl labels herself as a "girl gamer." It's just unnecessary. The fact aside that I hate the label gamer as well albeit that's another topic entirely.
About people being vilified about being different, I don't know what it's like in America but where I live, even the most intolerant people never seemed to show any open hatred towards gays or bisexuals so it baffles me why they feel the need to hold an event like this. I've never met a LGBT person that felt like they needed support for their lifestyle choices, they are all well adjusted members of society just living out their life the same as anyone else. That's not to say that persecution for such a trivial matter doesn't exist elsewhere.
Like I said, I have no beef with the people involved or attending the con. People can do as they wish, I just believe there are far better choices available than this.
Exactly. My first thought when reading this newspiece was "screw EA, but there will be homosexual gamer convention? why?"
Like you said it would more efficient way to have a LGBT booth in geek conventions, or have a a geek part in LGBT events, or both.
But separate convention? Really? Seems just plain stupid.
P.S. What next? Convention for lactointoleran bisexual exhebrew muslim gamers who drink only mint-green tea? This sounds as good as GaymerCon.
P.P.S. Regarding hate towards homosexuals in multiplayer- multiplayer is hateful towards EVERYONE. So don't cry about Xbox360 players being hateful to women/homosexuals/negroids/mongoloids/semites/obese/christians/muslims/scientologists/your mamma. But you can cry about them being rude, impolite and full of hate.