EA: "There Is No Feud With Valve"

Craziplaya21

New member
Apr 3, 2010
4
0
0
Therumancer said:
...

EA does have a valid point though about patches and updates and such, from various things I have read, it would be nice if STEAM did make it a bit easier for companies to work on their games, at least for patches. There has been a few annoying moments where a company has had a patch up, but I had to wait to get it for the steam version.
http://www.pcgamer.com/2012/07/12/how-steam-is-about-to-change-its-role/?ref=rss
 

JWAN

New member
Dec 27, 2008
2,725
0
0
tmande2nd said:
felbot said:
say did they ever say what part of the terms of service they disagreed with? i really cannot remember them ever saying what it was.
Apparently because Valve was getting to large a share of DLC revenue over steam.

Like apparently EA WAS NOT GETTING 100% of the money! IT WAS SO CRUEL!
^ Exactly^
And the amount Valve asked for made sense. EA was using THEIR service so they had to pay to use it. EA made their own and it sucks a big, fat, donkey cock (as I predicted) because EA does not but in the same time and effort for their service.
 

Stabby Joe

New member
Jul 30, 2008
1,545
0
0
"There is no feud with Valve" - That is true because a feud would imply a degree of real competition.
 

CD-R

New member
Mar 1, 2009
1,355
0
0
mrhateful said:
The thing that makes EA so fun is they are being comic villains because its like they don't understand economics. They would earn way more if they just focused on being nice and helpful toward the consumer but by doing there anti consumer stance they make them self out to be jackasses, and as such receive less purchases.
Which is weird because they seemed like they were making an effort to clean up their act awhile back.The free map pacls for Bad Company 2. The free stone prisoner dlc for Dragon Age Origins. The free Cerberus Network stuff for Mass Effect 2. Picking up TIm Schafer's Brutal Legend game after Activision baled on him and tried to sue to stop it's release. Its seems like they just gave up.
 

Pearwood

New member
Mar 24, 2010
1,929
0
0
People thought there was a feud? They're running competing services so that on its own is reason for EA to want to keep its own products exclusive, I really doubt there's more to it than that.
 

Ed130 The Vanguard

(Insert witty quote here)
Sep 10, 2008
3,782
0
0
"There is no feud With Valve"

"We have always feuded with Valve"

That's what I get out of this statement. (bonus points if you figure what I mean it out)

Recaptcha: power dressing
 

felbot

Senior Member
May 11, 2011
628
0
21
overtone said:
felbot said:
It's Valve. Gabe's a great friend of EA's. We're a great friend of his, we like to think."
Thats sounds like a plea for help.

'Oh no, our services and evil business practices suck and everyone hates us. Quick! Make it look like we're friends with Valve!'
uh dude i think you qouted the wrong person, i cant remember saying that.
 

Evil Smurf

Admin of Catoholics Anonymous
Nov 11, 2011
11,597
0
0
kajinking said:
Ok all I could think of when I saw the headline was "These are not the droids you are looking for" anyone else? Although is it a Jedi mind trick if done by a Sith?
both have force powers, you know.
 

Darkness665

New member
Dec 21, 2010
193
0
0
EA has several things going on currently. They want to move into mobile, free to play, modify Steam's terms, limit EA games to Origin, always on DRM, must connect to internet and on and on and on.

Also, the company is up for sale @ $20 a share. Right hand, left hand have either of you met brain yet? Cause ruling the world is not happening.

Don't forget they could market Minecraft better then Notch. Just cause they are the guys that brought the Dead Space 2 ads about Moms hating games.

Class act from a class company. Too bad it is all low class.
 

xmbts

Still Approved by Shock
Legacy
May 30, 2010
20,800
37
53
Country
United States
"They have different terms and conditions that they put on their games that don't meet what we would like to do with our gamers."

Uhh...that sounds kind of creepy.

Enemy or not though a rival company making a rival service and claiming that the other cheapens intellectual property hardly seems like friendly interaction.