EA Turns Its Back on Single-Player Games

White-Death

New member
Oct 31, 2011
223
0
0
Hear ye Hear Ye!
The People of the noble Kingdom of Escapistia hath proclaimed that the Interactive entertainment publishing firm, Electronic Arts, Hath contracted a mental disease in which it appears to be attempting to remove itself from the business world of publishing games!

His Royal Highness White Death He who shalt not be named, hath recommended that the people do not purchase their published products as they may be of low standard and quality!
The people hath also proclaimed,that Frank Gibau,is a ****.
 

rob_simple

Elite Member
Aug 8, 2010
1,864
0
41
I really try my best to always give EA the benefit of the doubt --since I believe a lot of people just mindlessly bash the company because it's an easy target-- but sometimes they make it bloody difficult for me.

In this story, especially, they seem to be confusing core demographics with 'what is currently popular' and they're going to be in for a nasty shock when the casuals they're suckering in with their fad-games are spirited away by Nintendo's next gimmick or the next big mobile innovation.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Seems like a self correcting problem to me. To put it simply if a game (other than an MMO) can't stand as a single player experience, I'm not going to have any interest or buy it. To me this announcement is simply that I won't be spending much money on EA products, or even want to, and really that's no big deal as I've never prided myself on any paticular brand loyalty.

That said given that their big money makers ARE multi-player titles, where they can make a bundle on microtransactions for maps, new weapons, etc... it really doesn't surprise me terribly that a company as greedy as EA would be thinking like this.

That said, I don't care if they include multi-player components, as long as they aren't mandatory and it's a complete product that I'm not going to feel shorted on without them. If they pretty much sell their products based entirely around multi player development though, then they simply won't be having me as a customer.

That said we can pretty much say RIP to Bioware at this point. If this annoucement is to be believed, I imagine Bioware isn't long for this world. The reason is simply that Bioware's big selling point, and area of talent, was brilliant single player storytelling via cut scenes and character development of a sort that doesn't work well in a multi-player setting. As many people have said, part of the big failure of "The Old Republic" was that it pretty much unfolded like a single player game with an MMO tacked on, which kind of demonstrates why Bioware has no real future with this kind of development, they are good writers and coders, but this isn't to their strengths. We can pretty much assume Bioware is slated for execution right now, and is walking down the aisle, no matter what EA might be telling them, how long does everyone think they have before someone flips the switch and has 'ol sparky put them out of their post-EA misery? I'm guessing about a year. I imagine that with the work already done they will be kept around until DA3 is finished, and then no matter how it does... zzzzap, following by some of their key personell being transferred to other EA run studios while others are given their walking papers. They just do not fit in with what EA says it's current plans are.
 

piinyouri

New member
Mar 18, 2012
2,708
0
0
So we're only getting sequels with online requirements, online passes, and forced multiplayer for the next 12 months if the last two EA articles are combined.



It is indeed the end of days.
 

alik44

New member
Sep 11, 2010
630
0
0
Great more games that are built as single player games having tacked on multi-player with micro transactions that are nothing more than a clear cash grab to take your money...... well at least EA is honest about it...somewhat
 

GameMaNiAC

New member
Sep 8, 2010
599
0
0
Callate said:
Gizzat- Phrrm- Iggidibah?

Wow... PopCap and Bioware have got to love this...

So, is there any way to buy negative EA games, short of illegal activity?...
I'd say it's justified even if it was illegal.

Let's add that to the list, shall we?

Most common piracy excuses:
- I don't have enough money.
- I wouldn't have bought the game anyway.
- It has no demo.

And now,

- It's EA's game. Fuck those assholes.


OT: I think you can assume how I feel about them from what I wrote above.

I also do not condone piracy. I'm mad at EA.
 

Myndnix

New member
Aug 11, 2012
313
0
0
No big loss to me, I never really played EA games anyway, outside of the occasional Bioware title.
I am however glad to see so many other people who care as little about multiplayer as I do.
 

Rutskarn

New member
Feb 20, 2010
243
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
EA Turns Its Back on Single-Player Games

To be fair to EA, that doesn't mean it's abandoning single-player...
Okay, come on. I get that headlines need to grab attention, but that's silly and sensationalist.
 

duchaked

New member
Dec 25, 2008
4,451
0
0
well...now I'm siding with the "screw EA" folk I guess lol...

I mean I don't even mind games with co-op, but these days it's rarely split-screen and rather online co-op cuz then ppl'd have to buy 2 copies to do that...and no, not gonna happen! keeping things simple haha
 

sunsetspawn

New member
Jul 25, 2009
210
0
0
GameMaNiAC said:
Callate said:
Gizzat- Phrrm- Iggidibah?

Wow... PopCap and Bioware have got to love this...

So, is there any way to buy negative EA games, short of illegal activity?...
I'd say it's justified even if it was illegal.

Let's add that to the list, shall we?

Most common piracy excuses:
- I don't have enough money.
- I wouldn't have bought the game anyway.
- It has no demo.

And now,

- It's EA's game. Fuck those assholes.
You know, it's possible that playing the game pirated and cracked will be the only way to get around the always online nonsense. So it would be more than just a fuck you to EA, it would actually be a more convenient way to play.

Consider that with Mass Effect 3 the only way to get the best ending, before the EC DLC, without additional bullshit, was to hack the game and change some of the values of the war assets.

Just pointing out the obvious.
 

acosn

New member
Sep 11, 2008
616
0
0
Single player games don't hold consumer interest for economic reasons like multiplayer games do.


As a company like EA who's constantly running into economic bombs and keeps getting itself into the newspaper for being an ass to employees and customers, yeah. They're going to say that they prefer multiplayer experiences.


They're a corporation. They want to make money.
 

Rooster Cogburn

New member
May 24, 2008
1,637
0
0
CriticKitten said:
And our point is "no, no you really DON'T have to have a social experience in every game you play". Video games are not exactly my intended medium for socializing with other people, rather, they are my way of avoiding social contact more often than not. Just like some people will go read books alone. Imagine if someone only allowed you to buy their next book in a digital format, and you could only access it via a direct connection through their servers, and you're thrust into a chat room while you read so that people's comments are constantly popping up as you try to read the book. Would it be irrational to complain about that? I don't think so. If I want to read a book, chances are that I don't want people bothering me while I do it. If I buy a single player game, chances are that I generally don't want a social experience out of that game....otherwise I would buy a multiplayer game of similar design. Savvy?
I would only add that I think you give the guy way too much credit. I think he is telling a transparent lie. I don't believe for one second that EA is taking this route because of their desire to make good games, or that anyone at EA believes that. They're taking this route because fuck gamers- money. I didn't expect anything else, but that does not make it OK and it is no excuse for insulting my intelligence as consumer.
 

DrunkOnEstus

In the name of Harman...
May 11, 2012
1,712
0
0
Deviate said:
Folji said:
The Fonsz said:
Folji said:
The Fonsz said:
Ea is definetely doin the right thing here THERE AWSOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Single Player is for ppl with no lives that hav no freinds.
Shouldn't you be moaning and mourning, then?
Ever heard of a joke? Wait no, ur on the internet and ur wayyyyyyyyyyy to serious for me.
I have heard of jokes, that was a joke I wrote to you.

And you thought I was being serious!
I had assumed there would always be single-player experiences, that they're in inherent part of the whole thing, but the world is changing rapidly. I mean, if you can connect to the universe with a quad-core thing-in-your-pocket, maybe connectivity to everything is the new normal?

 

joshthor

New member
Aug 18, 2009
1,274
0
0
EA you are so goddamn stupid. go to your room and think about what you have done.
 

Jingle Fett

New member
Sep 13, 2011
379
0
0
Words cannot describe the number of lols I got out of this

They are so proud that they are going to do precisely what everybody hates. First KOTOR MMO fails to take down WoW, ME3 pisses off the fans with crappy ending, bastardizing DS3 into only the most generic game ever in order to have "a broader audience" and now they're going to drop single player in favor of "what kids like these days".

Seriously, this is like the funniest thing ever. It's like they're in a bubble completely oblivious to the outside world. It's like a cartoon character walking on ice and thinking putting on banana peels instead of ice skates is a genius idea. I used to think they were evil but now I honestly think they're just...genuinely clueless...