The moment a company becomes more interested in pleasing its stockholders than with pleasing its fanbase is the day I write said company off as a lost cause. Bye Bioware, its been nice knowing you.
The reason they're worried is because BioWare had specifically said earlier that they wanted to tap into Call of Duty's fanbase. (RP fan who hasn't really gotten into Mass Effect yet here). BTW, how are they acting entitled...?immovablemover said:It seems like everyone is overlooking this, instead deciding to rage about an imaginary removal of more RPG elements even though The dev's have specifically stated that more are being put back in (compared to ME2).It's important to remember, however, that this was a comment intended for investors, not gamers, so is undoubtedly lacking in context and detail.
EA has gone to a conference for investors and said nothing other than what you would expect - "We've made this so lots of people will buy it. Your investment will bring many happy returns". I mean really, this is news? What are you expecting them to go in and say?
Also, There's no indications that this "Appealing to a broader market" means they're going to change the information that they've already released, it looks far more likely that those changes that everyone looked pretty happy about yesterday were actually PART of the "Appealing to a broader market" strategy.
You're getting worked up about nothing and, once again, RPG fanboi's are showing themselves to be the most annoying, entitled and whiny members of the gaming community.
I find it rather charming how two opposing viewpoints in the Escapists forums so quickly turn into criticism of someone's personal qualities, be they memory banks, gameplay skills or Idonlikeyerface ;-)OutrageousEmu said:So you cannot think of a single instance of people adding a feature and something becoming more popular, which is exactly what thats saying? I think that says more about your memory than it does about mankind.
Took the words right out of my mouth.Traun said:Now you see, this is getting harder and harder to believe.Logan Westbrook said:BioWare's Casey Hudson may have previously stated [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/109207-BioWare-Mass-Effect-3-Combat-Perfected] that the combat in Mass Effect 3 would be the best in the series, but that doesn't automatically mean that it will come at the expense of the RPG side.
Kind of you to put "loathsome action" (when referring to online comments) and "hyperbole" in the same sentence. Saves me the time ;-)OutrageousEmu said:I find hyperbole for the sake of negativity to be a thoroughly unpleasant action. Hyperbole to the point of blatantly misrepresenting nature being even more of a loathsome action.
So the fact that Bioware said they were bringing RPG elements back to please the core fans, then EA putting on the brakes, delaying the game, and citing to investors that they were broadening the the appeal of the game doesn't raise a red flag to you? It very much seems like Bioware wanted to go one way, but the EA overlords slapped them on the nose with a newspaper and said "Bad doggy."immovablemover said:It seems like everyone is overlooking this, instead deciding to rage about an imaginary removal of more RPG elements even though The dev's have specifically stated that more are being put back in (compared to ME2).It's important to remember, however, that this was a comment intended for investors, not gamers, so is undoubtedly lacking in context and detail.
EA has gone to a conference for investors and said nothing other than what you would expect - "We've made this so lots of people will buy it. Your investment will bring many happy returns". I mean really, this is news? What are you expecting them to go in and say?
Also, There's no indications that this "Appealing to a broader market" means they're going to change the information that they've already released, it looks far more likely that those changes that everyone looked pretty happy about yesterday were actually PART of the "Appealing to a broader market" strategy.
You're getting worked up about nothing and, once again, RPG fanboi's are showing themselves to be the most annoying, entitled and whiny members of the gaming community.
This.Art Axiv said:They are busy "Dragon Age 2-fying" it.
I respect you for this, and agree completely.immovablemover said:You're getting worked up about nothing and, once again, RPG fanboi's are showing themselves to be the most annoying, entitled and whiny members of the gaming community.
Sorry to correct you, but I think you mean THIRD person shooterHive Mind said:Anytime someone working on the game says "shooter-meets-RPG", read it as: 'a shooter with dialog options'.
As if Mass Effect 2 wasn't dumbed down and turned into a first person shooter enough.
Nope that's not what they said. Read it again.Traun said:Yeah, I mean, it's not like they've said it or anything [http://www.nowgamer.com/news/5141/bioware-we-want-call-of-dutys-audience]MustardTiger said:I'm all for change, really, but I seriously hope that it doesn't mean they're trying to Call of Duty-ize the game to get others to buy it.
From what I've read, it means you will be able to partake in more actions that belong in the genre of third person Shooters like rolling out the way and such.JUMBO PALACE said:Took the words right out of my mouth.Traun said:Now you see, this is getting harder and harder to believe.Logan Westbrook said:BioWare's Casey Hudson may have previously stated [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/109207-BioWare-Mass-Effect-3-Combat-Perfected] that the combat in Mass Effect 3 would be the best in the series, but that doesn't automatically mean that it will come at the expense of the RPG side.