animehermit said:
It's not really shoehorning if these people are already part of Avengers lore.
It's shoehorning if you're trying to cram a character into an already-packed movie solely for reasons that have everything to do with pretenses to political-correctness and nothing to do with improving the movie. It is not a given that "diversifying the main cast" would do that. It's not even likely that doing so, with the available options, would so much as break even in the quality department.
Whether or not you want it to happen, there are heroes being added to the roster, with Ant-Man coming up, as well as talks about Dr. Strange.
Given that we're talking about Bob's problem with the "whiteness" of the cast in THIS movie, talking about casting the next one is a bit disingenuous. Either there's a race problem with the existing movie, or there isn't.
Bob and I, weren't calling for these heroes to replace the ones in the film, but to add to them.
For God's sake, WHERE?! There's noplace you could cram them into the film that wouldn't be a mere cameo or swapping out a supporting cast member (and I'm sure no one wants to see Luke Cage be the supporting cast member Loki offs).
Red Tails is a historical drama about a black squadron of WWII pilots. Casting anyone other than African Americans would be an insult to memory of those pilots.
Perhaps you didn't notice, but the flick was filmed in much the same style as 1970's "blaxploitation" films, right down to the "3D"-block-letter title credits and overblown music slapped over the opening scene and dialogue. The script might as well have been following a checklist cobbled together in committee, and I could not believe that it was being directed by the same man who helped Lucas direct "Star Wars", it was so lackluster.
Despite some great acting and CGI that was for the most part exceptional, it WAS an insult to the men who served and died, preying on newfound sentimentality and respect to chunk out as slapdash production for a few quick bucks while the Tuskeegee iron was briefly hot.
But let's get back to the meat of the matter: YOUR argument is that a film about a superteam, which itself is the culmination of about a half-dozen other films establishing the origins of the members OF that superteam, is lacking because all of the members picked for movie treatment came from the Avengers A-list --- and none of them happened to be something other than Caucasian.
It is EXACTLY the same as griping about "Red Tails" having nothing but black pilots in it. You are demanding B-listers replace A-listers as major (not supporting, not cameo) figures, without any idea of how they would actually have been worked in, for no better reason than being offended by a fictional character's skin color.
1) He wasn't black in Norse mythology. Easy answer to this one, it's not really based on Norse mythology.
Actually, the whole point made in the movie "Thor" was that Norse mythology was based ON the Asgardians coming to Earth in the first place.
The movie, "Avengers", also worked very well. It was not made worse by the lack of Luke Cage, Black Panther, or Spider-Woman.
I wouldn't cast a white person into a slavery biopic as a slave.
And I wouldn't cast a comic-book character who's a white man as a black man, OR vice versa. It doesn't become any less racist or offensive when the objective is the same damned thing.