You have some of the lowest tier posts. Mostly because you misunderstand the Socratic method.I am always sincere. I do use the Socratic method, if that's what you mean by 'coy leading questions', and I won't stop doing that.
You have some of the lowest tier posts. Mostly because you misunderstand the Socratic method.I am always sincere. I do use the Socratic method, if that's what you mean by 'coy leading questions', and I won't stop doing that.
Can you show some examples?You have some of the lowest tier posts. Mostly because you misunderstand the Socratic method.
...What do I think about the way I present myself? I think you forgot to finish the end of your thought.I think you all just genuinely do not get that Houseman legit seriously thinks the way he presents himself, with some occasional exceptions that are indistinguishable from the actual Houseman shit.
You know what, I'll let you in on something: at the end of the day, the only person I post on here for is me. I post jokes/references and such that make me laugh (this is why about 90% of it involves It's Always Sunny in some way).What do you think he means with his post?
Noted.It's hard to tell, because lots of people on this forum have the bad habit of pretending that this is Twitter and only post one-liners or meme images
So it seems like you're just the last person in a long line of people who have accused me of things without being able to back it upYou know what, I'll let you in on something: at the end of the day, the only person I post on here for is me. I post jokes/references and such that make me laugh (this is why about 90% of it involves It's Always Sunny in some way).
Also;
Noted.
No, as in you think in a manner that aligns with your presentation. You are intensely genuine....What do I think about the way I present myself? I think you forgot to finish the end of your thought.
Hey, @crimson5pheonix you liked his post, so do you understand what he's trying to say?
Thank you.No, as in you think in a manner that aligns with your presentation. You are intensely genuine.
without being able to back it up
I figured "I just had a laugh" would have been enough, but since you seem to want an accusation so bad (and to spoil your little victory lap), I may as well oblige you as a thanks for the genuine merriment you have brought me the past couple days; it is only "civil" in the fact you didn't name call or drop f-bombs, however it is still very rude, condescending and a bit insulting...you know, kind of like posting "Waaaaaaaa".If you could hum better, that would probably help a lot. Start by learning how to properly breathe so that you don't have to audibly gasp like a fish out of water.
What makes you think so?however it is still very rude, condescending and a bit insulting.
The thing is, the Socratic method is supposed to be a cooperative endeavour, involving the other participant on the same footing.I am always sincere. I do use the Socratic method, if that's what you mean by 'coy leading questions', and I won't stop doing that.
No it's just he's setting up one hell of a PR campaign to launch Trump TV from lol Claim he was cheated and his network will tell the real stories and then boom gets people in the door lol(reads thread)
god damn it guys
anyway
it looks like Biden definitively won Georgia.
In other news
At this point, I don't even think he's trying to win. He is trying to illegitimate the election. If he can flip Pennsylvania or Michigan he will "prove fraud" accusations to his supporters. he's thinking that's what this will give him power
Is that what Wikipedia told you, seeing how "cooperative" is one of the first words in of the article? And then you just took that and ran along that train of thought, which brought you to the conclusion that the participants must be on the same footing? Because that's what it sounds like. And no, these are not socratic questions, they are rhetorical, but you're free to deny that this is what you did, regardless.The thing is, the Socratic method is supposed to be a cooperative endeavour, involving the other participant on the same footing.
So, Socratic questioning, then. Socrates was an asshole.What I see is perhaps dressed up as Socratic questioning, but rather seems aimed towards aggravation or condescension.
I find it highly offensive that you would compare history's first great shitposter to a low grade and stale internet troll.Perhaps we can call it the "Diogenic method".
This... this is a joke, right?What makes you think so?
I don’t understand. Doesn’t Giuliani look like this normally?Guys, seriously, stay on topic or I will take away five(!!!!!) Good Boy Points from each of you and cancel the pizza party, and no one wants that.
Now back to the topic: I think Tali'Zora is a better waifu than Liar--err I mean did anyone see Giuliani melting from his head today? It looked like paint was leaking from his ears, and he's the guy Trump is paying to over-throw the Democracy?
Not trying to knock the Socratic method or anything but.... how did he die? Because ‘aggressive‘ defeated Socrates hence why it wins hereThe thing is, the Socratic method is supposed to be a cooperative endeavour, involving the other participant on the same footing.
What I see is perhaps dressed up as Socratic questioning, but rather seems aimed towards aggravation or condescension. Perhaps we can call it the "Diogenic method".