Basically what's happening to me over at Current events.What's the difference between simple agreement and "clique-ish" behaviour?
Basically what's happening to me over at Current events.What's the difference between simple agreement and "clique-ish" behaviour?
I had to look up the "proper" word. Turns out the word is cliquish, which I almost typed at first, but then deleted because it looked weird.What's the difference between simple agreement and "clique-ish" behaviour?
Certain users will only agree with certain arguments. Nobody's obligated to like yours.Certain users will only ever agree with other users.
That rings hollow seeing as how I've been on the receiving end of being called a troll (an attack against my person, allowed apparently) and thus, my arguments don't deserve to even be listened to.Certain users will only agree with certain arguments. Nobody's obligated to like yours.
I got a warning in the old forums for saying someone sounded like a troll. That person was banned a couple of months ago for, uh, being a troll. But that's neither here nor there. I can't bother with anybody arguing for Trump.That rings hollow seeing as how I've been on the receiving end of being called a troll (an attack against my person, allowed apparently) and thus, my arguments don't deserve to even be listened to.
And there's the proof of "Certain users will only ever agree with other users."I can't bother with anybody arguing for Trump.
I mean do I give a shit about any attempted defense of Trump? No. You want to talk about movies or games? Go nuts. I don't need a button to ignore people.And there's the proof of "Certain users will only ever agree with other users."
Otherwise, you would have said "I can't bother with any arguments for Trump"
No, that's at most "proof" that one certain user will dismiss anything pro-Trump users have to say.And there's the proof of "Certain users will only ever agree with other users."
Otherwise, you would have said "I can't bother with any arguments for Trump"
Well not anything. I will talk to anyone about Batman, Cowboy Bebop, Sopranos or Twin Peaks.No, that's at most "proof" that one certain user will dismiss anything pro-Trump users have to say.
I didn't think Hank could get any more serious about Propane and Propane Accessories but it seems I've been proven wrong.View attachment 1379
Are you sure you're ready?
"See you, king of the hill".I didn't think Hank could get any more serious about Propane and Propane Accessories but it seems I've been proven wrong.
It seems you are not fond of people criticizing you. So when criticism is warranted you can either have:Neither. Both are evidence of clique-ish behavior.
Why are those the only choices?
I think there's more to a clique than that. I think a key aspect of a clique is generally that it is insular and exclusionary - like a club where you have to win membership. There's perhaps an implication that people don't think independently, they're following an official line.Cliquish behavior is not one act, it is a pattern of action.
Assuming that the criticism is actually criticism, and not just some kind of personal attack in lieu of engaging with an argument that they disagree with...It seems you are not fond of people criticizing you. So when criticism is warranted you can either have:
1. one criticism that other people identify they support or
2. everyone criticizes you seperately
Because when you say its 'clique behavior' it comes off as 'I dont like more than 1 person criticizing me at a time.'
It's not as bad as reddit, though.Assuming that the criticism is actually criticism, and not just some kind of personal attack in lieu of engaging with an argument that they disagree with...
Assuming these premises, I would rather have everybody criticize me separately, that way I know they're putting in some actual effort to draft a post, as opposed to just clicking a button.
It's kind of like the followers of a stereotypical bully in cartoons that just follow around the main bully and go "yeah, what he said!"
That's what "likes" are like, in this context.
I think there's more to a clique than that. I think a key aspect of a clique is generally that it is insular and exclusionary - like a club where you have to win membership. There's perhaps an implication that people don't think independently, they're following an official line.
I don't think anything much like that exists on these forums. People just agree with others to a lesser or greater degree.
You are right, it is not.It's not as bad as reddit, though.