Awwww... Well, we'll always have that impressive Double Turkey, EA. See you next time. Try not to get a swelled head from this.
As a matter of fact, EA paid very close attention to the fact that they won two years in a row, citing this specific poll as one of the reason as to why they got rid of the Online Pass. That's a significant change for them, and a significant consequence of this poll.EternallyBored said:Honestly, at this point, the only people who ever cared about this contest were the Consumerist audience, and the gaming community after EA won the first time.
Ah, I actually didn't even know about that, I mostly just remember them blaming homophobes for their win last year, but this is a good point.RJ 17 said:As a matter of fact, EA paid very close attention to the fact that they won two years in a row, citing this specific poll as one of the reason as to why they got rid of the Online Pass. That's a significant change for them, and a significant consequence of this poll.EternallyBored said:Honestly, at this point, the only people who ever cared about this contest were the Consumerist audience, and the gaming community after EA won the first time.
This.mysecondlife said:How about instead of making several quality developers into losers in March Madness or w/e you guys have, you vote for the worst video game developers of the year?
Because I'd be totally down for that.
Well, except for the past 2 years where they were the worst.Redlin5 said:Set the bar that low and you'll be happy every time.Andy Chalk said:Peter Moore will no doubt be happy about it, even if the result is less "we can do better" and more "somebody else can do worse."
Which is why I consider this poll to be garbage. For EA to be considered the Worst Company in America over, say, the Bank of America is really showing a lack of priorities.The Cheshire said:Isn't it sad that videogame and TV companies get voted the worse while some corporations are just plain destroying the planet? Monsanto should win every bloody year.
Exactly. EA are fucking terrible as a video game publisher. But in a world full of companies that steal billions of dollars, deliberately ruin the environment, and even deliberately kill millions of people, I'm not convinced "Makes some bad games" is really enough to qualify as the worst company ever.schrodinger said:Now how about people actually vote for companies that, oh i don't know, ruins lives, other businesses, the environment, the economy, have horrible business practices, just terrible companies all around.
Or, more then likely, most people are aware that even though EA is a horrible company, there are worse companies out their.Sofus said:EA has alot of money.. I mean it would have been impossible for them to use so much money on all the garbage games we have seen them publish over the years. My guess is that EA stopped lighting cigars with 100 dollar bills and instead used that surplus of cash to ensure that it would be impossible for them to win a third poo.