Hope noone else has already told you, but if someone has; Sorry for bugging you.Nile McMorrow said:Scrub Cannon? What on earth is that?
o_0 The Strawberry Shortcake people sued Penny Arcade?!Grey Carter said:Technically we're covered under the fair use doctrine on account of our work generally being parody. That wouldn't stop people from trying to sue us though, and if they did we wouldn't have the money to fight back. Really, the reason we don't get any legal threats or anything is because we're very small fish in a very large pond. The more popular you get, the bigger a target you become. See Penny Arcade and Strawberry Shortcake for an example of that.Scorpid said:Well I know you guys wouldn't put out a comic that would get you sued, but it just dawned on me, between all the characters you use from popular games like Kratos and Zelda why aren't you being in danger of being sued?
Susan Arendt said:Wow. The amount of overreacting in this thread is fascinating.
*gets popcorn*
What do you think the bigger factor is in this drama explosin? Hobbes, or COD?MiracleOfSound said:Never have I seen so many drama queens all getting their underpants twisted in one thread over something so trivial.
As evil as BlopsII is, it's tame compared to the holocaust of elitist bitching and blaming in League of Legends.canadamus_prime said:Black Ops II corrupts absolutely.
EDIT: Correction: XBOX Live corrupts absolutely.
Apparently sportsmanship is a concept that's lost on most online gamers.Atmos Duality said:As evil as BlopsII is, it's tame compared to the holocaust of elitist bitching and blaming in League of Legends.canadamus_prime said:Black Ops II corrupts absolutely.
EDIT: Correction: XBOX Live corrupts absolutely.
Aye, and what's scary, is that I can actually see the appeal in blaming someone else in the heat of the moment.canadamus_prime said:Apparently sportsmanship is a concept that's lost on most online gamers.
What I really have to shake my head at is when people make excuses as to why they lost. "Oh that character's overpowered", "HAX", "fucker campers," that sort of thing. If you (generic) were really had any skill worth mentioning you wouldn't have to make excuses as to why you lost. One thing's for sure, no one ever makes excuses for why they won. You don't hear the winners complaining about hax or overpowered characters or campers or whatever. It's only the losers who can't accept the fact that there just might be someone better than them. And that's what makes them truly losers in my mind.Atmos Duality said:Aye, and what's scary, is that I can actually see the appeal in blaming someone else in the heat of the moment.canadamus_prime said:Apparently sportsmanship is a concept that's lost on most online gamers.
Especially for any team game where the team composition and performance REALLY matters.
I try my best not to, because getting pissed hampers ones judgment, and the problem just snowballs out of control when everyone on your team starts doing it.
I was listening to a conversation on Live (I find them grimly amusing) where one guy claimed that raging, and bellowing obscenities is part of the "COD experience," and when I think about it, I kind of agree with him. It's probably part of why I enjoy the series, no matter how broken its various installments get (and BLOPSII is very broken), playing it with friends is basically an evening of beer, gaming and creative expletives.Atmos Duality said:Aye, and what's scary, is that I can actually see the appeal in blaming someone else in the heat of the moment.canadamus_prime said:Apparently sportsmanship is a concept that's lost on most online gamers.
Especially for any team game where the team composition and performance REALLY matters.
I try my best not to, because getting pissed hampers ones judgment, and the problem just snowballs out of control when everyone on your team starts doing it.
They threatened legal action if Penny Arcade didn't remove a strip. Fun for everybody.Imp Emissary said:o_0 The Strawberry Shortcake people sued Penny Arcade?!Grey Carter said:Technically we're covered under the fair use doctrine on account of our work generally being parody. That wouldn't stop people from trying to sue us though, and if they did we wouldn't have the money to fight back. Really, the reason we don't get any legal threats or anything is because we're very small fish in a very large pond. The more popular you get, the bigger a target you become. See Penny Arcade and Strawberry Shortcake for an example of that.Scorpid said:Well I know you guys wouldn't put out a comic that would get you sued, but it just dawned on me, between all the characters you use from popular games like Kratos and Zelda why aren't you being in danger of being sued?
>_> Hmmm...
I guess it's what you're looking for in an evening.Grey Carter said:I was listening to a conversation on Live (I find them grimly amusing) where one guy claimed that raging, and bellowing obscenities is part of the "COD experience," and when I think about it, I kind of agree with him. It's probably part of why I enjoy the series, no matter how broken its various installments get (and BLOPSII is very broken), playing it with friends is basically an evening of beer, gaming and creative expletives.
When I get lagged out, I blame my ISP, not the person who is winning (and having lived with 56k up until 2009, yes, that was a common occurrence). It's the net. Shit breaks, it lags. It's not infallible.canadamus_prime said:What I really have to shake my head at is when people make excuses as to why they lost. "Oh that character's overpowered", "HAX", "fucker campers," that sort of thing. If you (generic) were really had any skill worth mentioning you wouldn't have to make excuses as to why you lost. One thing's for sure, no one ever makes excuses for why they won. You don't hear the winners complaining about hax or overpowered characters or campers or whatever. It's only the losers who can't accept the fact that there just might be someone better than them. And that's what makes them truly losers in my mind.
Well that's legitimately something that's beyond your control, isn't it? Although I don't think bitching about it is going to change anything.Atmos Duality said:When I get lagged out, I blame my ISP, not the person who is winning (and having lived with 56k up until 2009, yes, that was a common occurrence). It's the net. Shit breaks, it lags. It's not infallible.canadamus_prime said:What I really have to shake my head at is when people make excuses as to why they lost. "Oh that character's overpowered", "HAX", "fucker campers," that sort of thing. If you (generic) were really had any skill worth mentioning you wouldn't have to make excuses as to why you lost. One thing's for sure, no one ever makes excuses for why they won. You don't hear the winners complaining about hax or overpowered characters or campers or whatever. It's only the losers who can't accept the fact that there just might be someone better than them. And that's what makes them truly losers in my mind.
Then perhaps one should find a way to counter the "dominant strategies" instead of whining about them. Because whining about them just makes one look like a sore loser.As for "cheap strategies", I can see anyone getting bored with them after a time (a lazy victory feels hollow), but if you're playing to win, identifying the dominant strategy is in fact, playing the game as intended. So anyone bringing "skill" into the argument is already shooting themselves in the foot.
Ha ha ha. Fun read.Grey Carter said:They threatened legal action if Penny Arcade didn't remove a strip. Fun for everybody.Imp Emissary said:o_0 The Strawberry Shortcake people sued Penny Arcade?!Grey Carter said:Technically we're covered under the fair use doctrine on account of our work generally being parody. That wouldn't stop people from trying to sue us though, and if they did we wouldn't have the money to fight back. Really, the reason we don't get any legal threats or anything is because we're very small fish in a very large pond. The more popular you get, the bigger a target you become. See Penny Arcade and Strawberry Shortcake for an example of that.Scorpid said:Well I know you guys wouldn't put out a comic that would get you sued, but it just dawned on me, between all the characters you use from popular games like Kratos and Zelda why aren't you being in danger of being sued?
>_> Hmmm...
I have to agree with this. Firstly, Calvin and Hobbes was well known for fairly deep humour at times which, I fear, these strips aren't going to reach that standard.Krantos said:No.
No, No No No No.
See this is the problem I always have with people "Revisiting" classic cartoons. They always feel they have to make it darker. Like having Charlie Brown kill Lucy for pulling the ball away. Or Calvin's parents putting him on anti-psychotics.
The old strips' innocence is what made them good. Well, C&H was also good because of the way Calvin and Hobbes would tackle existential questions, but that's another story.
People using the characters like this is just stupid. It's basically saying "hurr, hurr, Hobbes is Swearing!"
The only time I've seen classic characters used well were those Bacon and Hobbes strips.
These Erin and Hobbes strips come across as the writers just saying "Hey LOOK! We're Using characters from another cartoon! Like Us because you like them! Do you like us yet?"
...then again, that's kind of what Crit Miss has been doing ever since Erin's hallucinations started. hmm...
You mean WARNING.SpiderJerusalem said:Almost as fascinating as the Escapist handing out warnings over people criticizing the comic strip.Susan Arendt said:Wow. The amount of overreacting in this thread is fascinating.
*gets popcorn*