Glomping Erin seems like a dangerous idea.fix-the-spade said:Hobbes still hasn't tackled anyone...
Maybe it's a cannon that fires...I dunno...soaked sponges?Nile McMorrow said:Scrub Cannon? What on earth is that?
'canadamus_prime said:Black Ops II corrupts absolutely.
EDIT: Correction: XBOX Live corrupts absolutely.
Hobbes is a tiger, your argument is invalid.Zachary Amaranth said:Glomping Erin seems like a dangerous idea.
Let me soothe your wounds. Warning: Good luck leaving this site: www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/2007/01/01snekadid said:'canadamus_prime said:Black Ops II corrupts absolutely.
EDIT: Correction: XBOX Live corrupts absolutely.
I was going to correct you but you caught yourself
I miss calvin and hobbes now... thanks alot guys for opening up old wounds! /cry
Yeah, tell me about it...Daystar Clarion said:Pfft, everyone knows that plush tigers can't snipe for shit.
[HEADING=1]lrn top ply noob!!11one[/HEADING]
Krantos said:No.
No, No No No No.
See this is the problem I always have with people "Revisiting" classic cartoons. They always feel they have to make it darker. Like having Charlie Brown kill Lucy for pulling the ball away. Or Calvin's parents putting him on anti-psychotics.
The old strips' innocence is what made them good. Well, C&H was also good because of the way Calvin and Hobbes would tackle existential questions, but that's another story.
People using the characters like this is just stupid. It's basically saying "hurr, hurr, Hobbes is Swearing!"
The only time I've seen classic characters used well were those Bacon and Hobbes strips.
These Erin and Hobbes strips come across as the writers just saying "Hey LOOK! We're Using characters from another cartoon! Like Us because you like them! Do you like us yet?"
...then again, that's kind of what Crit Miss has been doing ever since Erin's hallucinations started. hmm...
SpiderJerusalem said:Agreed wholeheartedly.Krantos said:No.
No, No No No No.
See this is the problem I always have with people "Revisiting" classic cartoons. They always feel they have to make it darker. Like having Charlie Brown kill Lucy for pulling the ball away. Or Calvin's parents putting him on anti-psychotics.
The old strips' innocence is what made them good. Well, C&H was also good because of the way Calvin and Hobbes would tackle existential questions, but that's another story.
People using the characters like this is just stupid. It's basically saying "hurr, hurr, Hobbes is Swearing!"
The only time I've seen classic characters used well were those Bacon and Hobbes strips.
These Erin and Hobbes strips come across as the writers just saying "Hey LOOK! We're Using characters from another cartoon! Like Us because you like them! Do you like us yet?"
This smacks of laziness. The same kind of inane garbage that Waterson has spoken against in regards why he never licensed Calvin and Hobbes anywhere. This, if anything, is validation of his point.
Krantos said:snip
Nooners said:snip
SpiderJerusalem said:snip