I really wish I could've thought of saying this somehow. I kept wandering back and forth in this thread thinking about what would make sense when bringing up that the movie isn't a piece about consequence, but you pretty much "ten steps ahead'd" the whole thing.sageoftruth said:Before you reach for your ticket money, remember that this movie makes no attempts to criticize the things the characters do. That will be your job. As Bob said, young teenagers will probably watch this and come out thinking, "Wow! Those characters are awesome. I wish I was like that." It's pretty heavy stuff if you're disillusioned with this mindset, and you will probably leave feeling depressed and disappointed with society. My main point is, you probably shouldn't go to see this if you're looking to enjoy the experience.
Like a number of art films (particularly Melancholia for me, ugh!) the objective is to make you ponder rather than to make you feel good. Honestly, like most modern art, I'm not sure if there's really a way to set this apart from the movies that genuinely do try to cash in on teenage naivety, since the main difference is whatever the director was thinking when he made it.
Always beware the dreaded Poe's Law.OlasDAlmighty said:Were actually I being serious I don't see how it'd make me any more ridiculous than all the people with the exact opposite reaction. Honestly I have no interest in this movie, ponies or no ponies.snowfi6916 said:So, you're gonna not watch a movie simply because it probably makes ONE reference to the show?OlasDAlmighty said:Wait, IT HAS POINIES?!?!
Definitely avoiding then.
Get over yourself.
Wow! Thanks. I was already having doubts about labeling it as an art film. Much appreciated.Ferisar said:I really wish I could've thought of saying this somehow. I kept wandering back and forth in this thread thinking about what would make sense when bringing up that the movie isn't a piece about consequence, but you pretty much "ten steps ahead'd" the whole thing.sageoftruth said:Before you reach for your ticket money, remember that this movie makes no attempts to criticize the things the characters do. That will be your job. As Bob said, young teenagers will probably watch this and come out thinking, "Wow! Those characters are awesome. I wish I was like that." It's pretty heavy stuff if you're disillusioned with this mindset, and you will probably leave feeling depressed and disappointed with society. My main point is, you probably shouldn't go to see this if you're looking to enjoy the experience.
Like a number of art films (particularly Melancholia for me, ugh!) the objective is to make you ponder rather than to make you feel good. Honestly, like most modern art, I'm not sure if there's really a way to set this apart from the movies that genuinely do try to cash in on teenage naivety, since the main difference is whatever the director was thinking when he made it.
Kudos.
Oh God. Even that (mostly) secondary exposure to Trash Humpers makes me want to NEVER see a Korine film.TwikTwok said:For the curious here is video exploring Harmony Korine, specifically his 2009 film: Trash Humpers.
http://blip.tv/brows-held-high/brows-held-high-trash-humpers-4678636
For anyone considering going to see Spring Breakers I urge you to watch this so you know what kind of film maker you're dealing with.
Which might very well mean that everyone loves it, for vastly varying reasons. Those mythical "generation Y" kids love it for exactly what they perceive it is: a movie about barely-legals on spring break, while the slightly older audience likes it for its social commentary.Urh said:Even if this movie has as much substance and depth as Bob says it does, I suspect that it will go right over the heads of most of the movie's target audience.