Going to have to snip out some things here and there, mostly second or third-level quotes. Otherwise this is going to be longer than the full review I posted earlier up the page.
lightspeed said:
lightspeed said:
Why i watched this review i do not know considering moviebob hated it before he went to see it as he slagged it off in his previous reviews. Moviebob it is now apparently clear you know nothing about movies.
Natsu_Blaze said:
So, why did you? And why are you now commenting on said review?
Because i was curious and thought it would start raining pigs and moviebob would review the movie to a good standard
I stand by my earlier statements that Moviebob created an argument with reasons behind it to support his opinions. I've listed just a few of the points a few pages back. An exercise, if you will: Go look at it, and pretend that I've just told you that a new movie came out, and these things were wrong with it. Based solely on that information, would you think it would be reasonable to conclude that the movie in question sucked?
Also, people like you who wander onto videos they know they aren't going to like and then comment on them calling them shit or what-not are prevalent on Youtube. We like to call them "trolls".
For starters wazoo is not a word come on use a big boy word like arse. Like i stated before it was a simple movie nothing special and it was not supposed to be so you cannot blame it for not being complicated and deep. "moviebob and i" are you a tag team because i did not realise you wrote some of the script of this review :O
Oh, stop being so immature. I said "Moviebob and I" because he has argued it in his main review and in his comments here, and I have similarly argued it here. In other words we both have made the same argument.
And I can say wazoo if I want. Wazoo is a funny word and everyone knows what it means. Swearing was invented to express extreme emotion; it loses its meaning if people wander around saying "mother****er" in every sentence like they want to be Fifty Cent. (Another reason why I hate the Twins right there.)
The plot sucked. Next question.
It did not suck it was simple and sometimes when people need to relax a simple plot is nicer to follow than one about nuclear fission.
I'm not asking for the next Farewell to Arms here, but the plot spends two-thirds of the time focused on Sam and the rest of the trivial human cast, doing things that have NO relevance to the movie whatsoever. In addition, every time the humans are onscreen, the plot becomes a bunch of stitched-together cliches. I could predict pretty much every point of interaction between Sam and Mikaela: the "say you love me" subplot nobody cared about, her walking in on the human Decepticon (there's another plothole for ya; where'd she go?) while she's forcing Sam into a kiss, the inevitable "Sam goes to a frat party and is nearly unfaithful" thing (at least Bumblebee was funny in that scene)... I could go on, but I think I've made my point. The only time it got interesting was when backstory showed up, things like the Primes or the Matrix of Leadership.
Worse than the cliches, though, or the humans hogging all the plot, were the gaping plotholes all over the place. I've already gone over that in detail; if you want to know more look up the page for the full review I did an hour after seeing the movie myself.
-quote from Moviebob snipped-
It's not about there being action in an action movie. It's about the action in this action movie being terrible.
I have a perfectly good pair of ears on the side of my head and their not just there to provide support for my sunglasses, i heard every word of moviebob's review down to the last sickening accented word. Now ask yourself what is the aim of every movie. To give enjoyment to the viewer through immersion (plus to make heaps of money) and the more realistic the more likely you will be immersed. So how will it feel if there were missiles, giant robots and explosions? Hmmmm i think you would not be able to make out what was going on, so it sets you in the moment like you are actually there. All the action scenes that where worth seeing every bit in great detail were the smaller fight scenes e.g. the forest battle. If you rate bad action down to the fact you were too slow to make out every detail then you are a retard no question!
Sure, I wouldn't actually be able to see much if I was actually there. But I don't want to see it as if I were actually there, I want to see the fight or the scene's not worth it. I mean, the Bumblebee fight was absolutely awesome, but I could only see three events (two of them in super slow-mo) because the rest of the fight was obscured by motion blur. That's not good screenplay right there.
This is an action movie. If the Rule of Cool can apply, pick that over hyper-realism.
Have you EVER seen a Transformers cartoon? This is a story about the Transformers. Making the humans take center stage is a stupid, terrible idea that makes it into just Random Alien Invasion Action Flick #2453.
And he explained the relatability thing. Both in the review and in comments. The Transformers are completely capable of making the story relatable on their own. They speak, they have faces (this is mostly paraphrasing Moviebob here), they have emotions. They have personalities.
Allow me to put this simply; you must have HATED Wall-E, since you can't relate to a robot.
This part made me lol hard first thing i have never seen Wall-E and I?m sure it was good second i can relate to the transformers (I?m one of those strange few that prefers aliens to predators) and i will agree with you it should have been a lot more focused on the actual transformers but movie making is a business and to sell the most tickets bay wanted it to appeal to old school fanboys and people just getting into the genre so that?s why he had to give the film a human face.
Wall-E needed no human face to appeal to people "just getting into it". People would pay good money to see a movie about a massive intergalactic war that shifted battlefields to our planet. Hell, they paid good money to see E.T., didn't they?
Okay each person?s opinion is different they may be similar at times but different. So to not experience something just because, someone?s jaded opinion of a movie butchered it for all the nitpicky faults is stupid. It shows you lack free will to think for yourself e.g. i think Yahtzee is a brilliant reviewer but he dislikes jrpgs and i like some of the FFs but i have not played one just because he dislikes them because I?m not a mindless moron who takes orders over the internet from complete strangers
. No Yahtzee does not have a patent to it but he owns the right because he came up with the unique style it?s an insult to him for stupid people with no creativity to steal it for themselves. You say the back ground gags are the only similarity? hmmm okay what about the lack of punctuation in moviebob's speech and large amount of swearing. Another question why do you think Yahtzee's review is called ZERO PUNCTUATION..... you know its beyond me but a super genius like yourself might be able to figure it out.
Again, you're talking about a film critic here. That's his JOB, to give you a review of a movie to aid in your judgement whether you want to go see it or now.
And as the poster above me has said, people talk faster when they're angry. There actually isn't a lack of punctuation at all in his review, and he swore a hell of a lot less than Yahtzee on a GOOD day. And, again taking from the previous poster, Yahtzee uses lots of images of characters to make his visual gags (himself, the imps, etc.) Moviebob, on the other hand, puts up pictures and text. That's a very big difference in style right there.
Seriously... what exactly are you claiming is similar other than the fact that they both talk fast?
I do commend you though because some of your argument does have you own thought and opinion them, but the other bits are twisted by moviebob's bazaar biest opinion. I have nothing wrong with people not liking something but there has to be a reason to this in moviebob's review he has just given why he did not like which is opinion not facts about the film. Yahtzee really tries hard to find good points and the bad ones adding his personal opinion as extra which what a good review should be
"Twisted" isn't the word for it. "Informed", perhaps. He states his opinion and gave reasons for it (again, I've said this all before and I'm not going to repeat it; go back a page if you want to know.) Reasons are based in facts. "I didn't like the robot designs." "There are plotholes in the script; what the hell happened to X Y and Z?" That's what I'm talking about when I say reasons.
More to the point, I have now seen the movie. I can confirm myself a large quantity of what Moviebob has said. I even wrote a full review of my own halfway up the page, less than an hour afterwards so it would be fresh in my mind.
"Concentrated stupid" lol you mean you tiny little brain cannot think of nothing else to type!
No, I just have very little tolerance for people saying stupid things. Like everything below this sentence, which is likewise going to be snipped. There's nothing to call saying stupid things like that except flaming.
(And no, I'm not a fanboy. I decided to get involved in the debate, so naturally when I see new posts on the subject I respond to them. That's what you do in a debate.)