TestECull said:
Yes, I would. I'm offended by those slurs just the same but that doesn't mean other people have to bend over backwards for my sake. I can ignore such things.
Yes I would what? Just some clarification, I asked a question with two scenarios.
It doesn't change what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that people need to just ignore things that they find offensive. A game developer shouldn't have to censor their box art because someone got offended by a zombie in a noose.
But
nobody has gotten offended yet. It's just Deep Silver being considerate of other's, for lack of a "manlier" word, feelings. This whole debate kind of reminds me of this [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/the-big-picture/2783-Correctitude], but take it how you will.
...So? Big fucking deal. As I said, they can just ignore the box art. Nobody is forcing them to look at it.
It's out there, it's on public display, that is my main point. To put another extreme example,
Besides, what about all the other offensive shit on public display? I could go into any shopping center in this country and point out at least five displays in every decently large store that is more offensive than Dead Island's box art could ever hope to be. Why the double standard here? Why not tell Victoria's Secret to throw some damn clothes on their advertisement models? Why not tell Chevy to stop depicting their CTS-V and Corvettes hauling ass? How about we censor every christmas compilation in the audio aisle because some people find christmas offensive?
Because Victoria's Secret ads are presented in specific places appropriate to their demographic.
Uh, Chevy and hauling ass? As in super-model ass or an ass of a workload? You'll have to elaborate on that.
Who find's Christmas offensive?
If you're going to put out comparisons, put some more relevant ones. I'm not afraid to back down on my point so long as the other one is presented well.
I'd buy a game by a dev that did this out of principle alone.
Many would not. Most wouldn't make a fuss over a slight, minor detail of a logo being changed.
Then why didn't they change the logo in game too?
Because the logo in the game
is in the game, where someone would have had to buy it already knowing its contents.
I don't think either of use are going to "get" the other person's stance, so agree to disagree I suppose.