"Evil and Orwellian"

Recommended Videos

Azraellod

New member
Dec 23, 2008
4,375
0
0
...what the hell?

if they are going to insult the NHS for it's actual flaws, then fine, go right ahead and do that. i care little about that. but if they are resorting to making stuff up... that is crossing a line.
 

notsosavagemessiah

New member
Jul 23, 2009
635
0
0
SilentHunter7 said:
Eskay said:
Fair criticism is all very well and good, I welcome it. No one here would deny that the NHS has a long way to go, but this isn't what is going on. Insulting another countries system to grab a few political points is one thing, making up outright lies to do so is another entirely.
You're just figuring that out, are you? Welcome to the right wing of the United States. They've been using scare tactics and underhanded techniques to get what they want for the last 9 years. You should come and visit. I can take you to a town-hall meeting with members of congress, and you can see lobbyists for the insurance industry shout over other people, and derail the whole meeting. I can show you the commercials where they bring in "real life Canadians" to talk about how they had to wait 10 years for cancer treatment, and how they couldn't get treatment for spinal injuries.

There are people in THIS country, who honestly believe that Barack Obama is using healthcare reform to purge the weak and inferior. No. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8Mc6fLe6Kw] I'm not [http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/240815/august-10-2009/death-panels] kidding. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRBYqazDDr4]

The sad thing is, this is nothing. George Bush lied to us about WMD's. Dick Cheney ordered the withholding of vital information from Congress. Dick Cheney also wanted to deploy troops to Chicago to root out "suspected terrorists." (Even Bush thought that idea was insane) Compared to that, lying about how other countries do heathcare seems tame.

notsosavagemessiah said:
On that end though, my question to republicans is, the armed forces has been getting "socialized" health care for ages now, and while it isn't perfect, it does the job it's supposed to do...
Not only does it do what it's supposed to do, VA healthcare has been rated by multiple standards, surveys, and studies, THE BEST healthcare available in the United States of America.

So a new question emerges, "who isn't this good enough for, the american public? Or the American servicemember?" Yeah, I wins.
 

Lord George

New member
Aug 25, 2008
2,734
0
0
I found this hilarious as well

http://boingboing.net/2009/08/11/anti-health-care-loo.html

Some Republican claiming that Stephen Hawking would not be covered by the NHS because they don't value disabled people while completely ignoring the fact he was born and has lived in the UK for most of his life. .
 

More Fun To Compute

New member
Nov 18, 2008
4,059
0
0
SilentHunter7 said:
Not only does it do what it's supposed to do, VA healthcare has been rated by multiple standards, surveys, and studies, THE BEST healthcare available in the United States of America.
I sort of believe the theory that the US armed forces are the biggest socialist institution on the planet. The republicans do not complain because it is mostly their people who get the jobs and collect the profits.
 

bluepilot

New member
Jul 10, 2009
1,150
0
0
The NHS does fine...it could do a lot better, but I have never heard a story about the NHS bankrupting cancer patients.

Those at the top will do anything to keep the medical insurence companies making huge profits, so they can line their pockets later.

Healthcare should be a service, not means of making profit. Go Obama!!
 

Superlordbasil

New member
Feb 23, 2009
137
0
0
Like many Brits i love to moan about the NHS but it is one of our countries current great achievements. However the chance of other countries creating something similar is low since the NHS is ingrained in our budget since the 50's so we are used to the costs. Poltically too in the 50's the ideals behind the NHS were popular.
 

Ironic

New member
Sep 30, 2008
488
0
0
lenin_117 said:
DrunkWithPower said:
Fat Man Spoon said:
No-one gets to insult the NHS except us Brits!

Although it has it's problems, at least it's free.
*sigh* free healthcare, too bad it's considered socialism (a sin) in America. I hate the right wing sometimes.
NOT FREE
I can see why short-minded individuals might call it socialism, because it's a system that treats EVERYONE equally, regardless of monetary status, for example. We all pay tax towards it, but don't have to pay extra for insurance based on AGE. If I broke my ankle today, in England, I would get treatment in a hospital, for a stay as long as the doctors deemed neccessary based on MY physical state, and the only things i would have to pay, are a £6.75 for each prescription I get from my doctor in the following weeks.

For instance, I could need 50 pills on one subscription, that would last me a month. £6.75. It wouldn't matter how many pills, or what kind. The doctor will put down however many pills I need, for £6.75, and whats more, if you hardly earn any money, you can get ASSISTANCE on that £6.75 payment.

In the USA, if I broke my ankle, it would cost around $16,000 for that and a two week stay, in insurance terms, and if I didn't have insurance, they would dump me on the street.

How can you purport any sort of freedom or justice in that? We do not have a socialist state or socialist healthcare in Britain, we are NOT a socialist country. We have private healthcare aswell, if you want to pay for treatments that are newer and less used, because of the very NATURE of the NHS. It IS funded by taxes, so the majority pays for the few, but it is the same service as the police, and the Fire Department. Are they socialist because the government runs them? Would you rather that you had to have insurance to call the police out to stop your shop being robbed, or you being potentially murdered? Would you prefer your fire department to ask for your insurance number whilst your house burns to the ground with your family inside?

You don't complain about those services that YOU pay for when others need them, and you don't use them every day, but you know they are there don't you? IT is the exact same situation with the NHS, it is a government service, pay for by the citizens, that ensures that whatever wealth bracket you live in, are TREATED and HEALED to the best medical ability there is. As far as doctors careers go, an entry level doctor out of medical training can earn about £25,000 per annum, going up to £60,000 a year per annum for a specialist, and £120,000 a year for a Chief of Medicine (about $41,000 , $100,000 and $199,000 respectively).

Of course you have to "ration" drugs to different areas, but that is purely statistical. Areas with higher financial and medical needs, get MORE funding than others, and if they don't have the facilities/drugs you need, they will generally refer you to another hospital, where you will receive treatment, on the same terms as usual. Certain drugs are not adopted by the NHS, because they are often new, and because of the huge amount of money made from pharmectuical companies BASED IN AMERICA cost a lot, so they have the choice of spending double the money on a new, relatively untested drug, or the same money on a drug they KNOW works, and even if they don't buy it, if you ARE paying for a private medical insurance, you can get it privately anyway.

The attitude of this country when it comes to medicine has always been, treat first, pay later, and I don't know how anyone working in medicine could ever work for a system that denies people treatment based on their wealth, especially when people with less money, tend to get sick MORE OFTEN.

You may have noticed, I want to go into medicine, and it really aggravates me, when political arses try to slander off other systems, and deny their own citizens an easier way of life for their own personal gains.

The NHS may have its flaws, but we can proudly say that our system has two things yours definitely don't. Choice, and morality.

We can choose to go private, and for over 60 years, have cared for our own.


EDIT: I also find it intensely hilarious that none of these people who believe the republicans have seen the irony in complaining about an extra piece of tax, when they already PAY for medical insurance anyway.
 

Faps

New member
Jul 27, 2008
412
0
0
It strikes me as odd that these American conservatives are identify themselves strongly as Christians yet they hate the idea of socialised healthcare. Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't helping your fellow man one of the guiding principles of Christianity.

Also if the American system is great the best system around, why don't we have groups if the UK, France, Germany, Italy and all the other European states calling for an American health system?
 

mokes310

New member
Oct 13, 2008
1,898
0
0
Eskay said:
I've been leafing through the newspapers today and found this lovely little article:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/aug/11/nhs-united-states-republican-health

Something about this annoyed me greatly. The Republicans used to love us as the one country stupid enough to go along with their plans. Now they're out of power it seems they'll start attacking old allies to boost their propaganda machine.

I think the real issue I have is the factual errors. Fair criticism is all very well and good, I welcome it. No one here would deny that the NHS has a long way to go, but this isn't what is going on. Insulting another countries system to grab a few political points is one thing, making up outright lies to do so is another entirely.

Can anyone justify this, or is it the standard "faux" news spewing drivel I'm starting to expect from the Republicans?
Get used to it, that's how they operate. I've been dealing with their bullsh*t for 25 years now...
 

Tranka Verrane

New member
Jul 21, 2008
242
0
0
Of course it's not free, you idiots, free healthcare doesn't exist anywhere. However anyone can access it whether they have billions or no money at all, and many people who can afford private healthcare in the UK prefer to use the NHS anyway. That's as near to free as makes no odds.

Coming out of your taxes rather than as separate medical insurance just means that even if you could not afford the insurance you are still covered. That means that the NHS tries to cut corners wherever it can to save cash. Cheap does not always mean ineffective, just more inconvenient. You might get an ugly, obvious hearing aid instead of an almost invisible one, for instance. It still works.

As for the dental superglue thing: As im sure Americans are aware dentistry is an anomaly in the UK. It is largely private as ugly teeth aren't really seen as life threatening, and many of those who could afford to have teeth fixed don't because they object to paying for this aspect of healthcare when they are so used to getting everything else for free. You're telling me no-one in the US has ever resorted to ridiculous self-treatment because they perceived they couldn't afford something? Pull the other one.

If you think that using superglue on teeth is recommended practice you're just a big bunch of freaking idiots and I wash my hands of the lot of you.

I might also add that Orwell was a socialist who was one of the first campaigners for the welfare state and he would turn in his grave if he knew that his name was being used in this way because of a single book. If anything is reminiscent of 1984 here it is the Republican propaganda machine.
 

Mr Companion

New member
Jul 27, 2009
1,534
0
0
Dahemo said:
I'm British but this is just typical Republican scare-mongering, what saddens me is that it's never been this bad before. The Republicans were out the door five minutes then started loudly decrying everything Obama did, creating horrific fallacies to fool people into believing the outlandish tales, of which this is but a drop in the ocean. I don't think Clinton ever got such strong opposition so early, I'm sure his plans weren't greeted as conspiracies or evil.

Obviously with a lower rated healthcare system (consistent throughout the Bush-era) than the UK, it is exceedingly rich to cast aspersions from a US perspective, especially one vehemenently opposed to reform.

The only thing that worries me here is that Obama's approval ratings have dropped. This actually beggars belief, and means that after months of "No Stimulus!", "No Healtcare!", "No Abortions!" the people are starting to listen to the party of no. The party with no ideas of it's own, just a staunch opposition to whatever the President is doing. I can't think of a sadder indictment of western politics than Michelle Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Mark Stamford, Bobby Jindall, Cheney, Bush...the list goes on, but unfortunately, it never stops. There is always a new moron, or worse, a new intelligent fear-monger whipping up the crowds with lies, half-truths and barely concealed racial slurs...
Very true, My opinion exactly. It is so depressing really, that you never find a political leader interested in making peoples lives better.

lenin_117 said:
Fat Man Spoon said:
lenin_117 said:
Fat Man Spoon said:
lenin_117 said:
Fat Man Spoon said:
No-one gets to insult the NHS except us Brits!

Although it has it's problems, at least it's free.
OOOOOOHH. It isn't though. You pay for it with your taxes. Didn't you get the brochure?
Yep, it's INCLUDED in the tax. America has to pay separately.
Thats my point. Your taxes are approximately one health insurance fee higher then they would be w/o it.
Yes, but you're paying the government directly, rather than a greedy third-party company.
And you get shit coverage as expected. Good coverage would cost too much.
Ok well lets look at how it is in America: You get less taxes, but no healthcare. So you have to pay extra for healthcare, which costs a metric ton of cash. By gods our British system is so much more ineffective I say with sarcasm gushing from every orifice man has named.

In addition you likely feel this way since you have heard it from, say, the news. But it is important to realise that the reason America has turned into uproar about NHS is because this would decrease the money intake of those in charge of American healthcare, and those people have been producing propaganda in order to eliminate the threat. The people running the current health service likely receive quite a hefty pay check and wish to undermine this new "equality" they have being hearing so much about. Keep an eye on the motivations of you political leaders.

Anyway I see other people have taken the same approach to your post and you have decided to research the topic to a more extensive degree. Therefore this response was entirely pointless, damn.
 

SilentHunter7

New member
Nov 21, 2007
1,652
0
0
Ironic said:
EDIT: I also find it intensely hilarious that none of these people who believe the republicans have seen the irony in complaining about an extra piece of tax, when they already PAY for medical insurance anyway.
Mr Companion said:
Ok well lets look at how it is in America: You get less taxes, but no healthcare. So you have to pay extra for healthcare, which costs a metric ton of cash.
The ironic thing is, the public option in the Democrat's plan won't even be paid for by tax dollars. The government will charge a premium to anyone on the plan (who can reasonably afford it). Everyone will have the option of paying for government insurance, or private insurance. Except the government will play it as a zero-sum game, balancing rates with claims, and making no profit, as opposed to the private sector, who increases rates, and minimizes claims to maximize profit.
 

phi161

New member
Aug 3, 2009
98
0
0
Dahemo said:
lenin_117 said:
Fat Man Spoon said:
lenin_117 said:
Fat Man Spoon said:
lenin_117 said:
Fat Man Spoon said:
No-one gets to insult the NHS except us Brits!

Although it has it's problems, at least it's free.
OOOOOOHH. It isn't though. You pay for it with your taxes. Didn't you get the brochure?
Yep, it's INCLUDED in the tax. America has to pay separately.
Thats my point. Your taxes are approximately one health insurance fee higher then they would be w/o it.
Yes, but you're paying the government directly, rather than a greedy third-party company.
And you get shit coverage as expected. Good coverage would cost too much.
Ok well lets look at how it is in America: You get less taxes, but no healthcare. So you have to pay extra for healthcare, which costs a metric ton of cash. By gods our British system is so much more ineffective I say with sarcasm gushing from every orifice man has named.

-snip-
People take the piss out of the British NHS, but its a damn sight better than most other countries. I would much rather have to go to an English NHS hospital than any where else in the world, despite the ridiculous waiting times.

Simply put British NHS > American NHS
 

Eskay

New member
Sep 2, 2007
303
0
0
phi161 said:
Simply put British NHS > American NHS
American NHS? There is none! Though by Republican perceptions the acronym stands for "Nazi's Helping Socialists"

Socialism by republican definitions appears to be defined as any action involving not being a selfish dick.



SilentHunter7 said:
You're just figuring that out, are you? Welcome to the right wing of the United States. They've been using scare tactics and underhanded techniques to get what they want for the last 9 years....
Oh I know it goes on, I just usually expect these people to have the intelligence to avoid outright falsehoods (Sarah Palin is excepted from this naturally). Relying on extreme examples, exaggerating, using creative statistics; these are all techniques that work fine and are very hard to argue against as they are not strictly untrue. To what's being said here however the response is simple, "This is a lie, you have made it up". Truly amateur politics, but the sickening part is some people seem to lap it up still.

Thanks for the links, I've never seen Olbermann before. I like his style, though there's something that makes me chuckle each time he does a turn to the camera.
 

DigitalSushi

a gallardo? fine, I'll take it.
Dec 24, 2008
5,717
0
0
More Fun To Compute said:
The NHS is free at the point of use but is most definitely not free and saying so is not only misinformation but is easy for critics to spot and mock. Some Doctors get paid very well indeed and are free to engage in as much freedom, capitalism and coca cola as they want.

There is some rationing in the system to make sure money is being spent where it can do the most good. If you are filthy rich you can still pay for that expensive treatment that probably will not work and would drain resources away from other areas.
Sweet, I had one of those pioneering surgeries performed on me by on of the leading cardio vascular surgeons on the planet, on the NHS, purely because he wanted to practise.

Thank god I was at the NHS hospital at that particular time.

I'd defend the NHS till my dying day, I've only had good things from it, not quite as good as the French but still amazing stuff.
 

thylasos

New member
Aug 12, 2009
1,920
0
0
ColdStorage said:
I'd defend the NHS till my dying day, I've only had good things from it, not quite as good as the French but still amazing stuff.
Less suppositories, too.
 

Nmil-ek

New member
Dec 16, 2008
2,597
0
0
We dont need to even defend ourselves we can point to the fact that our healthcare is cheaper per head covers more and we are significantly healthier as a nation (like 18th ranked to 37th healthier) dust our hands and walk off argument over.
 

DigitalSushi

a gallardo? fine, I'll take it.
Dec 24, 2008
5,717
0
0
thylasos said:
ColdStorage said:
I'd defend the NHS till my dying day, I've only had good things from it, not quite as good as the French but still amazing stuff.
Less suppositories, too.
haha, yeah, when I was given a thermometer in the UK I stuck it up me bum, you know, thats how we do that in France.

Apparently not in England, anyway, I asked for a fresh one to stick in my mouth.