Therumancer said:
People become smarter, faster, and stronger with each generation.
No they don't. Not for genetic reasons at any rate.
We constantly see athletic records being broken for this reason,
That's not evolution, that just people pushing themselves further and understanding their diet better. Record breakers from 1900 could have done everything record breakers of today do if they had the incentive and diet, but they had neither of those things.
Evolution isn't involved anywhere.
as well as the simple fact that we suffer a lot of social problems where children are concerned because they have been progressing intellectually (becoming smarter, faster) than our society wants to acknowlege or deal with, especially seeing as it still doesn't come with the emotional maturity and experience that one would expect with that level of intelligence. This is why we have so many "shocking" cases of child criminals, with kids doing things that people think they should not be capable of. The increased capabilities and intellect combined with childlike attitudes and an as-of-yet undeveloped moral compass means that on some levels we're living an omni-present "evil child" novel or movie. Of course such sociology (there has been a bit written on it) has little place here.
Children of today do thing we don't expect of them because modern society assumes people are children until they are 18. 200 years ago children were working from the age of 7 or younger, they still are in some places. Children have always been able to do the things they are today, the only difference is so many adults don't want to believe it.
Again, nothing to do with evolution.
The only kind of flashy POSITIVE evolutionary change that we might see would be the development of psychic powers. Of course that's pushing it, but it's remotely possible due to the fact that some scientists have allegedly found that we are verrrrry slowly using more and more of our brains. Depending on what those by and large "inert" portions of the brain actually do, if anything, we might see something impressive coming from that direction in following generations.
Humans are
not using more and more of their brains. Why? Because we already use 100% of them. Any other idea is a myth.
Why would there be a force trying to stop humans from overpopulating? What would that force be. As it stands our numbers
are still increasing. Overpopulation
may be a problem one day, but it isn't
yet. For the sake of spreading our genes, a gene which curbs our spreading would not be evolutionarily successful at all. The only time could be is if we were
already in a situation where our numbers were causing us to starve. Which, in the western world, they clearly are not.
Again, as I said in my first post, evolution doesn't follow rules or care about the future, it is just a physical process where the gene that spreads itself the most becomes the gene which is most common.