Extra Punctuation: Hating Warhammer 40k and Space Marine

Recommended Videos

Ragsnstitches

New member
Dec 2, 2009
1,871
0
0
Can someone tell me if I'm just imagining things as worse then they actually are because of a personal soft spot for all things 40k, but was this EP particularly venomous (and even more biased) then normal?

Look, I know the Lore of 40k is semi-trashy sci-fi fantasy and the games are convoluted and easily stereotyped (to a degree in that they started the stereotyping in some cases). But it's fun if your into semi-thrashy things, or offbeat sci-fi fantasy.

And did he actually try to compare the DnD crowed with the 40k crowed and claim one to be superior? Or was that a joke that went over my head?

darthricardo said:
Really, I love the Warhammer 40k setting, except for one small caveat.
There is only war.
I mean, after Ten. THOUSAND. YEARS... something would have to give. I mean, yeah, a prolonged state of technoligical regression, I can get that. The world being more or less static, largely based on the near-immortality of the ruling class? I feel that. But after spending so long embroiled in an endless war, something would happen.
I guess the entire premise is an extended dramatization of the stupid old question: What happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object?
Well... "in the far distant future, we found a compromise" doesn't exactly carry itself for an epic, now does it?
 

rayen020

New member
May 20, 2009
1,138
0
0
rda_Highlander said:
It's been bugging me for quite some time, and I just can't calm down about it.
THEY ARE NOT SPACE MARINES. THERE IS NO WATER IN SPACE. THEY ARE SPACE INFANTRY, damnit!

It so pisses me off, I can almost see the people who came up with this name, think "They should be the MOST badass awesome hardcore ubermencsh in entire world! Dhuur, what is the most awesome army type we heard about? Oh, they're called marines! Awesome!"
I'm sorry, it just makes me so irritated for some reason.
A marine, as a military term, is a type of soldier who specializes ship to ship combat and amphibious or trans-terrain warfare. The US Marines are naval infantry, and in many countries marine (in the military sense) translates almost exactly to that. The term space is applied to the front to note that they are a space going marine, also seen in spaceship, space shuttle, space capsule. They are Marines in that they work both on ships and land and can battle equally effectively on either of them.
 

Evil Alpaca

New member
May 22, 2010
225
0
0
"You know what Warhammer 40K is? It's the product of a generation that has never known any kind of real conflict or struggle."

Yeah... this statement is pretty much bull.

This argument makes no sense when combined with the later statement about Warhammer 40k being juvenile. If the game is juvenile fantasy, then unless you plan on marketing this to child soldiers, your target audience CAN NOT POSSIBLY have known the kind of real conflict or struggle alluded to by mentioning the Somme. Calling the game childish or a juvenile fantasy isn't too far-fetched but you can't then say that the people who enjoy such flights of fantasy only do so because they don't known what the reality of situations like this are.


Here is an example of a product appealing to the "glory of battle" in a worst possible scenario of war - THE ILIAD. When normal wars for the time lasted months, this war lasted years with endless killing on both sides. You have two sides, neither of which are the "good" guys. (Achilles spends a couple of chapters continually trying to desecrate the body of his enemy or murdering prisoners) The story doesn't even show an end to the war, it simply shows that the Greeks and Trojans are going to kill each other in a more civilized fashion rather than the brutal slug-fest they have been in.
 

SilverUchiha

New member
Dec 25, 2008
1,602
0
0
plugav said:
SilverUchiha said:
I couldn't agree more with the point of wanting to play D&D for the storytelling aspect. I love the way it allows you to pursue the story and roleplay aspect. But I've only played with groups that like the combat only and don't give a shit about the story.
My impression has always been that D&D promotes combat-oriented play. It's one of the reasons why I've always prefered Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay (the 1st and 2nd editions, I haven't read the 3rd). The combat is there, but your party is far less likely to be a professional dungeoun-crawling commando unit.
Cool. FYI, wasn't knocking that Warhammer didn't have story or anything. I was just saying I agreed with his point about D&D and that's it.

As for your thoughts on promoting combat-oriented play, it really depends on what version and what books you look at. If you do 3.5 and have a library of digital copies of all a lot of the books, it feels more like a story-telling roleplay experience. If you have 4.0 at all, then it is going to feel more combat oriented. Which is why I have not bothered trying to learn 4.0 yet aside from just not caring enough.
 

StrixMaxima

New member
Sep 8, 2008
298
0
0
Hmm, this is probably the first time I must disagree with pretty much everything this illustrious reviewer has to say. Tone, motif, background, etc, etc were dealt sloppily by someone who obviously don't know much about this setting, it's history, and who didn't care to do some research to back his arguments up.

Gut feeling and guffaws do not a good analysis make.
 

mrhateful

True Gamer
Apr 8, 2010
428
0
0
and I though I was pretentious....

I can see I didn't hate it as much as Yahtzee however my oppinion of the game was that the story lacked depth. Especially because the lore felt as though there was much depth to it but it was just never shown in the game which is kinda sad :(
 

jonyboy13

New member
Aug 13, 2010
671
0
0
ACman said:
Tau are space communists.
You sir, cracked me up. This is the funniest WH40K joke I heard lately.
Anyway, totally agree with you. Basically everyone are crazy alien haters who seem to look for excuses to kill others.

You know, I figured that they should have some damn evolve nukes so far to into the future.
 

omegawyrm

New member
Nov 23, 2009
322
0
0
Yeah, this is pretty much the dumbest thing Yahtzee has written since that one column where he said there aren't any good stories about the Batman character because he never changes. Demonstrates the same total blindness to the property he is criticizing and also misses the central theme entirely at the same time.

But it's sure a good thing we have Yahtzee around to be "brutally honest". Everyone knows that online fandom communities don't have enough arrogant bitching. Certainly we don't have nearly enough negativity already. Nope, we don't have any of those things.
 

rda_Highlander

New member
Nov 19, 2010
69
0
0
rayen020 said:
A marine, as a military term, is a type of soldier who specializes ship to ship combat and amphibious or trans-terrain warfare. The US Marines are naval infantry, and in many countries marine (in the military sense) translates almost exactly to that. The term space is applied to the front to note that they are a space going marine, also seen in spaceship, space shuttle, space capsule. They are Marines in that they work both on ships and land and can battle equally effectively on either of them.
Although I agree with what you say, it still isn't nearly their definition. All I've seen of them is standing in the field/trees/mud and shooting from heavy weaponry/ripping with swords/bashing with charisma. The Guards are more suited to be called "space marines" as far as I can tell. The marines themselves are more of a paratrooper kind. Oh, right! Space Troopers! That's what I'd call them. Although there are already certain Starship Troopers, but that's beyond the case.
 

Normandyfoxtrot

New member
Feb 17, 2011
246
0
0
I agree that Space Marine is a terrible game that managed to ruin a handful of decent enough ideas with a lot of meh. It is also a terrible ambassador of it's over all universe and that's probably my biggest hate of it. As far as the universe I think Yahtzee is wrong, but expecting some one who isn't mind you any kind of journalist to do due research is probably just expecting too much.
 

mjc0961

YOU'RE a pie chart.
Nov 30, 2009
3,846
0
0
I don't care much for Space Marine or whatever it is either. The most interesting thing I got from that is that he played Gears 3. Hopefully the review of that is coming soon.
 

Char-Nobyl

New member
May 8, 2009
784
0
0
At any rate, I guess this is why I rely on Yahtzee for two things: humor, and the occasional game recommendation. If I need a review of a game, I can either use another website, or just the Escapist's reviews, simply because they're not burdened by the load of having to make their assessment funny.

I was a bit baffled by his depiction of the 40k universe, though. I can't remember the last time anyone was depicted as taking an admirable point of view when they talked about "the glory of battle." In the Gaunt's Ghosts books especially, war isn't glorified in the slightest. And his literal interpretation of the "there is only war" stuff just comes across as petty, like 40k stole his girlfriend and he's scrambling for reasons to insult it.

And, bizarrely, he literally summed the game up as being exactly like Gears of War. I'm questioning whether or not he actually played the game around that point, and given his previous rantings, it's clear that he wants it to be one thing and is dead set on depicting it to be that.

It's a damn shame. I've seen him rant and be funny at the same time before, but this is just...weird, like comparing a racist rant to a sketch from the Chappelle show. With previous stuff, it at least felt like he was enjoying it, but now it's just blind hate.
 

KingHodor

New member
Aug 30, 2011
167
0
0
I always thought that WH40K was very much different from any other type of military Sci-Fi because its tongue has been pretty much surgically attached to the inside of its cheek.

Most military Sci-Fi seems to be all about glorifying the heroic exploits of their warrior protagonists, and how their will to fight makes them so much better than the pitiful civilians. Heck, someone once showed me a novel where an alien-besieged Federal Republic of Germany used alien biotechnology to rejuvenate their WW2 veterans and re-establish the Waffen-SS (complete with railgun-equipped "Tiger III" tanks), and anyone who disagreed with this brilliant plan was implied to be a pinko liberal traitor to humanity by the (American) author.

In WH40K, on the other hand, it is made abundantly clear that the space marines, for all their badassery, are completely brainwashed crusaders fighting for a corrupt theocracy that would probably be considered pure evil were it not for the fact that their opponents are either even more evil or simply outside of any definition of "morality".
 

Frankster

Space Ace
Mar 13, 2009
2,507
0
0
Harkonnen64 said:
Let's think about this for a moment. In a game and setting dominated by big, burly men in equally big, burly armor, the inclusion of a female character would had to have been something the creators went out of their way to do. And if they would go out of their way to put a female character in a situation where her authority is questioned, they would have had to recognize the possible (or maybe intentional) sexist implications. She didn't "happen" to be a woman, she was deliberately made a woman. Don't underplay the issue.
The creators might have been deliberately made a woman, but her authority due to gender isn't what is questioned, that was yahtzee misreading the scene.
Rather the space marine asking is surprised because she is the ONLY officer left alive, and a low ranking one at that.

"At one point the boy's club happens upon an outpost commander who has been talked up by other characters for a while and discovers that she's an attractive young lady. "Oh god, you chunky fucks are going to be taken aback by this, aren't you," I predicted. And sure enough, they were, in the least emotional possible way"

You see where yahtzee got it wrong? He read the line as sm going "wat ?a gurl in command" and in doing so he misreads the scene and his understanding of 40k worsens.

As for downplaying the issue and whether the guy writing the dialogue realized the possible intentional/misintentional sexist implications of that particular line and was trying to bring an up an issue or seek to play a little joke on the players prejudices....
Eugh...Do you really want to chat about that? That topic doesn't enthrall me, would rather go back to bitching/white knighting 40k.
 

Living Cover

New member
Nov 18, 2009
4
0
0
Hm. I thoroughly enjoyed the game from start to finish. But I suppose it should be mentioned I play tabletop Warhammer 40K (Orks) and love the Dawn of War strategy series:p
 

Ampersand

New member
May 1, 2010
736
0
0
I felt like this game with just a few adjustments could have been really really good, but as it stands it's just alright.
 

Normandyfoxtrot

New member
Feb 17, 2011
246
0
0
Katatori-kun said:
sharpe95th said:
Why are any of your surprised the skinny nerdy man who loves fantasy, wears a stupid hat, and has a pretentious beard doesn't like military fiction?
40K isn't really "military fiction" though. It is absurd. We're talking about a world where 9 ft tall super-soldiers paint their power armour in bright, primary colors because in the dark future of the 41st millennium, camo is apparently for pussies.

Most of the vehicles are ridiculous. The designs of the rhinos and land raiders just couldn't work. Now for your average 13 year old kid, realism isn't necessary. But to call this game military fiction demands a basic level of believability.

40K is juvenile, and it's juvenile in that particular style of trying to pretend it's adult. It tries so hard to be GRIMDARK that it trips all over itself and looks like a clown. How many terrain pieces for 40K do you see that have evidence that people once lived on the battlefield that is being fought over- you know, broken appliances, every day rubbish (note, not rubble) in the streets, maybe a child's toy left behind because the family had to evacuate without even the time to look back? Now how many terrain pieces for 40K do you see that are strewn with skulls for no particular reason other than perhaps that the Spikey Marines like stacking skulls in their free time?

I don't agree with everything Yahtzee said here (I'm in the hobby for the painting converting, and I got into miniature gaming because of the terrible people I used to have available to table-top RP with.) But those things are opinions, and it doesn't threaten me if not everyone shares mine. But as for the general character of the game- I think he's spot-on.
If you want that narrow definition than every non-historical based military piece or writing is "ridiculous" including star ship troopers which is supposed to be the A standard for military-fiction.
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
Stu35 said:
Well I've read the Horus Heresy novels. And yes, the 40k universe is incredibly retarded, but it's fun, and it's fantasy, and it doesn't really matter that it makes no sense on an economic level.

As always however, a very funny article.
Don't expect this to be the popular response.

But it is pretty spot on (as someone else who read HH).