You two...I like the way you think! Can we be friends? :3suitepee7 said:this guy... this guy has got it. if i'm honest, i preferred FO3's map and layouts, i thought in general the locations were more interesting, but otherwise NV was better in nearly every respect. THAT SAID, i fucking loved FO3, despite its flaws, and i'm psyched that they're finally making a new one.Drummodino said:The negativity in this thread makes me sad
WE'RE GETTING MORE FALLOUT GUYS! HOW IS THAT A BAD THING?
Hell I liked Fallout:NV more than Fallout 3 and Skyrim. Yet I'm still pumped for this game. Who knows, maybe Bethesda will take some hints from NV and incorporate the best of both Obsidian and themselves.
Imagine a Fallout game with better graphics than Skyrim (new console gen). Keep that drool in your mouth boy.
with any luck they will learn from the criticisms of skyrim, and the successes of NV, but i find it very hard not to be excited about the prospect of a new fallout game
Fallout 3 had an amazing sense of atmosphere and world-building. It simply felt like a wasteland and I was awestruck the first time I ever played a full 3D open-world FALLOUT game! (Seriously, the first time you step out of the vault is priceless)
New Vegas came along with all it's much appreciated and needed tweaks to the system and Obsidian improved on the formula. Now it might be a bit much to hope for Bethesda to take the new tweaks into account, but the fan outcry since NV would be difficult to ignore.
Both games have their strengths, both have flaws, but as far as any future Fallout game goes...the positives far outweigh the negatives in any regard. I love both and I am over the frikkin' moon to hear about Fallout 4.
I mean - we're getting more Fallout, more content, new shiny graphics, new...EVERYTHING!
Yes, I'm unapologetically hyped.