Fallout: *Insert City Here*
- Thread starter Zantos
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Fallout: Concord (NH) would be the most BORING GAME EVER. On the other hand, I'd have to say Fallout: New New York (from Futurama) would be kind of cool. I'd love to explore the sewers a bit as well as the ruins of Old New York. And I'm sure the devs could come up with a way to blame it all on Zoidberg.
It's not so much about the story but about the character of the games themselves. Fallout as a game was modeled after what Americans in the 50's expected the future to look like. All the nuclear powered cares, Mr. Handy's, laser guns and what not were all created to fit that style. A Fallout game set in Tokyo,Sydney or what have could certainly be and excellent game but it wouldn't really be a Fallout game. It would just be another post-apocalyptic (inset genre here). However, I do agree, variety is good. But their is still plenty of variety left in the states.AnarchistFish said:
Basically anyplace not the U.S, new vegas was a great place because vegas is an interesting city, as is washington. It is time, however, we seen what is happening outside the U.S. London would be good, so would Paris, Rome, Cairo, Dubai, the list goes on, it would be interesting to me to include some of the wonders of the world in the surrounding areas.
Yes! This! And the bestiary would be immense due to a wide range of plentiful wildlife that could now be mutated. Plus it would be interesting to see the whole return to roots tribalism of the locals.mikespoff said:
Yeah, but people in other country too had visions of the future. So why not creating a 50's like vision(probably also influenced by Americas technology) of other major cities around the world? Cities where objects and equipment that is/were more common in the previous game are much rarer (imported only in small number before by smugglers or spies, crashed transporter etc.). Hell, even the Enclave would be possible (Survivors that moved to X to regroup, after being defeated in Washington, D.C.).Thamous said:
A whole game based on another city might be too much to ask for, but as DLC it would be more than possible.
Toronto
Roswell
Cancun
Jamaica
Australia
London
Ireland
(I know not all of my posts are cities but they're areas I think would be good settings for fallout games)
Montreal
Cuba
Hawaii
Florida (You can go to Disney land and loot a body for a mascot costume and Disney land could be turned into a fortress)
Florence, Itally
Rio, Brazil
Chicago
Roswell
Cancun
Jamaica
Australia
London
Ireland
(I know not all of my posts are cities but they're areas I think would be good settings for fallout games)
Montreal
Cuba
Hawaii
Florida (You can go to Disney land and loot a body for a mascot costume and Disney land could be turned into a fortress)
Florence, Itally
Rio, Brazil
Chicago
Europe and the Middle East destroyed each other in their resource war, then Europe destroyed themselves in when the European Commonwealth colapsed. And all of that before the great war. The US and mabye China and the USSR were the only countries that would have been capable of building the vaults, and China had suffered from the US Power Armored soldier invasions along with the majority of the US's nukes. Most European countries with the Resource Wars and their in fighting and then the Great War most likely have nothing left. Africa and South America might have survived the Great War thoughdeckai said:
Rio might actually be fully intact, and chances are there is nothing left of European cities. I do however love your idea for Florida, now I want a Disneyworld fortress....I shall name it....steve. Althought would Disney still have been built in this time line?dngamecat said:
Fallout: Rhode Island
Interestingly enough, albeit being rendered debatabley non-cannon with the release of Fallout: New Vegas, Fallout 3 mentioned that Rhode Island and the northeastern US hosted 'The Commonwealth'. The Common wealth was apparently a society that retained or rediscovered most of the pre-war technologies and developed their own, even being able to create androids and cyborgs.
So yes, I'd say a fallout game based in RI would be pretty interesting. Of course, Obsidian would probably tweak the name to "Fallout: Road Island" to be faithful to their trend of intentionally misspelling or abbreviating know geographic locations to drive the whole 'post-apocalypse' theme further.
Interestingly enough, albeit being rendered debatabley non-cannon with the release of Fallout: New Vegas, Fallout 3 mentioned that Rhode Island and the northeastern US hosted 'The Commonwealth'. The Common wealth was apparently a society that retained or rediscovered most of the pre-war technologies and developed their own, even being able to create androids and cyborgs.
So yes, I'd say a fallout game based in RI would be pretty interesting. Of course, Obsidian would probably tweak the name to "Fallout: Road Island" to be faithful to their trend of intentionally misspelling or abbreviating know geographic locations to drive the whole 'post-apocalypse' theme further.
I'm curious where do they misspell names of locations? Oh and The Commonwealth came from MITChimichanga said:
Fallout: Des Moines. Lots of Brahmin, hordes of bloodthirsty mutant crows (around the ruins of the Principal Building), and a wacky cult of ghouls that worship the last Iowa State Fair Buttercow.
I know, I'm a avid fan myself. But that doesn't mean there absolute nothing left. Chances are, there are still a few survivors left. But my point is, we don't know much about the rest of the world during the war and even less after the war, there is much more room for development (story-wise) than in any other place in North-America.azraelthor said:
