SvenBTB said:
Treblaine said:
My most hated ones are the apologists, such as for the Metal Gear series.
Hideo Kojima has created some of the greatest games in the history of the art form but he has also been extraordinarily hackish, self-derivative and inane yet is not held to account for it. I suppose it's George Lucas syndrome.
As an MGS fanboy I don't see these apologists as true fanboys, I look on them as Star Wars fans who like the Prequel Trilogy: traitors. A real fan is truer to the vision than even the creator and is not swayed by money or imitation or need to "outdo the previous".
I can't tell, are you using "fanboy" as a positive or negative term here?
It's a neutral term.
The word "fan" alone doesn't have much meaning, people can be "a fan" of lots of things but not really care much about it. For example people say they are a fan of the James Bond movies yet they admit they haven't even seen more than half of them all the way through.
So fanboy for something, you're very keen for something and have AN OPINION on it.
Yeah, the implication of bias is definitely there but if you can call yourself a fanboy and admit that bias, doesn't that do a lot to diffuse it? The problem with bias is when it is hidden and unacknowledged.
True fanboys have PASSION. That means when it is good they LOOOVE IT! and when it is bad THEY RAAEEGE!! Fanboys who only love and covet their hate are, well, how would I distinguish them.
I call them apologists, they make excuses for shortcomings and prevent the thing we love being as good as we expect it to be. They are enablers of artists turning to trash.
Now I'm a mere fan of the Halo series, but not a fanboy. That is I played every game but never really loved its best bits and didn't really care when it fell short.