Fans Tear New Mass Effect Book to Shreds

Lovely Mixture

New member
Jul 12, 2011
1,474
0
0
Mass Effect has been going downhill after the second game (and I say this as someone who really loves the characterization in the second game) and this comes as no surprise. Bioware used to be the most recent top-tier in videogame storytelling but they have been losing a lot on that ground recently.

People can blame EA for this downhill turn, but responsibility still lies with Bioware.

Dietz can be blamed for this work itself, but if Bioware is intent on maintaining their peace with the fanbase they should do something about it (and also fire Hepler while they can)


Leftnt Sharpe said:
-Dan Abnett (Pretty self-explanatory)

It should be noted that when comparing tie-in books to actual works of literature they should be moved down one category. For example a book that is 'tie-in good' is merely average by normal standards and Dan Abnett would be reduced from 'God Emperor of tie-in fiction mancrush level' to merely good.

Please feel free to rip apart my life's work.
I laughed outloud at this. Good show sir! As someone who knows Dan Abnett's work (I loved Horus Rising) I knew exactly what you were about to say.

I only read Dietz's Halo novel long ago (when I was into Halo), it wasn't great (Nylund's work was more in-depth) but it at least conveyed an nice atmosphere for the Haloverse (ie. making it into more of a horror war setting).
 
Aug 1, 2010
2,768
0
0
You know, I can handle and inconsistency or two. I can accept getting something slightly wrong. But in a universe where 50% of the time could be spent READING THE LORE, there is no excuse for this.
It just comes off as lazy that they didn't check it and that he didn't ask.

Reminds me of when Halo: Cryptum came out.....
 

Geo Da Sponge

New member
May 14, 2008
2,611
0
0
Wow, reading that list is just painful... How could you screw up the important details that badly?

I should point out that in the document they have the errors marked as more significant or less significant, so they obviously do recognise when something's just a nitpick. However when the writer's making glaring continuity errors within the book series itself and in reference to the games it's a bit of a problem.
 

Hitchmeister

New member
Nov 24, 2009
453
0
0
The real question is, is this just the work of an incredibly lazy hack writer, or did he have a design document from the third game to work from and is Bioware throwing established canon to the four winds in the third game and several of the most grievous errors are going to be repeated there causing an even greater degree of wailing and gnashing of teeth?


I'm getting my popcorn ready.
 

Hunter.Wolf

New member
Jan 13, 2010
87
0
0
It seems people missed the irony that is the name of the book ... "Deception" .. well played XD
 

Madman123456

New member
Feb 11, 2011
590
0
0
"Fans Tear New Mass Effect Book to Shreds"
To Shreds you say...

Points to whoever gets the Reference.


This is Valid Critizism, you don't need Hours and Hours in the Gameworld to know that the "Volus" People come from a Planet with a very thick Atmossphere and have to wear pressurized Suits, lest they explode. Says so in the Codex, the entry about the Volus is available when you meet the first Volus. Not exactly something that is mentioned in the Background and totally obscure.

Also relatively obvious in the Game: The Humans apparently have Colonies right next to the Batarians. They wanted to settle there, but the Council said "Nuh-uh! the Humans are going there!". Ok, that may make Sense, since we don't know how many Colonies the Batarians do have and if the Council enforces a Limit for that.
What doesn't make Sense is that the Batarians would fly right past the Human Colonies which they have raided for Slaves several times (and still there are Colonies with about ten People and others with millions...)and decided to go to the Home Planet of the Turians, which probably is the best defended Planet of the Turians, which are a People consisting of militaristic Army Nuts.

The Human Batarian thing is mentioned in the first Game by the Turian Councilor.
The Rest is in the Codex. Every single Turian goes from School directly to the Military while the rate of Volunteers for the Military is about 3% of the Populace, which is the lowest Percentage of all the Races apparently.

This isn't something you can only know when you memorized every Book, Comic and Game.

It's in the Codex, which you can read in both the Games. Which you should read when you're about to write a Novel about it. Do at least *some* Research in your Target Area, otherwise People may call you "lazy".
 

Turtleboy1017

Likes Turtles
Nov 16, 2008
865
0
0
Stormwaltz said:
Hey folks. A quick note: "element zero" is a human nickname. It should not be interpreted to mean eezo is a literal element. In the in-game codex, it's referred to with the deliberately vague term "material."

When subjected to an electrical current, the rare material dubbed element zero, or "eezo", emits a dark energy field that raises or lowers the mass of all objects within it. This "mass effect" is used in countless ways, from generating artificial gravity to manufacturing high-strength construction materials. It is most prominently used to enable faster-than-light space travel.

Eezo is generated when solid matter, such as a planet, is affected by the energy of a star going supernova. The material is common in the asteroid debris that orbit neutron stars and pulsars. These are dangerous places to mine, requiring extensive use of robotics, telepresence, and shielding to survive the incredible radiation from the dead star... (snip)
It is "unobtainium" (i.e., made-up BS). But it's most emphatically NOT an element. I helped develop the tech base and wrote all the ME1 codex entries, so I can speak with some authority on that. :)

Mimsofthedawg said:
It's actually mentioned that most of the Turian fleet was destroyed in the Battle of the Citadel by the Geth...
This is inaccurate. Most of the Citadel Fleet was destroyed at the Battle of the Citadel, but Council peacekeeping forces are stationed throughout the galaxy. Most significantly, none of the 37 turian dreadnoughts were at the Citadel (and they had completed two more by the time of ME2). Canonically, the Council lost 20 turian cruisers - this is stated in the al-Jilani interview from ME2 - and possibly (depending on player choice) the Destiny Ascension.
Cool we have a celebrity in our midst! Well... kind of a celebrity. To me. I read almost every single codex in both games because I was really really sick of seeing that one "Codex" tab always highlighted when I paused the game. Out of frustration I began scrolling down every single entry to unhighlight it, and ended up reading essentially every single one.

I really did kind of prefer Mass Effect 1. I have no idea if you had anything at all to do with any of the actual gameplay development, but ME1 felt endless. I litreally beat ME2. There was nothing left to do for me, I read every single letter of flavor text in that game, talked to everyone I possibly could, and found every little secret in every single level.

Anyway back on topic, I read the first 3 books, loved them, and guess I'll be passing on this one.

Also Karren Travis sucks dick. All her stories inject stupid sappy love crap that makes 0 sense. She did an okay job with the first 2 Republic Commando novels, but positively butchered Halo as well as the 3rd and 4th novels for Republic Commando. I'm glad she won't be writing any more of those, just make a new game.
 

Piorn

New member
Dec 26, 2007
1,097
0
0
I'm not really into extended Universes, but this must feel pretty bad for the author. I feel sorry for him.
 

Bara_no_Hime

New member
Sep 15, 2010
3,646
0
0
Foxtrotk72 said:
these guys are idiots i reckon i dont really care if there's plot holes in ME i guess some people want to share there frustration with the world. I haven't read any ME novels so i feel sorry for the author who wrote this he/she tried there best to do it but the fans are bitching seems like it to me, i love Mass Effect i really do even though im mocking the fans but to be honest there just whining to me
SonOfVoorhees said:
I guess no one checks it. I read the list and there are some really obvious mistakes although others are a bit nit picky. especially when dealing with a sci-fi novel. Thing is, even the creators are not the best people to check the book before being published, only a die hard fan is qualified....same as with Star Trek and Star Wars. Need nerds to proof read it and ensure its correct.
aftohsix said:
Nitpicking is nitpicking. A large number of complaints about Mass Effect 2 boil down to the same issue. 'Why is the lore inconsistent.'

Good god and I thought I was a nerd...
Mimsofthedawg said:
the other two seem like nitpicking to me. I might read the rest when I get back to work... just wanted to say that, thus far, I don't have much faith that the fans themselves know much about the Lore.
Either way... nit picking.
Obviously you didn't read the full list. This book follows from the previous three, with returning characters. One of the returning characters died in the previous book... and no one seems surprised that he's there, unharmed, with no explanation. There is a video of another character's death that took place in the previous book - and the video portrays a death scene that doesn't even resemble the one written in the previous book.

Oh, and two of the returning characters were 12 years old in book 2. It is stated that three years have passed since the events of book 2. Except that it is also stated that five years have passed since then. And both characters are now 18 years old (6 years older). The author apparently couldn't handle basic math.

There are nit-picks, and there are "you didn't read the novel you're writing the sequel to" - this falls into the later category.

And if the OP didn't convey this - well, I think the OP was trying to choose less novel-related items, and also the items that the OP found most amusing. If you want to see what we're upset about, read the list (see the OP for link).
 

Bara_no_Hime

New member
Sep 15, 2010
3,646
0
0
Leftnt Sharpe said:
Let me introduce you to the Leftnt Sharpe Tie-in fiction rating scale, starting from worse to best:

-Author needs to be punched in the face (C.S Goto goes here).
-Tie-in bad (Dietz is about here).
-Tie in average (Karpyshan here).
-Tie-in good (Karen Traviss goes here? Also Sandy Mitchell).
-Dan Abnett (Pretty self-explanatory)

Please feel free to rip apart my life's work.
I think Dietz has just proven he belongs down with C.S Goto.

Also, where is S.D. Perry? She kicks ass at tie-in novels. She actually made the plot of Resident Evil readable - that's almost worthy of Dan Abnett level praise.
 

Beryl77

New member
Mar 26, 2010
1,599
0
0
Hitchmeister said:
The real question is, is this just the work of an incredibly lazy hack writer, or did he have a design document from the third game to work from and is Bioware throwing established canon to the four winds in the third game and several of the most grievous errors are going to be repeated there causing an even greater degree of wailing and gnashing of teeth?


I'm getting my popcorn ready.
From what I've heard from people who have read the leaked script, it's the former.
 

draythefingerless

New member
Jul 10, 2010
539
0
0
imnotparanoid said:
draythefingerless said:
imnotparanoid said:
These people have waaaaaay to much time on their hands.
And thats coming from someone who spent the last 4 hours making orogami seals.
not at all. i know the ME lore to the point i understand all the errors they pointed out, and all i did was play the 2 games. furthermore, reading thru the book once and noting where the errors are as i read takes little time.
I know what you mean, but at the end of the day they wrote a list of mistakes in a fictional book, based of a fictional game. :p
yeah well, and we take time to post these comments. its all relative.
 

Aptspire

New member
Mar 13, 2008
2,064
0
0
What the hell, Dietz? You didn't veer off completely when you were writing Halo novels...I think...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_C._Dietz
....HOLY S***! He was the one who started the Sangheili/Unggoy Names idea!(In Halo: The Flood)
...
You're right...He's a hack :(
 

nightwolf667

New member
Oct 5, 2009
306
0
0
And here I was secretly hoping that the fans of Mass Effect had finally wised up and were ripping Drew Karpyshyn to shreds...

Ah, well...

One day I hope they will see him for the hack he truly is. The previous Mass Effect books were godawful, even by tie-in standards. And I read the Legacy of the Force. *shivers
 

NotSoLoneWanderer

New member
Jul 5, 2011
765
0
0
The author didn't even need to "study" the lore. Just play the games and maybe read some index information for clarification. Or have someone who made the game stand next to you while you right it and smack the pen out of your hand whenever you break lore.
 

starhaven

New member
Jan 24, 2010
406
0
0
SupahGamuh said:
Even I'm pissed off by this book and I haven't read any of the Mass Effect books yet!, but I've read every single nook and cranny that the codex offers for both Mass Effects.

Why did I chose not to play ME3?...


same reason as me its such a shame but i refuse to cave into my wish to play it so that ea dont think i aprove or like their service