Bro I don’t have to respect anyone I don’t want to and I genuinely do not care if I get banned from this site.According to the rules, we must show respect for each other.
Your comment was not cool, and if the moderation team stands by and ignores it, I will be very disappointed in them.
On that subject, mods locking the thread and punishing everyone instead of punishing theThread getting locked in 3, 2, 1...
You do realize they’ve suspended me before, right?On that subject, mods locking the thread and punishing everyone instead of punishing the bad actors is too soft. They're just free to do it again later.
No, I did not know that.You do realize they’ve suspended me before, right?
Your brave opposition to poster collective punishment has been noted Houseman.No, I did not know that.
Still, I am of the opinion that punishing everyone by way of locking the thread for the actions of a few is not good.
I've got like a 2.6K word-count document ready and waiting whenever the time comes to discuss the rules, as Nick promised (last he said in June/July that it was on his todo list)Your brave opposition to poster collective punishment has been noted Houseman.
Usually Hopi were referred to as anarcho communism, but even then I do not think that accurately describes it. No one in society was above another. There was no "idea" of class separation. There was no " leader", everyone's voice was equal and all was shared and everyone took care of each other. As described from historical texts, when they gave gifts to the "Hopi delegation" the delegation did not keep it for themselves, they gave it to everyone else to be shared equally. "Keeping things just for oneself" never even enters the thought process in our culture. We are taught from birth, that we take care of everyone and all things and put all else before self so much of the problems associated with Capitalism, Communism, socialism ect are contradictory to core cultural beliefs.I'm not sure you understand what communism is. Your traditional culture isn't communism by virtue of being both traditional and cultured. You can call it effective socialism if you'd like, but there's more to communism than sharing resources, it demands an end to societal and cultural structures just as much as economic ones.
Then you can add Sparticists to the list of names not used by Antifa. Why is the idea that names have historical meaning so ignorable to you?Also acting like Antifa of the period weren’t just rebranded Sparticists, the pre-existing armed wing of the KDP, is idiotic.
Assuming you and your family attempted to live up to these ideals as much as possible, from the tales you've told me, that didn't work out too great for y'all. You still separated into groups and prioritized the well-being of your group over the rest of the family, leaving them on their own.Usually Hopi were referred to as anarcho communism, but even then I do not think that accurately describes it. No one in society was above another. There was no "idea" of class separation. There was no " leader", everyone's voice was equal and all was shared and everyone took are of each other. As described from historical texts, when they gave gifts to the "Hopi delegation" the delegation did not keep it for themselves, they gave it to everyone else to be shared equally. "Keeping things just for oneself" never even enters the thought process in our culture. We are taught from birth, that we take care of everyone and all things and put all else before self so much of the problems associated with Capitalism, Communism, socialism ect are contradictory to core cultural beliefs.
The tigerThen you can add Sparticists to the list of names not used by Antifa. Why is the idea that names have historical meaning so ignorable to you?
Nice how you just glided over the part where SPD had KPD murdered.I'm not sure what wrong point you think you're making. Antifa in Germany only existed after the KDP was Bolshevik radicals. They and the Iron Front were explicitly enemies. Maybe you want to trace the tactics back to both groups, but when you have two groups that hate each other and you take the exact name of one of them, you picked a side.
Everyone does, you get used to it.Nice how you just glided over the part where SPD had KPD murdered.
What are you even going on about? The US government turned over control of the reservations to Christian religious extremists and mafia and used the force of the federal government to kidnap children from their homes and put them in religious extremist abuse indoctrination schools where my family along with many others were raped, abused beaten and murdered against the will of the people until John McCain helped stop it. What happened there has ZERO to do with "Their system not turning out well" and everything to do with the US government violating their treaties with horrific human rights violations. In addition to the religious abuse schools, the Feds refused to allow the tribes to prosecute non tribal members for their crimes, so gangs of white men would come through the reservation and rape, abuse and murder people and get away with it because the feds just simply chose not to respond at all.Assuming you and your family attempted to live up to these ideals as much as possible, from the tales you've told me, that didn't work out too great for y'all. You still separated into groups and prioritized the well-being of your group over the rest of the family, leaving them on their own.
I am not criticizing you or your family because of this. The criticism against communism I always hear is that it goes against human nature. Your example may be evidence of this.
So you and your family gave up these ideals you mentioned in post #148?Of course we couldn't retain our traditional culture once we moved off the reservation because we were forced to assimilate into American society
I'm not talking about "the tribes". I'm not talking about reservations. I said "you and your family".Saying something stupid about the tribes
Of course you couldn't still live the way we did on the reservation. Traditionally, the entire community did everything together. The women went from home to home in the evening making sure everyone was fed and were doing okay. There was no tribe when we left to be able to do that with. I mean in our household, I never had anything that was " only mine". Everything was shared growing up, even our clothes. When we worked on the farm, everyone helped one another. We still do when they need help with harvest and what not, even when we don't live there. One of the things I remember most when I visited friends homes after leaving the reservation was how it was weird how the kids had their own toys and belongings that were just one person's in the house and didn't belong to everyone. Like when my friend yelled at her sister to stop taking her doll and her hairbrush, that was so alien to me because objects were never treated like that in our house. Like we were given birthday presents and such, but after we received them everyone could play with them too, it wasn't just mine. I shared a room with my sisters, we share clothes, toys, hairbrushes, makeup everything. If that was what you meant then yes, we did carry that part of our culture with us, but we couldn't very well think all the neighbors were just going to show up on their own when it was time to pick the peaches or the corn! XDSo you and your family gave up these ideals you mentioned in post #148?
These ideals:
"Keeping things just for oneself" never even enters the thought process in our culture. We are taught from birth, that we take care of everyone and all things and put all else before self"
You gave up these ideals, correct?
I'm not talking about "the tribes". I'm not talking about reservations. I said "you and your family".
I don't think you're understanding the point I'm making.snip
You object to taking in more family members, people from your culture, your tribe, due to self-interest for you and yours (the family you did decide to take in). This mirrors the criticism of communism that it will break down because it is opposed to human nature. Your ideals of sharing everything were pushed to the background in favor of self-interest, were they not?Why don't we move in everyone' brother while we are at it? We can only solve so many problems at once here. I already took in my sister and her 3 kids, my other sister and her 2 kids and yet I should take in my brother too?
First, my sisters no longer live with me, I helped them get set up before I sold my home. I had to sell my home to make sure my parents could keep their farm. I live in an apartment now and legally cannot have more people move in with me in the first place. I can't even let my brother sleep on my couch for more than 3 days in a row by the terms of my lease. I am also not even the only person here who has a say in this. The man flesh who lives with me has an equal say as well and he is not from my culture. The biggest issue however is that my brother's all smoke. Even having smoke on their clothes triggers an asthma attack and I cannot breathe. Asthma attacks due to my present condition are extremely dangerous. It isn't the same as someone who just has Asthma to deal with. I have gone unconscious 6 times already from lack of oxygen and had to be resuscitated. I always have asthma attacks on holidays when they come and visit now and due the Pandemic, we are not having them over at all this year. I mentioned smoking when I brought up my brothers for good reason. Being around smokers at all is life threatening to me. Not wanting to die =\= not wanting to share objects with one another. Besides, I saved the farm, they can go live there with my mom and work on the farm if they are willing to put up with her and she doesn't chase them off again. She does not allow drugs or alcohol on the premises and will make them do chores from before the sun rises until after the sun sets. That is why one of my brothers is homeless right now instead of dealing with my Mom.I don't think you're understanding the point I'm making.
In the other topic, you said:
You object to taking in more family members, people from your culture, your tribe, due to self-interest for you and yours (the family you did decide to take in). This mirrors the criticism of communism that it will break down because it is opposed to human nature. Your ideals of sharing everything were pushed to the background in favor of self-interest, were they not?
That is all irrelevant, because we were not discussing your situation now, we were discussing your situation then.irst, my sisters no longer live with me, I helped them get set up before I sold my home. I had to sell my home to make sure my parents could keep their farm. I live in an apartment now and legally cannot have more people move in with me in the first place. I can't even let my brother sleep on my couch for more than 3 days in a row by the terms of my lease
So then they are not living by communist ideals and live in favor of self-interest, because otherwise, they would not smoke because it would be in your best interest, should they ever be around you.The biggest issue however is that my brother's all smoke. Even having smoke on their clothes triggers an asthma attack and I cannot breathe. Asthma attacks due to my present condition are extremely dangerous.