The naivety of your post is simply astounding. I agree that 4chan are in general teens and college kids with too much time on their hands and delusions of grandeur, but what they do truly epitomizes freedom of speech... besides CP that is. Yeah, I understand that basically all the shit they do is retarded and has no point, but the fact that they can post gore, rape, whatever the hell they want that would normally get shot down anywhere else really shows the power the internet has in saying or posting what you want when you want to.CJ1145 said:Quoted for utter retardation blowing my mind a little. Dude, Anonymous are a bunch of dicks. They go on a bunch of little power trips ever month or so thinking they're untouchable and attack and ruin whoever they feel like for shits and giggles. If they were doing it with guns instead of internet attacks they'd probably be considered the greatest threat on the entire planet. The FBI has every right to chase those little fuckmunches down, freedom has nothing to do with it. Freedom stops being an issue when you're fucking around with other people's freedoms while you're at it.Burst6 said:Yeah, don't do anything while they slowly take away freedom. Learn your place like a good little citizen.
Remember, the government is a group of people that are chosen to help organize the people who live in the country. They're supposed to work for you, not the other way around.
Besides, Anonymous members are mostly decent people in real life. Sure they are little cunts, but all their actions are actually a relief to me. It means the internet still has a bit of freedom left.
For every act of charity Anonymous does they screw over a dozens random people because they think it's hilarious. As far as I'm concerned their real life actions are a facade, because these are the stunts they pull when they have the power to.
Anonymous needs to die a wretched, smouldering death if any real freedom's ever going to be found in this wasteland we call an internet.
you've got it wrongAzaraxzealot said:would you rather anonymous grow out of control and get so sucked up in its own power that it will eventually take over our governments? (i really think that if one controls the internet, they can control the world)Ldude893 said:So much for the anonymity of "Anonymous".
Three cheers for the FBI and their bureaucratic crusade against freedom.
well hell no, this should teach those little cunts a lesson.
don't
fuck
with the government.
Untraceable? Perhaps not. Still, I'll bet this is going to be a jurisdictional and bureaucratic nightmare once they finally get ready to prosecute. Keep that paperwork straight you guys!Bek359 said:I'd say Anonymous is about to learn that none of them are truly untraceable.
The fuss from the recent leaks is that it had some rather candid memos from US diplomats that painted other countries in bad light (and other stuff they didn't want known, though usually it doesn't provoke this much reaction). So Clinton had to do some quick talking, and certain people in other countries had to be soothed, since while it may have been known that such and such did this or that, to have it out publicly that representatives of the US govt were saying it is . . .well. . . the white elephant in the room knocked over grandma's ashes.alrekr said:Most of the leaked stuff from wikileaks is mostly common knowledge e.g. David Cameron's a light weight... Whats all the fuss about, if the USA had just gone "so what" there wouldn't be this whole situation and people would have lsot interest in wikileaks
I'm not good at quoting so ill just write everything down here in fear of messing this up too badly.CJ1145 said:But nobody's asking you to do any of that. Maybe the government shouldn't be able to bend the rules to track them at our expense, but we certainly shouldn't protect Anonymous to prevent a purely hypothetical situation.
Well I don't know about it from your end but this particular conversation would elicit about the same response from me in real life, yes. As opposed to people who do a complete Face-Heel turn once they get on the internet, I merely become more... exaggerated, I guess.
I suppose that was poorly worded by me. It's closer to setting the store on fire than gunning people down I suppose.
If PayPal are just pointing fingers randomly (for suspect IPs), the FBI will raid, but eventually find out that they're innocent and PayPal will be the ones under heat. A worse eventuality got mentioned early on in the thread - the FBI will eventually find "the suspects" behind Anonymous, although I'd bet that they'd just use scapegoats to appease the corporations behind this witch-hunt. And if they really do find the real people behind it, there'll only be ten thousand more willing to take their place.AC10 said:I think what scares me the most is PayPal can just say "Go check out these IP addresses, we think they're the ones." and that results in an unquestioned government raid.
Part of the problem with Wikileaks is also that, while not necessarily true for all cases, info just get's "leaked" during a point when its not actually classified. A lot of military secrets get out because when they were presented out to the internet they weren't classified, leaving virtually nothing that can be done about the matter by the time some upper-tier official decided that "Hey, this stuff should be classified!". Some things will take months to get classified.WilliamRLBaker said:YEAH! the crusade against freedom...where people in the government can just go ahead and sell secrets.Ldude893 said:So much for the anonymity of "Anonymous".
Three cheers for the FBI and their bureaucratic crusade against freedom.
Whistle blowing you say? you mean the Person that sold the documents felt that a wrong was being commited and just had to get it out there? oh you mean that person didn't they just wanted to make a quick buck by selling the files they had copied onto a usb stick?
So many people are in support of Wikileaks yet I don't see those same people giving up all their secrets, The freedom of information is a silly idea some things in the world must be secret, I certainly as I said don't see the wikileaks folks posting all their secrets but thats the nature of people that support such causes they are all raring when it comes to other people but when their own secrets are in the open then its no longer freedom of information.
Yeah, great, it's a very good example of freedom of speech, also how that freedom can be abused. The right to bear arms does not equate to going on mass murdering sprees because you don't agree with the government. The right to a fair trial does not mean you are entitled to win every trial. In the same vein, freedom of speech does not mean you can go around pushing the limits of every law relating to speech, and attempting to destabilize governments by posting secret documents, then going on a hacking spree against anyone that disagrees with you.Turtleboy1017 said:The naivety of your post is simply astounding. I agree that 4chan are in general teens and college kids with too much time on their hands and delusions of grandeur, but what they do truly epitomizes freedom of speech... besides CP that is. Yeah, I understand that basically all the shit they do is retarded and has no point, but the fact that they can post gore, rape, whatever the hell they want that would normally get shot down anywhere else really shows the power the internet has in saying or posting what you want when you want to.
How fortuitous of you to say that, because it does.The fact that the government even dares to censor information made public via internet is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. And don't give me that "It hurts more people than it helps" argument.
The fuck? Did those words just come out of your mouth? Do you even realize how stupid that is? That's like saying "If that man had simply payed better attention, he'd have known that car was going to swerve onto the sidewalk!" Or "It's the kids' fault, really, for not realizing their friend was about to murder them all."As true as the fact may be, perhaps the government should have protected their classified documents and trade secrets a little better.
But that stuff is irrelevant! For morale reasons, you tend not to tell people how many civilians have died. That's simple propaganda tactics. Morale would sink to the damn seafloor if they released that stuff.Or maybe if they had simply released some of those documents (civilian deaths, casualty rates, number of unsuccessful operations) people wouldn't be looking so deep for it. Ever hear of the Pentagon Papers? Watergate? Vietnam? Too bad there was no internet then huh.
You're speaking in hypothetical situations. Of course I would have different argument, but we are in real life here, not your fantasy world where Cobra Commander rules the United States. Back in reality, the Anonymous we know is far more likely to try and destroy Skype because they think the resulting flood of complaints will be hilarious.You read that story about Skype being banned in China? What would you do if Skype was banned in America, and you could only get video chat support from government based companies? I doubt it would be the argument you have going now, and I doubt you would be against Anonymous if they were doing everything they could to make sure Skype stayed up.
Extreme censorship is not the same thing as protecting a country's interests. Would you rather we have the kind of nation we did in the Nixon era and the framing decade or so, with counterculture decimating the youth while they sit around protesting the war, throwing rocks at the men who dare to fight for their country, while the government is so caught up in trying to hide what it can it comes off like a giant conspiracy?No, I'm not a anon. No, I'm not a wannabe anarchist who hates his country. But yes, I am an informed citizen with less and less respect for his country every day. To me, capitalism is essentially a form of dictatorship that keeps the people happy so they produce more efficiently. And yes, I suppose it is the best type of government in existence today, so whatever. Stick with it. But please don't bleed in concepts of extreme censorship akin to NK or China. That would really make me lose it.
(emphasis mine)The German Federal Criminal Police investigated further and discovered that the server in question belonged to a man in France, but that it had been compromised by a third party.
if they dont want them to take the nets fight them on the nets, probe big sites like that so that when they go down you know where it came from, then do what you want to their net... stuffAzaraxzealot said:would you rather anonymous grow out of control and get so sucked up in its own power that it will eventually take over our governments? (i really think that if one controls the internet, they can control the world)Ldude893 said:So much for the anonymity of "Anonymous".
Three cheers for the FBI and their bureaucratic crusade against freedom.
well hell no, this should teach those little cunts a lesson.
don't
fuck
with the government.