Female brutality - NOW WITH VIDEO!!!

Recommended Videos

Epona

Elite Member
Jun 24, 2011
4,221
0
41
Country
United States
Mallefunction said:
Crono1973 said:
Mallefunction said:
HardkorSB said:
Just watch this, simply incredible:

Well yeah. People are brutal to each other regardless of sex, race, age, etc. It's not acceptable for anyone to do it so I dunno why you singled out women as being ore brutal. The fact of the matter is simply that they are no more, no less brutal than men, men just tend to be a lot less likely to report it out of fear that no one will believe them or that they will be seen as weak for being beaten up by their girlfriend.
Maybe it's important to point it out when women are violent because there seems to be this public attitude that only men are violent. In the US we have the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), not the Act Against Domestic Violence and not a separate act to protect men. See the bias? See why it's important to counter what feminism has taught in the last 50 years?

In fact, I would bet that this attitude that only men are violent is why this women felt secure in beating this man. She knew he probably wouldn't fight back and if he did, he would be in violation of VAWA. Had she thought there was equality and that he would have knocked her on her ass, maybe she wouldn't have hit him.
That was not my argument at all. And feminism isn't the enemy, hon. True feminism IS about equality. The extremists (who are HARDLY the majority, just the loudest as with any group) are the ones who want priority over men.
If feminism were about equality, hon, then why isn't it called humanism or some other gender neutral term? Why don't feminists fight against VAWA since it is discriminatory? How about the discrimination present in custody hearings?

Feminism is about helping women and ONLY women. That's all fine but let's not claim it's about equality.

I am done with this because this topic will surely end with me getting a warning or worse.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,572
0
0
boag said:
ok, please refrain from the silly examples, I believe can have a civil discussion without devolving to strawman arguments.

Jailtime for this time of abuse is never going to happen nor should it, that we can both agree on.

But, you should be able to sue someone over infidelity, you can already sue someone for mental duress and neglect. heck, the more i think about it and research it, the more i thing that there might already be legal recourse to this and I am just ignorant about it.
How are they "silly examples"? If you're going to legislate infidelity, you're going to run into "silly examples" all over the place. It's not a black and white situation.

As for sueing someone for infidelity, you're thinking of alienation of affection lawsuits, which are part of marriage law, which is it's own completely separate kettle of fish. It's almost a "breach of contract" situation.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,572
0
0
Crono1973 said:
I am done with this because this topic will surely end with me getting a warning or worse.
It might. I guess it all depends on what your definition of "warning" is though. Maybe you think "warning" is some kind of exotic fruit. How would we know?
 

Sizzle Montyjing

Pronouns - Slam/Slammed/Slammin'
Apr 5, 2011
2,213
0
0
Wow...
Why didn't he fight back?
But i'm glad she got arrested, she used physical abuse on him.
 

DementedSheep

New member
Jan 8, 2010
2,654
0
0
Agh, he should have hit back or at least tried to restrain her. If I hit a guy I would expect him to hit back.
Crono1973 said:
aba1 said:
I gotta ask why is nobody helping that guy?
Simple answer, because he's a guy. Yes, there is a double standard in regards to women hitting men.
Not necessarily. There have been a number of cases of guys beating the shit out of girls and no one helping. Hell there was one recently in the area where I live where a guy beat the shit out of his girlfriend at a train station and no one did anything, it happens allot. People are can be reluctant to get involved especially if it?s a domestic.
 

Artina89

New member
Oct 27, 2008
3,624
0
0
manic_depressive13 said:
Them stupid bitches. They want equal rights but don't want to face the consequences of their violent actions! They think they can do whatever they want! Stupid women! Feminist idiots! We need to beat some sense into those whores!

The majority of posts are going to be along these lines, even though if you take careful note, not a single girl is going to support that individual's actions. She should be prosecuted and thrown into prison, just as any male should if he did that to a person. Ideally, no one should hit anyone. If someone becomes violent, they should be subdued, not attacked in return, and then they should be charged for their crimes. This applies regardless of sex or gender. If women are getting more lenient sentences, this should be immediately rectified, and any proper feminist would agree with me. Also, why didn't the people who filmed that shit try to help?

Along with the misogynistic comments in this thread, people are going to cite a social experiment in which they got two actors, one male and one female, and had the girl beat on the guy. Many people walked by without trying to help. They will argue that this is some sort of reverse sexism, but they would do well to note that in the end it was not men who helped the lad, but a few women who called her out. The gender roles that perpetuate the idea that men are stronger or more capable than women are the result of a male dominated society which seeks to promulgate its power. Feminism wishes to erase these gender roles so that everyone is seen as equal and judged on their own merits, as individuals.

Someone will also post a video by someone called the "AmazingAtheist" on youtube. That guy is a fucking idiot and you are merely discrediting your argument.
Thank you very much for saying this, this is pretty much my view on this. I have nothing more to add.
 

StarsintheBlood

New member
Oct 12, 2010
96
0
0
If I hit a guy for no reason, I'll be insulted when he doesn't hit me back. Seriously, WHY did no one watching stop this!? I would have been all over there the moment she started kicking him in the head.

Props to the guy for standing his ground and not moving to a different seat. He did have some amount of class for not getting too worked up (even if it was out of fear for the prosecution he'd probably get for it).
 

wadark

New member
Dec 22, 2007
397
0
0
HardkorSB said:
Just watch this, simply incredible:

I want to comment...really bad. But there's nothing I can say without ranting for a good two to three hours. So I'll just say, that's fucked up.
 

Sara Fontaine

New member
Sep 20, 2010
147
0
0
Under no circumstance is behaving like that acceptable, especially just out of nowhere and about something that really ought to have been discussed out of public if he did cheat. And the sad truth is that should it happen, especially in public, most people are happy to just sit and watch or pretend it's not happening rather than trying to help. I'll admit I'm part of those people, because I've found if you try to help it only ever seems to make things worse and suddenly you're being threatened with a criminal charge yourself for harrassment or assault (even if you committed neither).

Bless him for just accepting it though; I think he would have been more than justified if he had tried to defend himself, but then all of a sudden he would have become the bad guy, right? That's not equality.
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,497
0
0
Colour-Scientist said:
Volf99 said:
ok I'll be serious now. I understand that and I realize that nobody defended her. However I don't think that people are wrong to express their opinion and I think that the people who make those comments make a fair point that we still live in a society that try's to be equal despite the fact that most people would get involved if the gender roles were reversed.
Case in point:
This going to be very half-hearted because I'm sick of having the same argument with the people on this site, it's honestly like pissing against the wind.

The people on the train should have gotten involved and stopped her but that has NOTHING to do with equal rights.
People not intervening is down to deep-seated ideas about gender-roles, the idea that you can't hit a woman comes from the idea that she's frail and wouldn't be able to take it. Historically, that is a male construction. Most feminists reject these gender notions but no one here wants to listen to that, for some reason they're emotionally attached to the idea that feminists are out to get them.

I don't even understand how equal rights came into the equation. She hit the guy and was put down forcefully by the police, what else would people have liked to happen? If the people (both men and women) on the train were in any way decent they would have stopped her, but they didn't, that's on them.
She will be put through legal punishments, the same as a man would have been if he had been in that position.
I agree, this has nothing to do with equal rights, more to do with deep held cultural beliefs.
 

saruman31

New member
Sep 30, 2010
309
0
0
Adellebella said:
saruman31 said:
hahah:D but the chance of getting robbed is pretty slim and the robber being a girl is close to 0
I'm going to find you, rob you, then give you your stuff back and go "HAH!!".

'Cause I can get spiteful.

boag said:
The dude isnt showing self control out of some form of Chivalry, the dude is showing self control because of Guilt.

He cheated on her, and the only way she found to deal with her frustration and anger was to beat the crap out of him. Was it smart? No. Was it rational? No. Was it even Justified? nope.

But seriously what course of action did she have left?

there is no legislation available to protect people in this position.
What course of action did she have left? Drop his ass on the curb, not make a fool of herself.

Listen, I'm sure a few of us have been cheated on, or not treated very nicely by a significant other. That's no excuse for acting like an animal.

And who's to say this is her first time acting out like this? She seems like the type that'd explode and kick this guy around at the littlest thing.

The guy looks scummy, but then again the girl doesn't look too ladylike either.
sure! come at me...sis!
Even if i like feisty women that one is freaking insane. The guy should have at least tried to hold the crazy. Getting pummeled in public is not good for anyone.
 

CrimsonBlaze

New member
Aug 29, 2011
2,252
0
0
Crono1973 said:
CrimsonBlaze said:
Either this guy did something to tick off his girlfriend and is just accepting any kind of punishment that she is dishing out to him because he feels he deserves it or he's the biggest wimp that I've ever seen.

If you F up, you come clean and try to work it out, if the opportunity even arises. One slap, punch or kick is probably justified, but getting stomped on in a train with people around is definitely not going to help your self-esteem in the slightest.
If she cheated on him, would one slap, kick or punch be justified from him to her? How many people would be sitting back watching if he slapped, punched or kicked her?

If people are truly against domestic violence, they shouldn't allow "one slap, punch or kick" from either party.
True, but I was referring to the video and not all relationships in general. If either of them gets violent, no matter who's at fault, then it's clearly time for them to part ways.
 

FinalHeart95

New member
Jun 29, 2009
2,164
0
0
He should've retaliated. Equal rights, after all. It annoys me when women think they can just get away with this. Not that a lot of them think that way, but the ones that do get on my nerves.
 

Mallefunction

New member
Feb 17, 2011
906
0
0
Crono1973 said:
Mallefunction said:
Crono1973 said:
Mallefunction said:
HardkorSB said:
Just watch this, simply incredible:

Well yeah. People are brutal to each other regardless of sex, race, age, etc. It's not acceptable for anyone to do it so I dunno why you singled out women as being ore brutal. The fact of the matter is simply that they are no more, no less brutal than men, men just tend to be a lot less likely to report it out of fear that no one will believe them or that they will be seen as weak for being beaten up by their girlfriend.
Maybe it's important to point it out when women are violent because there seems to be this public attitude that only men are violent. In the US we have the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), not the Act Against Domestic Violence and not a separate act to protect men. See the bias? See why it's important to counter what feminism has taught in the last 50 years?

In fact, I would bet that this attitude that only men are violent is why this women felt secure in beating this man. She knew he probably wouldn't fight back and if he did, he would be in violation of VAWA. Had she thought there was equality and that he would have knocked her on her ass, maybe she wouldn't have hit him.
That was not my argument at all. And feminism isn't the enemy, hon. True feminism IS about equality. The extremists (who are HARDLY the majority, just the loudest as with any group) are the ones who want priority over men.
If feminism were about equality, hon, then why isn't it called humanism or some other gender neutral term? Why don't feminists fight against VAWA since it is discriminatory? How about the discrimination present in custody hearings?

Feminism is about helping women and ONLY women. That's all fine but let's not claim it's about equality.

I am done with this because this topic will surely end with me getting a warning or worse.
It is called feminism because when it was originally started, women were not treated equally as men. It was about raising the female sex to men's level. The phrasing hasn't changed since then, but the objective is still the same.

That's pretty broad to state that feminists don't fight against VAWA or unfair custody. Just because the loud and proud ones (aka, the ones mentioned before) don't do those things doesn't mean that the rest of us aren't in favor of men's rights. How about you actually look into a group before just throwing them all under the bus?
 

boag

New member
Sep 13, 2010
1,623
0
0
Abandon4093 said:
It's easy to say that now. I doubt very much you'd have raised the point had you seen a video of a man beating a woman.
you know what fine, whatever. you cant seem to put me beyond the position of pro feminist man hater, so anything I say, you will just come back to the "If it was a man you wouldnt say that" argument.
 

BRex21

New member
Sep 24, 2010
582
0
0
BRex21 said:
Its not so much this one video, but rather a greater social phenomena that causes this debate. The place equal rights comes in is exactly that she WON'T get the same legal punishments that a man would. By and large the western world gives women shorter punishments, in nicer facilities and more frequent conditional sentences. In fact Britain is currently looking at eliminating womens prisons all together.
We also have a tendency to justify female violence. IE "well he cheated." even when there is no evidence to support it.
Its also an equal rights issue directly because of the stark contrast of how this would have been handled had it been a woman assaulted by a man. Namely No one would have been laughing. We are simply better human beings when women are being harmed.
Its especially a rights issue when governments impose laws that demand that, in the event of domestic violence, the man be arrested. Essentially criminalizing BEING ASSAULTED. Many European countries and US states have laws specifically like that and these laws have been lobbied for by feminists.
Its also an equality issue that despite suffering 40-45% of all domestic violence injuries and are victims of approximately 70% of all nonreciprocal partner violence men in the states have a whopping 0% access to state funded domestic violence programs.
This is just another stark reminder of a very serious issue and people have a right to be angry.
Colour-Scientist said:
I don't think anyone here has seriously defended her violence.
This is in fact a small inaccurate sample of the population. It is a segment that is by and large dominated

Colour-Scientist said:
Don't use the word feminist as a broad umbrella term, it isn't one.
Dont pretend that I did, I refereed to the lobby actions of groups that includes NOW, the larges feminist organization in the world who, has over 50,000 members, receives millions of dollars in federal funding from the US government and billions of dollars of private donations. They worked tirelessly to lobby to end mens rights to fair trials including mandatory arrest policies without probable cause and the end to reasonable doubt in rape and sexual assault cases and campaigned against federal protection campaigns for men.

Colour-Scientist said:
I already said the people on the train should have stopped her but that isn't an equal rights issue that's a side-effect of a societal belief system.
Yes they should have, yet had the situation been reversed there would likely have been a large media outcry that all these men were such cowards for letting harm fall to a woman, and had a man gotten up and stopped her he would probably have gotten hauled away right next to the man who was being beaten.

Colour-Scientist said:
Of course it's a serious issue and, unfortunately, very few people who complain about it are willing to actively do something about it. The sad truth of it is most people are out to fight their own battles, be it Civil Rights groups, religious groups or feminists alike. The problem is gender roles and stereotypes are so ingrained in society it's very difficult to change them.
I do my best to make my voice heard for equal rights for women and, to be very honest, I'm sick of the defense that women have to take a punch in the face to even have a chance to get them. We've taken more than that at this point. Of course there are inequalities that effect men, and while it's wrong, I sometimes find it difficult to want to actively help the very people who tell me that I'm a hypocrite feminist ***** without knowing any of my actual opinions. And before someone attacks me for this, I don't mean men as a whole, I mean those who have the previously stated argument.
Okay, that woman very much deserved the punch in the face. The argument isn't that women should have to suffer physical violence, its that men should have the right to defend themselves. IE if this had been a man attacking a man and the bigger stronger man who was being attacked had stood up and punched his assailant in the face people probably would have applauded. Had he done it to her it would have been a despicable act of violence against women. As it stands he has there is a good chance that due to mandatory arrest policies, that man who got assaulted will have to spend a day in a jail cell for being a victim of violence.
You said "I do my best to make my voice heard for equal rights for women." and that just sums it up doesn't it. Equal rights for women. It's currently a "sexy" issue while getting those same rights for men is very unpopular. Hell you just have to look at Sweden to see just how extreme this can get. The S.C.U.M. manifesto has become a valid political statement, in case you are unfamiliar, The society for cutting up men manifesto, was written by a radical feminist who thought men were inferior and should all be executed. The arguments that it is a joke are somewhat overshadowed by the fact that the author did try to kill a couple of em. Speaking out against there modern actions like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7WVCkLUzJ8
Is frowned upon and equates you to an extreme "masculanist." If we look at the description which reads
This video INVERTS the type of violence we see & accept without question on a daily basis. It is supposed to make you THINK.
The problem is that there are hundreds of studies that peg violence committed by women to men more widespread a problem than violence committed by men to women generally settling on something around a 70/30 split. They say we accept violence against women without question but in all honesty we don't we take it VERY seriously. The allegations are enough to haul someone off to jail, a violation of US constitutional rights and those of most first world countries, and even if found innocent good luck finding a job that stays on your record for a very long time. They also justify their act of vigilantism and murder by saying that in this fictitious case the man happened to be a murderer and rapist. The irony of this is that the founder of the group got 3 years for the attempted premeditated murder of 2 people.
What this video ACTUALLY shows is an extreme version of something that frequently happens, societies complete willingness to ignore and laugh at and justify violence towards men on the basis of it failing to meet the criteria of our typical victimhood.
 

Marcus Kehoe

New member
Mar 18, 2011
758
0
0
Likely they would both go to jail, but, if the man were to do the opposite and hit her once first then she hit the crap out of him non-stop then he would go to jail.
Honestly I hear it all the time, girls beat on their boyrfiends and ask them to hit them and when they hit them back actually they totally change face, "Oh he beat me oh i didn't do anything". I actually broke down a door of my friends when I heard a loud commotion then I heard his GF crying, she cried victim and said he hit her, 10 minutes later she went back up to start a fight and while she was hitting him I tried to break it up by holding him back, she then took the opportunity to sucker punch him and hit me in the face.

Once I heard both sides of the story he said that he woke up with her chocking him, and in the morning he had very clear choke marks on him and bruises from the punches, she had nothing.