Steve Waltz said:
I was just defending American women by saying that that the average American woman is NOT as fat as these female character adaptations are. The photoshoppers are insulting American women by insinuating that these fat figures represent the average American women.
Well, I'm googling right now, and average weight for women in America is pretty high (higher than in other regions). I don't see how are these images insulting. They were created specifically by applying average measurements to those characters to put it in perspective.
Some links: 1 [http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/body-measurements.htm], 2 [http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/aprilholladay/2006-12-04-size-age_x.htm], 3 [http://www.theaveragebody.com/average_weight.php]. These numbers from various sources seem consistent.
Also, an average is an average. That doesn't mean that everyone is like this, nor is anyone implying that. I'm not American, but I don't fit the average statistics for Europe either. I'm slightly shorter and weigh less than average. But the average still stands regardless of me. Not every American woman is over 160 pounds, but clearly many are, because when counting all the numbers together, we get a certain average.
Also, in my opinion, none of the photoshoped images are morbidly fat. I've seen and I know women who look like that who are perfectly healthy people. I think we use the word "obese" and "overweight" a bit too lightly and I think that media has skewed our perspective on how a real woman actually looks like. Even famous actresses get airbrushed and photoshoped for magazine covers, meaning that not even they look like the images we consume every single day. Apparently, Jennifer Lawrence [http://cdn.viralscape.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Jennifer-Lawrence-Before-After-Photoshop.jpg] is too fat [http://a4.files.xojane.com/image/upload/MTI0ODc1NTcyMjk5MTE1MTM5.gif] to be in the magazine without being photoshoped.
Other than that, some original designs are outright ridiculous. Sonya Blade for example. She has hips so narrow that not even pre-teen girls can compare, let alone girls going through puberty which specifically widens the hips in order to make the body capable of childbearing. She looks uncannily distorted in the original image, while in the photoshop, she looks like someone who can actually kick my ass. Though, if it showed a bit of muscle like actual female wrestlers, boxers or weight lifters, it would be even better. Some other photoshops are a bit meh (Rikku looks like she's presented from a weird angle which makes her look distorted in the altered image).
Captcha: heated debate. ... Seriously, it's becoming self-aware.